Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: ransomnote
Another liberal judge inventing law. This guy wasnt found guilty of insurrection. Judge needs to be impeached and thrown from office and law license cancelled.
39 posted on
09/06/2022 4:49:57 PM PDT by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: ransomnote
Typical Democrat twisty think; "convicted earlier this year of trespassing" = "insurrection".
The "Judge" has committed the logical fallacy of equivocation and he of course knew it. There was no conviction for "insurrection" so grounds for a costly appeal, which is the point of all this, Lawfare designed to deplete your opponents bank account.
To: ransomnote
One would think this only has teeth if the person has been CONVICTED of such? No? Then this is BS.
42 posted on
09/06/2022 4:56:45 PM PDT by
fuzzylogic
(welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
To: ransomnote
Decision reversed in 3... 2... 1...
43 posted on
09/06/2022 4:57:03 PM PDT by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: ransomnote
This is what happens when you take an Amendment meant for that time and that place (status quo
post bellum) out of that framework and advance it into the future. It doesn't work.
The same thing goes for the 14th Amendment crowd with anchor babies. In that time, in that place, under those circumstances, not twisting things and bringing it forward as applicable in current time when it isn't.
44 posted on
09/06/2022 4:57:20 PM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
To: ransomnote
"Couy Griffin, a commissioner in New Mexico's Otero County and the founder of Cowboys for Trump, who was convicted earlier this year of trespassing.. Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but he was NOT found guilty or even charged for insurrection... Guilty of Trespassing was the verdict.. He will, no doubt, win the appeal..
49 posted on
09/06/2022 5:22:04 PM PDT by
unread
("It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." W. Churchill.)
To: ransomnote
This judge convicted Griffin of insurrection without even putting him on trial.
I wonder, what are the chances of a lawsuit for defamation of character after such a thing..(?)
52 posted on
09/06/2022 5:38:50 PM PDT by
unread
("It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." W. Churchill.)
To: ransomnote
What a disgusting, dimwitted decision. Almost everyone who made the trip to D.C. was a stellar citizen - the best of the best. Tens of thousands more of us would have been there, too, as is our constitutional right, had there not been the COVID scare keeping people at and close to home. With the passage of time, history will identify those who came to D.C. that day to stand up and be counted for what was right. The judges who are twisting reality into a pretzel will be counted as historic criminals, traitors, and utter fools.
To: ransomnote
Will Illon Omar and Crazy Ocasio be for idden from office for their insurrection against SCOTUS demanding?
55 posted on
09/06/2022 6:37:01 PM PDT by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
To: ransomnote
The judge is right about an insurrection on Jan 6, only he’s targeting the wrong people.
58 posted on
09/07/2022 7:24:06 AM PDT by
nicollo
(arbitrary law is not rule of law)
To: ransomnote
59 posted on
09/08/2022 6:22:46 PM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
