Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Less invasive treatment for emphysema is as good as more invasive surgery
Medical Xpress / European Lung Foundation / Abstract no: RCT4448 ^ | Sept. 6, 2022 | Sara Buttery et al

Posted on 09/06/2022 3:41:41 PM PDT by ConservativeMind

The first randomized controlled trial to compare two lung volume reduction procedures for people with emphysema has found that both lead to similar improvements in lung function, breathlessness and exercise capacity.

The results from the study of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BVLR) should help doctors and patients to choose the best approach to treat emphysema.

Emphysema is a chronic lung disease. In people where the lung damage is unevenly distributed, treatment to target the worst area of emphysema, by reducing the volume of the lung by about 20–30%, can improve airflow and exchange of gases in the alveoli in the remaining portions of the lungs.

LVRS involves a keyhole operation into the chest in order to access the lungs and remove the areas of the lungs most affected by emphysema. With BVLR, the procedure is carried out using a fiber optic camera which is inserted into the lungs via the mouth or nose.

Ms. Sara Buttery, a research physiotherapist, "Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction is a less invasive option and is thought to be 'less risky' but there has not been substantial research to support this."

In the CELEB trial [2], Ms. Buttery and colleagues randomized 88 patients to receive either LVRS (41 patients) or BLVR (47 patients). They measured patients' response to treatment using the iBODE score.

"Both groups improved to a similar extent one year after treatment. Surgery and valve treatment produced similar reductions in gas trapping and similar improvements both in the total iBODE score, and in each of the individual measures that it is made up of," said Ms. Buttery. "Both treatments also appeared to be equally safe, with only one death in each arm of the trial after a year, despite this being a population with severe lung disease.

(Excerpt) Read more at medicalxpress.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: emphysema
I’d choose the less invasive approach, myself.
1 posted on 09/06/2022 3:41:41 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mazey; ckilmer; goodnesswins; Jane Long; BusterDog; jy8z; ProtectOurFreedom; matthew fuller; ...

The “Take Charge Of Your Health” Ping List

This high volume ping list is for health articles and studies which describe something you or your doctor, when informed, may be able to immediately implement for your benefit.

Email me to get on either the “Common/Top Issues” (20% fewer pings) or “Everything” list.

2 posted on 09/06/2022 3:42:29 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

If an option, I’d always choose the least invasive treatment for whatever the issue is.


3 posted on 09/06/2022 4:18:41 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I have what is diagnosed as COPD - which is a catchall but is really emphysema as far as I’m concerned. I would take a pass on this!!!!


4 posted on 09/06/2022 5:24:55 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson