Posted on 08/26/2022 12:58:27 PM PDT by ransomnote
Your post is a hodgepodge of unsupported allegations.
No, *you* are not following. I have never posted anything about “dirty dozen misinformation” or “science deniers”. Please stop claiming I have said things I did not, even if only in your own self-interest. False accusations do not reflect well on you.
No, I literally didn't know these things. I saw you show up on jab threads and engage in ad hominem and strawman against any and all opposition to the jabs, being sure to focus on the fringe elements, presenting them as representative.
Troll.
“Athletes were almost all given the fake vax if they wanted to play. It was mandated in almost all sports at every level.
Even today, unvaccinated Novak Djokovic has been denied entry into the US to play at US Open.”
Check out the sponsors. Makes sense now.
“US Open: Lack of tact? - Moderna is a sponsor in Flushing Meadows”
https://www.tennisnet.com/en/news/us-open-lack-of-tact-moderna-is-a-sponsor-in-flushing-meadows
The exact line from my post:
Babbling about things like (scare quotes, rhetoric) “muh peer review” and “dirty dozen misinformation” and “science deniers” isn’t going to cut it.
What part of the bolded is too hard for you to follow? The phrase "scare quotes" MEANS it is not literal.
So you don’t want to look through Pfizer’s own studies which they’ve been forced by a court to make public?
No, you knew. I have informed you of that multiple times. You replied to a post I made on this very thread where I stated I “am unvaccinated, am firmly against mandates, never so much as hinted that anyone should get vaccinated, and clearly state there are legitimate concerns about the vaccines” (all of which I have posted on FR multiple times)
Your reply to my post:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=486#486
My post:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=312#312
It’s very tempting to accuse you of lying as you have so falsely accused me, but I will refrain for now. Going by past history, including recently on this thread, you’ll likely try to weasel out of it with excuses and blame shifting, but I will give you a fair chance to act like an adult man, not a weasel.
It took two years and 2000 dogs volunteered for Fort Dodge Laboratories studies, by the kennel my dogs came from, to research and develop the KF-11 and Neopar vaccines.
Because that is how making real vaccines actually works.
The Coofjab?
Not so much.
No, I just forgot.
Your post 312 does not contain those words. The most it says is "— never mind I’ve never had the vax. (eye roll)"
Your post 312 was NOT TO ME. It was to another $hot $hill.
And my post #486 was NOT IN REPLY to 312.
It's beginning to look like you can't help posting abject lies even when the refutation is trivially apparent.
But for the record: You officially claim you never got the jab.
So what? You don't have to have got the jab in order to be an apologist or shill for it.
I also forgot to say this:
Troll.
I made error. My apologies. (I was in a hurry 😁)
Your post in reply to my #312 is here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=366#366
And yes, my #312 *does* say exactly what I said it did. It’s the 4th sentence of the first paragraph. Right after the “catheter herder” you snickered at in your reply.
Try again:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4088573/posts?page=366#366
I made a typo while Ctrl-F’ing.
Offsetting penalties, repeat first down.
Yep....the ‘victim’ class swarm now insist they’re not pushing these horrid $hots, yet, for *some* reason flock (swarm) to $hot warning threads....all while continuously attempting to label those who have accurately questioned the SAFETY and EFFECTIVENESS of these $hots as ‘cultists’, ‘anti-vaxxers’, etc., etc.
Their miserable attempt at pivoting is so obvious. As more and more bad news comes out, about these $hots, their dancing/pivoting will be increased.
As we’ve repeatedly suggested to them....find threads/post threads that tout the positive aspects of these shots....as you say, what they’re supposed to be doing (confer immunity), prove safe/effective...but, they cannot.
So, they troll $hot warning threads. And, smear and bismirch good and REAL docs, who have actually saved lives with preventative and treatment protocols, as well as warned about the dangers of these horrid shots.
And, just like good leftists....they revel in calling folks who warn, are not in favor of these shots as ‘cultists’, ‘Q cult’, ‘conspiracy theorists’, etc. They are, for some reason, obsessed with Q and with Dr Naomi Wolfe, as a DISTRACTION....since they have no positive $hot articles to post.
All boils down to TROLL/$hot $hill/pharm bots.
8/27/22
“Exhaustive study of German mortality data finds excess deaths tightly correlated with mass vaccination”
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/exhaustive-study-of-german-mortality?triedSigningIn=true
8/28/22
“Rockefeller Foundation Wants Behavioral Scientists To Come Up With More Convincing COVID Vaxx Narratives”
“...The SSRC and the Mercury Project are not only receiving funding from foundations, but also government based institutions. In June of 2022 the Mercury Project received another $20 million from the National Science Foundation, which claims to be an “independent” agency of the United States government. Meaning, fabricating effective covid propaganda is becoming a money train for the small groups of behavioral researchers and psychologists that jump onboard...”
You keep using that phrase, “scare quotes”. I do not think it means what you think it means:
https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/527032
But enough of this silliness. Another poster was correct when he pointed out all this derails from the topic at hand a little while ago.
Exactly.
Thanks for all of the articles/links you’ve posted.
The first sentence at your link:
Scare quotes is a general term for quotation marks used for purposes other than to identify a direct quotation.
Troll.
You’re welcome Jane.
I just found this. Very upsetting pictures of a 12-year-old after her first Pfizer injection.
Pictures at link:
“Toxic epidermal necrolysis after first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccination with pharmacogenomic testing”
“...1.1 Case presentation
A healthy 12-year-old girl with no previous medical history presented 6 days after her first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine. Two days after vaccination, she developed a low-grade fever with a mild sore throat. The patient did not take any oral prescribed or over-the-counter medications or herbal remedies during the past 8 weeks. On the 6th day after the vaccine, there were erythematous, painful patches and plaques on the chest wall and trunk, which subsequently spread to the face, palms, and soles. Mucocutaneous erosions were observed in the ocular, oral, and genital regions. She was diagnosed with TEN and immediately admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit...”
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pde.15074
You missed the context and application. They even gave examples for you:
Examples:
*”Liberal”: We’ve heard about these conservatives and their tax “relief”.
*”Conservative”: The liberals have proposed yet another form of “common-sense” gun control.
*”Libertarian”: We’re disappointed with the liberals’ and conservatives’ “inclusive” debate.
Scare quotes are used for words and phrases commonly used by those being mocked. Liberals do indeed often use the phrase “common-sense gun control”.
I have *never* used *any* of the phrases you put in so-called “scare quotes”.
I see what you are doing here and other reasonable Freepers can as well. I wish you a pleasant day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.