Massive Miscarriage Rates Among Vaccinated Pregnant Women Found Buried In The Pfizer Documents

Let’s start with the fact the PFDA (the P is not a typo) asked a federal court for 75 years to make public the many thousands of pages of data submitted to them by Pfizer to support the EUA they (the PFDA) issued.

One interpretation of this action is that they wanted the data to stay hidden for a long time to hide fraud and/or criminality (same thing). The other is that they only had enough staff to complete this task within 75 years. Let’s ignore the 2nd one as absurd on its face (especially since they seem to be pouring out documents monthly after the judge ordered them to). Where there is a will there is a way apparently.

Now why would they want to keep the data hidden? What lies within the realm of possibilities is that at the time they went to court, they knew the EUA and the resulting massive national and global vaccine campaign were pre-determined and independent of whatever “science” emerged to support or not support the campaign. Unfortunately for them, the “science” was not supportive. At all. So they tried to suppress the serious troubling toxicity and lack of efficacy data contained within those documents.

Well the court ordered them to make public thousands of pages of documents each month. My hypothesis above seems to be validated by the uncovering of what is not just troubling, but absolutely terrifying data on the lack of safety in pregnancy. While Dr Naomi Wolf and the WarRoom/DailyClout Research Volunteers recently corrected a report that overcounted miscarriages in one section of the Pfizer documents, they are right to have early and often called attention to signals about this issue overall. Indeed in May 2022, they broke the story of another section of the Pfizer documents, in which the mortality rate of fetuses and babies of women vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA injection was about 80 per cent.

Now, let’s do a dive on just one page of the many thousands. See below, Section 5.3.6, Page 12 of the document called “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.”

In this paragraph, at first read, it is just a list of adverse events and numbers, detailed in a way that is confusing at best, and obfuscating at worst. I think it is the latter because, if you do some simple arithmetic trying to parse that paragraph, you end up with this:

My hands are literally trembling as I write this, but here goes. In these 32 pregnancies, there were:

Note that this only adds up to 29 known outcomes, but then they note that “two different outcomes were reported for each twin” and then they talk about “fetus/baby cases as separate from mother cases.” I have no idea how to interpret this explanation of outcomes, so it may have been one or two less (or more) deaths then.

So, of the 32 pregnancies they knew the outcome of, 87.5% resulted in the death of the fetus or neonate. Burying this data in the way and not alerting the world to what they found, is criminal activity yet again. This is what they do and have always done when one of their novel products begins to cause death. It is just these kinds of actions that hav resulted in the billions of criminal and civil fines they have paid in the last 20 years alone. They have done this with numerous newly launched medications such as Avandia, Bextra, Vioxx, and let’s not forget oxycodone. Many hundreds of thousands of deaths have resulted with the burying of adverse event and death data around newly launched products until they are caught, pay massive fines, and then carry on doing the same thing.

This one is bigger though. And maybe why I keep hearing of a bunch of folks now starting to short their stock as they see this fraud as potentially bankrupting these companies. Maybe, maybe not. They are really good at surviving their frauds and scandals.

Further, in looking at the Pfizer documents more broadly you find so many fragmentations and obfuscations of data in the way they present the data, combined with inexplicable categorizations of deaths as unrelated to the vaccine when they could never have known that (yet should have assumed it until proven otherwise). No wonder it takes an army of volunteers months to dissect and pull out what the actual data indicates.

Now, ignoring and obfuscating the massive toxicity to the fetuses of pregnant women exposed to the vaccine also has major implications on fertility.

And this is where it gets even more horrifying. Birth rates are plummeting in many countries around the world, but the way in which they are plummeting is unprecedented. They are large drops, and they are occurring, almost like clockwork, approximately 9 months after pregnant women around the world started to be vaccinated . This is occurring after women the world over were told it is “safe and effective” in pregnancy despite the fact the trials did not include pregnant women.

Yet, in the first 12 week post-vaccine rollout surveillance report submitted by Pfizer to the PFDA, of the 270 pregnancies reported, they followed 32 of them and found a horrifying rate of fetal/neonatal deaths. Again stirs up memories of one of the most historically shocking statements ever uttered by an FDA voting member, my “friend” Eric Rubin, editor-in-chief of my favorite journal, the New England Journal of Medicine (this is a joke), “but we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it.” Dr. Rubin and I have a little history. In a NY Times Magazine article which partly profiled me, he was quoted as saying I “got lucky” when I testified in the Senate on the critical need for corticosteroids in hospitalized COVID patients in May of 2020, months before Oxford’s trial made it the standard of care overnight.

Well they started giving it all right. Now let’s see if there are any data to suggest the vaccines are having an impact on birth rates. Note that although birth rates can vary from year to year, and have small peaks and valleys within the year, you don’t typically see large decreases suddenly from one month to the other, in numerous countries around the world. This data is even more horrifying, some of which I obtained from Peter Imanuelson’s Substack called the Freedom Corner with Peter Sweden.

In Stockholm during the first quarter of 2022, birth rates plummeted by 14%, shocking a Professor in Demographics:

As someone who has been witness to massive censorship, much of it voluntary (i.e self-censorship), what the Professor says next is completely expected and in-line with what is now almost two years of many leading (cowardly) scientists, researchers and physicians who have willingly avoided making conclusions that might put the vaccines in a bad light, despite the immensely disturbing data on COVID vaccine toxicity screaming from VAERS, the life insurance industry, and disability statistics since the roll-out. Here is what he says in a newspaper interview:

His interpretation is that lockdowns ended, vaccines were provided, thus giving everyone the freedom to start newly re-exploring the world instead of making babies? Although I find this almost too absurd to explore, I will say this: Sweden never really had any significant lock-downs. I am so sick and tired of hearing idiotic alternative explanations for truly disturbing data on the vaccines. Things like “anyone can put a report into VAERS”, or “working age people died at higher rates because of unemployment and deaths of despair.” Yet in 2021, lockdowns were over, unemployment rates were at historic lows, and drug overdoses have been on a fairly constant (but not precipitous) rise for years. I could go on, but you know what I am talking about, the constant explaining away of “inconvenient truths," with my personal favorite (favorite is not the right word), the explosion in articles about Sudden Adult Death Syndrome in trying to explain all the healthy, active young people dropping dead all over the world.

Now check out Germany’s first quarter births compared to the first quarter in previous years:

Hungary is down 20% since the vaccine roll-out and this massive decrease was addressed by one member of parliament is this widely circulated video from the RAIR foundation. Other reports are even more shocking: Taiwan is down 27%, UK, North Dakota are reporting 12-13% declines, and Norway 6.2%. Admittedly these are a subset of countries, this is not meant to be a comprehensive analysis globally, but the month to month drop still needs explaining.

Further, disastrous impacts on fertility should not come as a surprise. Although censored, many in my network were aware of massive Facebook groups of women reporting and discussing severe menstrual irregularities as a result of these “vaccines.” These groups were shut down by Facebook. Remember, the vaccination campaign had only one enemy: “vaccine hesitancy” and our Federal government paid $1 Billion to media companies to support a favorable view of the vaccines. Massive groups of women reporting severe menstrual irregularities would drive vaccine hesitancy, so such talk must be suppressed at all costs (or minimal cost to Facebook).

We knew about the University of Illinois researchers who were trying to survey 5,000 women to study the effects on menstruation and were besieged with over 30,000 responses in like a day or two. The results were disturbing (and were either explained away as temporary or just ignored).

Google searches find many dozens of articles actually addressing the widespread menstrual irregularities reported by women but always concluding the problems were transient/temporary. But never forget the inaction, ignoring, and suppression of these data by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG). Never forget the Infectious Disease Society of America’s (IDSA) distortion and rejecting of the immense data supporting ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Never forget the American Neurological Association and American Heart Associations ignoring of the massive rises in strokes and heart attacks among young healthy people with no co-morbidities. Never forget the Deans of the nations’ 126 Academic Medical Centers who had to have been aware of what was happening in their University hospitals, yet said and did nothing. It is an endless list of leaders in Academic Medicine who either were cowardly or willfully complicit in the suppression and ignoring of these data or who simply fell victim to what should have been easily detectable propaganda.

I appreciate the efforts of some who explore alternative “hypotheses” to explain these suddenly dropping birth rates. Fine, prove them. Unless you can, as per the now ignored, but long standing regulatory standard, when a new medicine or device is introduced, you must first assume any adverse effects or deaths reported to be related to the intervention until proven otherwise. That is what I am doing here. We must assume the vaccines are impacting fertility unless some other provable or credible explanations for a sudden drop in month to month birth rates. So stop the shots until you can prove they are not (this would be the 189th reason to stop the shots).

Too many young people dying, too many becoming disabled, too many pregnancies resulting in fetal or neonatal death as above, and now we find out that if we continue with this vaccine obsession, they will not be replaced. This is a humanitarian catastrophe heaped atop the one caused by dangerous gain-of-function research. When will the world wake up to this rapidly unfolding horror? For those of us who know what is going on, it is hard not to feel helpless as we are forced to watch increasingly apparent and widespread needless death. But we will continue to try to get these truths out despite the massive censorship and propaganda overwhelming the globe. We have a moral and ethical obligation and take that responsibility seriously no matter what befalls us. Stop the vaccines, now. And if we can’t stop them, we must try to convince everyone we know to no longer agree to get vaccinated. Their lives and our future depend on it.

Of course I am. My ancestors on both sides came here in the 1600s (Jamestown and Massachusetts Bay Colony, to begin with) and fought in the Revolutionary War.

Ah, you're from Massachusetts. I begin to see the (liberal) problem.

How about you? You a citizen?

Of course.

Yes, of course it’s a red herring. I have repeatedly called out Fauci as a liar here on FR and you know it. I have also repeatedly stated that men can’t get pregnant.

I know one of your fellow trolls has called out Fauci; but I don't remember you doing it: or, more importantly, *when* and *why*.

Are you going to call out HHS for their tomfoolery? And with it, own the idea that the leadership is corrupt, and therefore, pronouncements made under their leadership are not to be given the presumption of truth (which would include..."studies")

Ah, but you did start out defending Korey’s claim that 78% of pregnancies ended in miscarriage in 2021. It’s quite plain to anyone reading this thread.

Give the exact post # I made that said so.

If you are now backing off defending Korey’s 78% claim, after consideration, that is a reasonable stance to adopt. So what exactly is your position now?

My position is that you're a troll.

The actual claim is, not that 78% of pregnancies ended in miscarriage in 2021.

Corey didn't claim that.

He was analyzing a study from Pfizer which they had tried to have hidden for 75 years.

The 78% figure, comes from

The pregnancies in the study

Which were known when the study started

For which an outcome to the pregnancy was reported to the study

Since there were 270 pregnancies in the study, and 232 of them had no outcome reported, Pfizer wasn't tracking very well.

Pfizer cannot claim. 25 terminated pregnancies out of 270 in the study: to do so would be to ASSUME all the non-reported pregnancies, went to full term.

For the known results, you have to adjust the denominator to remove the lost-to-followup cases.

That's what he did.

So he claimed, of the known pregnancies in that study, for which an outcome of the pregnancy was reported, 78% of those resulted in dead babies.

Which is not the same as 78% of all pregnancies nationwide in 2021 ended in miscarriage.

I already provided a breakdown by ethnicity, etc. Now you want me to do more of your research for you?

You didn't do your own research to my satisfaction: if a large share of US births is illegal aliens, and they didn't get the clot shots, then your canard "how come births went up" is partially falsified. Same applies to other ethnic groups / age, geography, and the timing of the births / pregnancies relative to the clot shots. Just using an overall percentage isn't gonna cut it.

Ah, now we come to the heart of your tricks. Demanding more and more proof, none of which you will accept. Reminds me of the old “Ashli Babbitt isn’t really dead” conspiracy theory you guys were pushing, the one in the Sham Wow Guy video you kept posting over and over again here claiming she was a crisis actor, as were the EMTs and her family, the blood was fake, the window she tried to climb through was actually a “movie set window” installed the night before, etc.

You're projecting about demanding more and more proof.

And I largely haven't commented on the Ashli Babbit shooting at all, except that it's odd the guy who appears to be involved got a rubber-stamp sham investigation clearing him.

But those are YOUR lies, again, troll: pulling in every possible conspiracy theory and mistake, and insisting that everyone pushing against the clot shots necessarily has investigated and accepted ALL of them.

Get rekt.

Me? From Massachusetts? LOL! I drove through a corner of it once, but didn’t stop. Tennesee gal here.

See, those mince pie hating Puritans just couldn’t get along with each other. They kept arguing amongst themselves, splinter groups would move off in a huff, and this kept happening until the ones heading southward ran smack dab into the Cavaliers and (gasp) intermarried with them. Oh well, all that arguing and moving and banishing and going without mince pie at Christmas was getting old anyway.

Of course I’ve called out Fauci. For lying, for funding GoF research in that leaky Wuhan lab, and more.

>>>>Ref your “Give the exact post # I made that said so.”<<<<<

In your post #29 you tried to claim that “illegal immigrants” explained the increase in births in 2021 despite 78% of pregnancies among vaccinated women supposedly ending in miscarriage. In none of your posts have you stated you doubt Kory’s extraordinary claims. It certainly appears you defend his claims in all your posts.

>>>>Re your “The actual claim is, not that 78% of pregnancies ended in miscarriage in 2021.”<<<<

No, of course it isn’t and I never said it was. Kory’s claim is that 78% or 87.5% of pregnancies ended in miscarriage among vaccinated women in the Pfizer study, and then goes on to quote “shocking” and “plummeting” declines in birth rates (actually births, but he says “birth rates”) during the first three months of 2022 in cherry picked locations.

Kory first claimed 78%, then 87.5%. His clickbait headline screams “Massive Miscarriage Rates Among Vaccinated Pregnant Women”. He also carries on about “disastrous impacts on fertility” and says:

“And this is where it gets even more horrifying. Birth rates are plummeting in many countries around the world, but the way in which they are plummeting is unprecedented.”

Then he goes on about how “during the first quarter of 2022, birth rates plummeted by 14%” in Stockholm.” The official Swedish site says the number of births during the first six months fell by 6.7%. Of course that’s not “horrifying” enough for Kory, so he cherry picks and goes with Stockholm’s first three months instead, giving no link citing his source.

https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/population/population-composition/population-statistics/

Next he picks Germany’s first quarter births.

And yet...

Interestingly, Germany’s latest (provisional) figures show there was indeed a substantial fall in the number of births recorded in January to March this year — suggesting a roughly 11 per cent drop compared to the same quarter in 2020.

So, what was happening with COVID-19 vaccinations when the January babies were conceived, back in April 2021?

According to the official data, roughly 9 million 18-59 year-olds (20 per cent) had received a single jab. Of those, just 1.8 million (4 per cent) were double-vaccinated.

Eligibility restrictions were dropped in early June, and by month’s end the number of double-vaccinated people in this group had surged to nearly 16 million (35 per cent).

Prior to that, a spokeswoman for Germany’s statistics office told CheckMate, “predominantly elderly people and vulnerable groups were vaccinated”, making a connection between births and vaccinations “very unlikely”.

Natalie Nitsche, a research scientist from the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, cautioned that despite the “striking” correlation between births and the vaccine rollout, this was “of course no indication of a causal relationship”.

If such a relationship existed, she said, there should be a gradual decline in births. “But we don’t see this, all three months have about the same number of births”.

And while the monthly data reveals a large, 17-per-cent fall in January 2022 (relative to 2020), subsequent drops in February (7 per cent) and March (9 per cent) were smaller.

Dr Nitsche also pointed to vaccinated countries such as Serbia and France to note that crashing birth rates were not a “universal phenomenon”.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-07-15/fact-check-germany-birth-rate-decline-not-vaccines/101237438

Next, he moves on to Switzerland and Hungary (skipping France, of course — French data do not further his agenda!). I could not find 2022 data on births for the US, but so far all looks pretty normal in Connecticut:

https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Departments-and-Agencies/DPH/Vital-Statistics/Birth-Counts/Birth_Count_2016-2022_v2022-07-21.xlsx

Who knows about other states. Connecticut was the only one to pop up in my search for US births. I’m not going to try to chase down all 50 states over Kory’s nonsense.

Whatever, Korey is making a huge assumption tying the births to vaccine rollouts 9 months prior, as if these women got vaccinated around the same time they got pregnant and just as the vaccines rolled out. What about all the women who were already 2, 3, 4, months, etc. pregnant? Their babies would have been born earlier, back in 2021. As for those who got vaccinated while pregnant later in 2021, births of their babies would not yet have occurred in the first three months of 2022.

>>>>Re your “He was analyzing a study from Pfizer which they had tried to have hidden for 75 years.”<<<<

Again, it was the FDA, not Pfizer, who wanted the records sealed. Even Kory says so in his first sentence, although he cutely calls it the “PFDA”. We’ve already been over that.

>>>>Re your “The 78% figure, comes from The pregnancies in the study Which were known when the study started <<<<

Apparently, you have also forgot the initial phase of the Pfizer trials excluded pregnant women, so the pregnancies either were not yet known, or the women became pregnant after receiving the first dose. We’ve already been over that, too. There were no known pregnancies when the study started.

>>>>”Since there were 270 pregnancies in the study, and 232 of them had no outcome reported, Pfizer wasn’t tracking very well.”

Yes, no outcome for 232 of the pregnancies had yet been reported when that page was generated. The 232 were still pregnant. Whether there was *never* any outcome reported is unknown. It could well be another case of “the army of researchers” not finding the pages or pages where the outcomes were reported yet. (Presumably, he means Naomi’s “crowdsourced” amateur researchers who have already proven to make outrageous mistakes.)

>>>>Re your “Pfizer cannot claim. 25 terminated pregnancies out of 270 in the study: to do so would be to ASSUME all the non-reported pregnancies, went to full term.<<<<<

Yet Korey would have to ASSUME 78% - 87% of the total 270 pregnancies, including those other 232 pregnancies, ended in miscarriage to claim “massive miscarriage rates” and carry on about “horrifying” drops in fertility.

>>>>>Re your “For the known results, you have to adjust the denominator to remove the lost-to-followup cases.

That’s what he did.

So he claimed, of the known pregnancies in that study, for which an outcome of the pregnancy was reported, 78% of those resulted in dead babies.”<<<<<

Wrong. The total number of “known pregnancies” in the study was 270. 0ut of that total of 270, the number of “known outcomes” at the time that page was generated was 32. Korey claims 29 ended in miscarriage, but admits he has trouble counting. It was actually 28. He uses “known outcomes” not “known pregnancies” as the denominator, which is beyond ridiculous. So, there were 28 known miscarriages out of 270 known pregnancies, or 10.4% — at the time that page was generated.

Remember the page where 3 out the subset of 50 women who were reported to have become pregnant after the first dose miscarried? At least that was the number of miscarriages within a subset of known pregnancies. Which is the only “known known” from Naomi Wolfe’s “research”. That’s a rate of 6%, below the normal rate of 10% - 20%. How about a pro-vaxxer blog headline screaming about how the vaccines “lower the miscarriage rate”? I’d call BS on that, too, because of the small sample size and because we don’t know the outcomes of the other 47 pregnancies for sure — these pages are snapshots in time as the study progesses.

To refresh your memory:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1559949374381244416.html

>>>>Re your “You didn’t do your own research to my satisfaction: if a large share of US births is illegal aliens, and they didn’t get the clot shots, then your canard “how come births went up” is partially falsified. Same applies to other ethnic groups / age, geography, and the timing of the births / pregnancies relative to the clot shots. Just using an overall percentage isn’t gonna cut it. “<<<<

How about you do some of your own research? Where is your proof that “a large share of US births is illegal aliens”? Let alone a large enough share to make up for a “massive” loss of pregnancies among vaccinated citizens and legal residents due to 78% - 87.5% ending in miscarriage?

The latest estimate (2018) I could find for percentage of US births to illegal aliens was 7.5%:

https://cis.org/Report/Births-Legal-and-Illegal-Immigrants-US

I never said an overall percentage would cut it. I said that if the vaccines truly caused such a “massive” rate of miscarriage as 78% (or 87.5%, take your pick), how could the number of births have increased in 2021? I stipulated that not all pregnant women had been vaccinated and that not all would have had a due date before the end of the year. But surely, given such a catastrophic miscarriage rate of 78% among vaccinated women, there would not have been an increase in births for the first time in seven years.

Re Ashli Babbit, I thought the same about the rubber stamp clearance of the cop who shot her. Note I never said you commented on that story, only that your demands for more and research and proof remind me of some of the posters on those threads. And here you are again demanding more research and saying I had not done research “to your satisfaction”. Lol. You offer none at all, just silly insults and name calling. You keep throwing out red herrings in the form of illegal immigrants and men having babies and questioning my citizenship, Massachusetts, Fauci, and so on. All distractions.

You did not like the other studies I provided links to (JAMA, NEJM), yet defend what Pierre Kory writes in his SubStack.

I wonder if Kory and his buds at Frontline Doctors should change their name to Frontline Grifters or Frontline Swindlers? Yeah, it’s Time magazine, which I do not find trustworthy, and it’s an obvious hit piece, but if even some of this stuff in this story is false or fake, why haven’t they sued Time for libel?

https://web.archive.org/web/20220813030152/https://time.com/6092368/americas-frontline-doctors-covid-19-misinformation/

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.