Posted on 08/18/2022 5:39:27 PM PDT by Libloather
Former President Donald Trump signaled that he intends to capitalize on the FBI's Mar-a-Lago raid – sharing an op-ed that predicting Republicans might exact vengeance by using law enforcement to go after Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
Trump shared without comment an op-ed by loyalist and conservative columnist Kimberly Strassel in the Wall Street Journal, whose work he has frequently promoted in the past.
The writer describes a 'boomerang history of unleashed governmental powers,' observing that Republicans used a post-watergate independent counsel statute to go after President Bill Clinton in a warning to the party that currently has unified control of government.
In an email from his Save America PAC, Trump tweeted the article's headline: 'The Payback for Mar-a-Lago Will Be Brutal.'
She posits that the Trump probe, which she brands as political and breaking norms on 'sensitive' investigations close to an election, could come back at Democrats if Republicans take charge.
'Mr. Garland's raid has made even the highest political figures fair prosecutorial game, and the media's new standard is that the department can't be questioned as it goes about ensuring 'no one is above the law,'' she writes about AG Merrick Garland.
'Let's see how that holds when a future Republican Justice Department starts raiding the homes of Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Eric Holder, James Comey, and John Brennan,' she writes, referencing Obama's former attorney general, the FBI director Trump fired, and former CIA director who has gone after Trump on Twitter.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
So an actual raid for actual crimes will be seen as a revenge
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
The rats will have disposed of all incriminating stuff by now.
Here we go again. “They’re good people, I don’t want to hurt them.” DJT - Nov 7, 2024
Now it makes sense why the youngest stepdaughter is in the living room making sounds like a Screech Owl while pulling out the flaming pink-orange and purple-blue dyed hair out by the handful. Good that crap looks better on a Rattler Bass Fishing lure with a tail skirt. I need to pick-up some of that and keep it in My Tackle Box for add on use.
He should do it but not say it.
Ha-Ha! I like the way you think!
Impossible. He immediately says what he is thinking before he even organizes the thoughts.
perfect
They won’t allow him to run. Obstruction will be the charge.
ame not personal, just business. the corrupt institution must cease to exist. throw it into Mt. Doom, don’t use it on has beens.
Hallelujah, President Donald J Trump!
Thank You-Thank You, I’ll be here all week and please don’t forget to Tip your Waitress unless she’s one legged, has a glass eye and works at I-Hop and answers to Eye-Lean 🤪
They have become the armies that the second amendment was intended to counter.
When Nadler said that AR15’s are weapons of war, he is correct. They are. The intended use is on those same federal agents who Nadler would have descend upon us to confiscate them.
Nice manners, and a mind reader as well.
The problem is at the DOJ.
Nothing will happen until the corruption in DC is cleaned up and that is going to take decades.
HeâÂÂs not wrong. Why arenâÂÂt the impeachment managers in prison for filing two fraudulent articles of impeachment? Perjury. . Conspiracy. False swearing. Obstruction of justice.
Does John Roberts understand why the chief justice of the Supreme Court presides over impeachments? He has/had the power to toss out the rticles of impeachment and hold the managers in contempt.
Meanwhile Bannon is guilty for sticking up for his 4th and 5th amendment rights against partisan congress tyrannyâ¦..& Peter Navarro is in jeopardy for daring to assert his own rightsâÂÂ-& for daring to compile a list of 2020 voting anomalies. There is NOT legit âÂÂoversightâ interest in these tyrannical subpoenasâ¦..no probable cause, no impartial judge, no rules of evidenceâ¦..and congressmen are not law enforcement or qualified to be.
The headline doesn’t match the article.🙄
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.