Posted on 08/15/2022 4:10:07 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
Link to .pdf
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47/80
The use of dark-field microscopic analysis of fresh peripheral blood on a slide was once widespread in medicine, allowing a first and immediate assessment of the state of health of the corpuscular components of the blood. In the present study we analyzed with a dark-field optical microscope the peripheral blood drop from 1,006 symptomatic subjects after inoculation with an mRNA injection (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), starting from March 2021. There were 948 subjects (94%of the total sample) whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation. In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.
(Excerpt) Read more at lionessofjudah.substack.com ...
Should be to those who got jabbed. More concerning is the tainted blood supply to those who were smart enough not to get jabbed and may need it in an emergency.
That is one pi$$ poorly written paper.
Potentialities of graphene and its allied derivatives to combat against SARS-CoV-2 infection
Pay careful attention to the info on cytotoxicity.
I thought the Abstract and paper were well written.
poorly written, sourced and about ‘symptomatic’ patients.
Damned glad I never got the shot.
The study I want to see is the percentage of vaccines which caused physical abnormalities and death amongst those taking the vaccine, broken up into age group, biological sex, economic wealth, race, and by vaccine type. Also, which vaccine by company, including (initial or boosters)where the most damage was caused.
That should be a very easy study to perform. Then we can look at those political and world /business leaders investments and correlate that.
I’ll never know but will take your word for it, I quit reading articles with “bombshell” anywhere in the title years ago. Thanks for taking the hit for the team!
Very troubling study.
***********
What’s troubling about it? If it is true then the reality of the
study needs to be known, procedures developed to help the
effected, etc. etc. It’s better to know there is a problem than
not know.
Almost every day I hear or read something that confirms my decision to refuse these little tested experimental treatments was the absolute correct one and today is no different.
Why would I want a shot that still allows me to catch the virus it’s supposed to prevent AND I can still transmit it?
All for an ailment I have a 99.8% probability of recovering from as long as I don’t have FOUR comorbitities...not to mention the distinct possiblity of side effects from these shots that I may or may not EVER recover from.
My exercise and vitamin supplement regimen along with some common sense personal hygiene practices have been working just find so far.
Re: 2 - one thing that rivals the smugness of those who got vaccinated is the smugness of those who did not.
Do better.
So you are basically saying that everybody is smug. Those who got the “vaccines” and those who did not.
Because this is the biggest I told you so in history. We anti-vaxers were vilified for two years and still are by hardcore vaxers.
P4L
A dentist, an acupuncturist and an Ear-Nose-Throat doctor. They all have MDs, even the acupuncturist. But they’re all way out of their specialty. This raises a few concerns:
1) Are they doing this as researchers, or as activists?
2) Do they have the experience to properly analyze the data and results?
The authors are all Italian. Is your problem with the language, the scientific methods or the statistics? The specialties of the authors are a bit offbeat:
Franco Giovannini, MD 1
Riccardo Benzi Cipelli, MD, DDS 2
Gianpaolo Pisano, MD, OHN 3
1 Surgeon, Acupuncture Specialist, Oxygen-Ozone therapy, Diagnostics, Giovannini Biodiagnostic Center, AMBB Headquarters, Mantua, Italy
2 Surgeon, Specialist in Odontostomatology, Periodontologist, Studio Benzi Dental Clinic, Vigevano
3 Surgeon, Specialist in Otolaryngology, Masters in Cytology
The other 6% got the placebo.
Also... this journal is crap.
The journal literally exists only peddle coronavirus-vaccine paranoia. That’s right: it was founded only in 2020.
I don’t write this promote the coronavirus vaccine. Quite the oppposite: I write this because I don’t want coronavirus-vaccine opponents to be made to look like idiots.
That’s because it’s a fake journal, founded in 2020 to peddle conspiracy nonsense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.