Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/13/2022 10:28:24 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
To: conservative98

1. This is crap. The 1917 Espionage Act cannot apply to a President. Under Article II, first sentence of Section I, he is the executive branch.— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) August 13, 2022

2. He is free to do as he wishes with these documents, including deciding as president to remove them as he leaves office. I suspect former presidents have done so. Unless and until a subpoena is issued to search Obama’s various estates, we won’t know.— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) August 13, 2022

3. That said, this entire process is a subterfuge, as I’ve explained here, on radio and TV.https://t.co/3YHpzboTjC— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) August 13, 2022


2 posted on 08/13/2022 10:29:34 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

Another real possibility...CWII


3 posted on 08/13/2022 10:30:31 AM PDT by hercuroc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

Right. The Feds will allow docs they consider Top Secret to be disclosed during discovery?


4 posted on 08/13/2022 10:31:37 AM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

The perps who engaged in The Big Steal try to prosecute the victim.


5 posted on 08/13/2022 10:31:52 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

what is it called when entities or persons try to destroy a President with false accusations and outright lies, thus putting the nation in danger? Sedition? Anarchy? a Dangerously Rogue government?


6 posted on 08/13/2022 10:32:15 AM PDT by Bob434 (question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

What a new level of in-your-face hypocracy would it be for Trump to even be arrested while Hillary goes free!


7 posted on 08/13/2022 10:32:53 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

So, J6 was a dud.


9 posted on 08/13/2022 10:34:21 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

If Trump was/is inept at handling classified documents, and he was president for 4 years, then, democrats might want to indict Trump for being a careless president those 4 years, where he was able to handle all of our military and technology and economic secrets.

He had enough time and opportunity to give/sell top secrets to the enemy, and didn’t. However, Bill Clinton and Hillary and Obama, did give away our top secrets to the enemy, like selling missile technology to China under Clinton.

Let’s indict all presidents who get to handle our military and all our secrets.


10 posted on 08/13/2022 10:35:17 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98
It's impossible for a president or former president to violate the Espionage Act.

The stamp of the American electorate says so.

Now, in a banana republic, where the prosecutors should all be hanging from trees after a nice tune-up, this may be possible.

11 posted on 08/13/2022 10:37:12 AM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

There is absolutely no evidence to indict President Trump, and here is not a Grand Jury in this country that would indict President Trump.

The only people that will be indicated are Garland, Reinhart, and every FBI agent involved in the unannounced raid.


12 posted on 08/13/2022 10:37:16 AM PDT by Round Earther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

Nothing’s going to happen beyond the Republican base uniting around Trump.

Which is a good thing.

And the DOJ? Merrick Garland’s toast.


21 posted on 08/13/2022 10:43:22 AM PDT by GOPJ (DC Elites think 71 million Trump Supporters are stupid, wear camo, and listen to banjo music.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

The Daily Beast -read no further


25 posted on 08/13/2022 10:45:35 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

So effing what?

A ham sandwich can be indicted. And, unless someone is convicted of taking part in an actual insurrection NO CONVICTION and prevent him from re-election.


26 posted on 08/13/2022 10:46:25 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

Anything is a possibility from corrupt dems, they impeached over a perfect phone call.


27 posted on 08/13/2022 10:46:45 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

Will wait for Hillary Clinton and Obama to be indicted as well, oh wait, they are Dems so its fine after all they showed “No ill will”


29 posted on 08/13/2022 10:51:11 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

Cankles bragged about smashing cell phones.

https://newspunch.com/clinton-had-cell-phones-smashed-with-hammers-to-destroy-evidence/

The reason Trump did not “lock her up” over it was because he was advised not to open that can of worms for the sake of the country.

Since the Left once to destroy the country, they are eager to open that can of worms.


31 posted on 08/13/2022 10:51:54 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (“A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within." --WD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

This latest BS is brought to you by Biden’s Weaponized Banana Republic which was birthed by the Chicago radicalized Obama. Obama during his eight years corrupted all the Federal Agencies Chicago Style. Now the Weaponized IRS is coming after We the People!


35 posted on 08/13/2022 10:53:06 AM PDT by Chgogal (Uncle Brandon wants your money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

Anyone who thinks Merrick Garland is gonna stand up in front of the whole Democrat world and say “Sorry folks, there’s no there there” is as out of touch as Biden.

This was never about finding evidence that would show whether Trump did anything illegal or not, it’s always been about finding something to support the charges they’ve already decided to file against him.


36 posted on 08/13/2022 10:53:07 AM PDT by bigbob (z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98

Trying to “get” Trump on a criminal prosecution means nothing. He is eligible to be president no matter what the liberals do.


37 posted on 08/13/2022 10:56:17 AM PDT by CodeToad (No Arm up! They have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservative98
Trying to imagine this evil corrupt government once again raiding President Trump's private residence, but this time bring him out in shackles and handcuffed, with CNN videoing it.

Come on DOJ/FBI What are ya waiting for? Get it on!

38 posted on 08/13/2022 10:56:17 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson