Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Want to know what a ‘banana republic’ looks like? (hurl alert)
Washington Post ^ | July 31st 2022 | Jennifer Rubin

Posted on 08/02/2022 1:57:46 PM PDT by Ennis85

Nervous pundits warn that for the good of the country, the Justice Department ought not to indict Donald Trump, since prosecuting a former president is the sort of thing “banana republics” do. That’s wrong on two grounds.

First, it is not up to Attorney General Merrick Garland to decide what’s in the country’s long-term democratic interests. The decision whether to “spare the country” the turmoil surrounding a past president’s criminal trial rests with the chief executive, as was the case under President Gerald Ford.

The closest the Justice Department’s prosecutorial guidelines come to that concept is the requirement that a prosecution serve a “substantial federal interest.” But that factor, as properly understood, weighs in favor of prosecution. As the guidelines note:

"In determining whether a substantial federal interest exists that requires prosecution, the attorney for the government should consider the nature and seriousness of the offense involved. A number of factors may be relevant to this consideration. One factor that is obviously of primary importance is the actual or potential impact of the offense on the community and on the victim(s). The nature and seriousness of the offense may also include a consideration of national security interests."

Well, there could hardly be a more substantial interest than punishing the leader of an attempt to overthrow a democratic election in order to deter future coups.

Fortunately, Garland made clear in a recent interview with NBC News’s Lester Holt that his department intends to “hold everyone, anyone who was criminally responsible for the events surrounding January 6, for any attempt to interfere with the lawful transfer of power from one administration to another, accountable.” The attorney general seemed to reject the idea of excluding a prosecution simply because Trump was president.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Society
KEYWORDS: assistantdemocrats; capitolriot; districtofcolumbia; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; fakenews; gopestablishment; j6; jan6; jan6th; january6; jeffbezos; jenniferrubin; mediawingofthednc; merrickgarland; nevertrumpers; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; rino; rinos; rubin; smearmachine; tds; trump; uniparty; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: BrexitBen
She’s got room-temperature IQ.

I still remember the time Bill O'Reilly beat her with her own lips.

Dumber than dirt.

21 posted on 08/02/2022 3:40:10 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ennis85

All you need to know about Trump is that the democratic socialist would sell their mothers to a wolf pack to keep him from regaining the White House. They’re are rightly terrified about a Republican controlled congress and a second term Trump. Nancy better be scouting a second home on Taiwan.


22 posted on 08/02/2022 5:41:54 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson