[Osage Orange]

I know charts.....and they don't do what they did.

Benford's Law..............

The Election was stolen...no doubt in my mind.

[butlerweave]

Will the Dems give Trump the win in October just before the Presidential election and say he can’t run again ,LOL

[z3n]

Pardon my cynacism, and my ignorance (I TLDR’d this), but haven’t we heard stuff like this before?

In other words, what wins when statistical analysis meats a media stone wall?

Guess what? Statistical analysis is not an “unstoppable force”.

[Tupelo]

I think we all know the election was stolen.
Most of us think the next election will be stolen.
Some of us think after the next few election cycles, they will be abandoned as a relic of the past.

[ckilmer]

the scale of this is so huge and the corrections since have been so minor—that it will be hard to see major changes in the system in the next election.

[kiryandil]

Another interesting data point.

I'll file this for looking into, later.

[jasonandtheb]

I believe this Gateway Pundit article was taken from Fox Metro News without giving it any credit:

https://foxmetronews.com/news/revisiting-interview-with-draza-smith-and-jeff-odonnell-regarding-edison-data-from-2020-election/

[SomeCallMeTim]

How can this possibly be true, and be accepted?

[M Kehoe]

Biden may have received 81 million votes, but 81 million people didn’t vote for him.

5.56mm

[glimmerman70]

There has been more than enough evidence to look at the ballots and signatures and canvas and machines. No one did anything because most all are in on it. Will take a very brave few to stand up. Then find judges to look at it to see it. Do that and you will find huge fraud..

[LizzieD]

This stuff is hard for me to comprehend. Does it confirm Mike Lindell’s theory? Does it conflict? or is it completely different data?

[x]

Big cities (Democrat) always deliver their results later than suburbs and small towns. That creates the possibility for cheating, but it doesn't prove it.

In 2020, Republicans tended to vote in person. Democrats tended to vote by mail, and the mail-in votes took longer to count, meaning they'd be reported later. Again, that makes cheating more possible, probably more likely, but it doesn't prove it.

Trump wasn't going to carry Rhode Island anyway. More people live in the cities (Democrat) than in the country (Republican).

[Mr. K]

If nothing else there should be one mandatory rule- tabulated results should be auditable buy anyone at any time, or the results are invalid.

Try going to the IRS with records this bad...

[cherry]

I remember clearly people on FR talking about how the rats will simply declare victory and their slave media embellish it and play along....

our local paper refused to even mention the fraud but was so biased that in a sole article about the allegations they used the word "baseless" in the title....

I called them on it....how does a paper put their opinion in the title of news article.

[MikelTackNailer]

We need to get a better idea of how a ballot goes from the voter, to the tabulator, to the state and Edison and eventually to the New York Times.

No no no. You take it to the New York Post and the Washington Times for any chance of actual reporting. Otherwise you're writing a letter to Santa.

[icclearly]

Remember the Jima' Carter bandwagon many years ago when Jimma' would implant himself into a country's election event and declare if it was or was not a fraud?

Where is Jima' when you need him?