The Second amendment says nothing about "guns" but we aren't supposed to pretend to be so stupid that we don't know what it's talking about.
Would George Washington "certify" obvious fraud electors?
No. The founders never envisioned gutless cowards being in the Vice Presidency, because they had no association with gutless cowards.
A man of the framer's era would *NOT* bow to "process" but would instead to the honorable thing.
This is your problem. You don't understand this "honor" thing in the minds of the framers.
None of them, not one, would agree to certify a clearly false election, and they didn't think people were so stupid that this would need to be spelled out.
Frankly, we'd do well to go back to the early days of the country when most presidential electors were appointed by state legislatures.