[srmanuel]

From the corporation’s standpoint, it’s cheaper to pay for an abortion than pay maternity expenses and another name added to the company benefits package.

It’s hard to imagine putting a cost benefit analysis on the birth of a human being but it’s being done.

[cranked]

Exactly.

[AlbertWang]

According to this site an uncomplicated live birth is $13k.
https://www.valuepenguin.com/cost-childbirth-health-insurance

Toss in 12 weeks of maternity leave and killing the baby is by far cheaper than giving birth.

I guess America has crossed a line. We will now kill for cash.

[silent majority rising]

Tucker Carlson has pointed that out.

[Born in 1950]

Insightful perspective. But not providing abortion benefits doesn't mean the company will have to provide maternity leave or have another dependent to insure. That would be unlikely, imo.

A woman won't be dissuaded from having an abortion by her employer's benefit package.

[NTHockey]

Giving one benefit to selected employees is a lawsuit waiting to be filed.

[Gaffer]

That’s true. Provided that the ‘healthcare’ plans for which they pay all or part of actually do adequately provide those benefits.