Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cecily

At first I thought this was a glimmer of sanity but they’re actually endorsing “transitions “ before the onset of puberty at age 12, which is, if possible, an even worse abomination.


4 posted on 06/19/2022 1:08:36 PM PDT by Orosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Orosius
At first I thought this was a glimmer of sanity but they’re actually endorsing “transitions “ before the onset of puberty at age 12, which is, if possible, an even worse abomination.

I wouldn't call it an endorsement so much as a devil's bargain.

19 posted on 06/19/2022 1:51:29 PM PDT by Terabitten (Our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Orosius

There should be no transition time even mentioned in this “ban”.


21 posted on 06/19/2022 1:59:28 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Orosius
At first I thought this was a glimmer of sanity but they’re actually endorsing “transitions “ before the onset of puberty at age 12, which is, if possible, an even worse abomination.

My thoughts exactly, there is nothing to stop a bad nation (like China) from forcing these transitions on young boys in order to win medals when they are older.

23 posted on 06/19/2022 2:04:36 PM PDT by LVS1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson