grey_whiskers wrote: “Yes, they have been proven effective. The results have been posted gazillions of times, and you keep lying in response.”
You’re the one who is lying. There has yet to be a ‘gold standard’ ie, large scale, placebo controlled, blind, randomized, study that has shown their effectiveness.
Gold-standard trials are supposed to demonstrate safety and efficacy in such a way that the safety of the jabs can be quantified, and to demonstrate that the safety is not likely (to some level of confidence) to be due to random chance.
Pfauci's trials did not do that; they proved problems with the jabs.
For HCQ / Ivermectin, both drugs have had their safety profiles established long before COVID came along; the only thing left is efficacy.
Which has been demonstrated in both India and Africa. Not in trials, but in large scale administration.
And given a large enough dataset, gross efficacy can and has been demonstrated.
You appear to be either a paid troll, a paid, shill, or a cretin who seems to confuse the null hypothesis (as a methodology to remove false positives) and the idea that "if it hasn't been rigorously proven, it must be FALSE".