Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
You're simply wrong.

Gold-standard trials are supposed to demonstrate safety and efficacy in such a way that the safety of the jabs can be quantified, and to demonstrate that the safety is not likely (to some level of confidence) to be due to random chance.

Pfauci's trials did not do that; they proved problems with the jabs.

For HCQ / Ivermectin, both drugs have had their safety profiles established long before COVID came along; the only thing left is efficacy.

Which has been demonstrated in both India and Africa. Not in trials, but in large scale administration.

And given a large enough dataset, gross efficacy can and has been demonstrated.

You appear to be either a paid troll, a paid, shill, or a cretin who seems to confuse the null hypothesis (as a methodology to remove false positives) and the idea that "if it hasn't been rigorously proven, it must be FALSE".

141 posted on 06/14/2022 9:22:07 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

grey_whiskers wrote: “Gold-standard trials are supposed to demonstrate safety and efficacy in such a way that the safety of the jabs can be quantified, and to demonstrate that the safety is not likely (to some level of confidence) to be due to random chance.”

The question is gold-standard trials of HCL and ivermectin.

grey_whiskers wrote: “ trials did not do that; they proved problems with the jabs.”

All vaccines, all drugs, have side-effects. In this case, the side-effects of the vaccines are over-ridden by the effectiveness of the vaccines.

grey_whiskers wrote: “For HCQ / Ivermectin, both drugs have had their safety profiles established long before COVID came along; the only thing left is efficacy. Which has been demonstrated in both India and Africa. Not in trials, but in large scale administration.”

If Africa and India conclusively established the effectiveness of these treatments, then why hasn’t that effectiveness been replicated in a gold-standard trial.

grey_whiskers wrote: You appear to be either a paid troll, a paid, shill, or a cretin who seems to confuse the null hypothesis (as a methodology to remove false positives) and the idea that “if it hasn’t been rigorously proven, it must be FALSE”.”

You seem to be a paid troll or a paid shill for the anti-vaxxer conspiracy cult who has been unable to prove the effectiveness of HCL or ivermectin. Nor have you been able to prove that the vaccines have saved millions of lives.


142 posted on 06/14/2022 9:58:36 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson