Posted on 06/12/2022 5:48:16 AM PDT by ChuckR163
Dr Geert Vanden Bossche warns about how the vaccine works.
What Dr Geert Vanden Bossche was warning about is that vaccination during the pandemic, which is not “sterilizing”, will lead to the evolution of numerous vaccine evading virus variants [which can cause more deaths, or more damage, pushing more people onto disability and gov't programs, which is the plan]. Famously, Geert predicted that Covid-19 will get more severe over time as the virus evolves to not only bypass but also to take advantage of the vaccinal antibodies. People who get the vaccines keep getting reinfected. But at what rate is not clear, but it's problematic. (This author has great arguments with screenshots and links.)
Mass vaccination in the midst of a pandemic was always against protocol, I believe.
People who get the vaccines keep getting reinfected.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And I for one am exactly seeing that. In my office of a dozen people, half decided to get EGT’d and half decided not to. Of the half that did take the shot, there have been numerous cases of repeated WuFlu infections and then a few months later, reinfected. Of those who didn’t get EGT’d, not a single person has contracted the WuFlu. This is obviously to small a sample size to draw too big of a conclusion.... but it says something.
Seems he was wrong about that. Later variants have been more transmissable but not more virulent.
In 1894 Judge Bartlett of the New York Supreme Court in the case of Walters decided that to compel vaccination by intimidation or force was criminal assault. Source: "Crime against the school childe". (Remember, this was the NY supreme court, which was later overridden by the US supreme court.) Chas M Higgins. 1915. https://archive.org/details/crimeagainstscho00higg_0_201804. But this was later reversed by the US supreme court.
In 1905 the US Supreme Court declares, in the case of Jacobson, that forcing a person to get vaccinated is constitutional. This is mentioned here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1449224/ "A state may enact a compulsory vaccination law, since the legislature has the discretion to decide whether vaccination is the best way to prevent smallpox and protect public health. The legislature may exempt children from the law without violating the equal protection rights of adults if the law applies equally among adults": https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/
I’m not a medical professional. I have a question. If the injections did not contain nor eliminate the coronavirus are those having taken the injections more of a danger to the public health ?
Still early, semi.
If the injections did not contain nor eliminate the coronavirus are those having taken the injections more of a danger to the public health ?Anecdotal evidence suggests that the vaccinated transmit certain proteins to other unvaccinated people in the household. But I haven't seen any studies on this.
As I understand it, that Jacobson decision was based on the particular strength of the MA “Commonwealth” constitution (and therefore was only relevant to MA)—and only led to a permissible fine for those who opted out.
The injections were classified as experimental. Does this mean there is a minimum/maximum time to determine if the experimental vaccine achieved any measure of successful containment of coronavirus ?
Mass vaccination in the midst of a pandemic was always against protocol, I believe.
*********
You believe wrong. Vaccination has saved many lives during polio and smallpox epidemics. Napoleon was smart enough to recognize this — by freeing a captive relative of Englishman Edward Jenner in gratitude for Jenner’s developing the vaccine that protected French troops from Smallpox. If we cannot vaccinate when it is most needed, we cannot vaccinate at all, and we go back to the days when epidemics killed millions.
That is the main medical issue that still needs to addressed and answered.
Don't forget that the vaccine was mandated to all the military and most police officers, and even employers complied with the government edict
which required its workers to get the vaccine in order to continue employment.
So much for "voluntary" ; it is nothing short of coercion by Federal government edict !
Side effects : that is what VAERS is supposed to be used for reporting vaccine 'side effects',
but many people dismiss such reports.
Without a listing of 'side effects', we will never know the true damage arising from the mandatory "experimental" vaccine.
‘’ Seems he was wrong about that. Later variants have been more transmissable but not more virulent. ’’
———-
He made his predictions May 9 of this year. He is talking about new variants in highly vaccinated countries in the fall or so….
‘’ I SERIOUSLY expect that a series of new highly virulent and highly infectious SARS-CoV-2 (SC-2) variants will now rapidly and independently emerge in highly vaccinated countries all over the world and that they will soon spread at high pace. I expect the current pattern of repetitive infections and relatively mild disease in vaccinees to soon aggravate and be replaced by severe disease and death. Unfortunately, there is no way vaccinees can rely on assistance from their innate immune system to protect against coronaviruses as their relevant innate IgM antibodies are increasingly being outcompeted by infection-enhancing vaccinal Abs, which are continuously recalled due to the circulation of highly infectious Omicron variants. In contrast, Omicron’s high infectiousness would enable the non-vaccinated to train their innate immune defense against SC-2 while the infectious and pathogenic capacity of the new SC-2 variants would be debilitated in the non-vaccinated for lack of infection-enhancing Abs in their blood
Don't forget that this "experimental", mandated biologic injection
was approved after only 4 1/2 months of testing.
That is unheard of short period of time for FDA/ CDC approval.
As is approving a vaccine before a 5 year trial period.
I'm betting that's in the works as we speak.... at some point the CDC will declare the “experiment” a huge success and make it mandatory..as well as making all future “experiments” mandatory as well.....I hope I'm wrong...but..../s
ClearCase_guy wrote: “Mass vaccination in the midst of a pandemic was always against protocol, I believe.”
How do you explain the mass vaccinations during the polio pandemic? Mass vaccinations are a valid response to a pandemic.
You read my mind FRiend
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.