Vincenzo Peruggia.
Posted on 06/01/2022 9:40:20 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa may be one of the most beloved artworks in the world. Seen by millions of people each year, it is considered to be the crown jewel of the Louvre’s collection, an iconic work of the Renaissance, and a painting that is impossible to value because it is seen as being priceless. It has also been the target of theft and vandalism on several occasions.
Since the start of the 20th century, the painting, which was acquired by France in 1797, has had spray paint and a teacup thrown at it. This week, it was caked. In 1956 alone, two vandals tried to use a razor blade and a rock to defile it on separate occasions. Each time, the Mona Lisa has emerged without damage. (All of this doesn’t count the various artists who have altered the Mona Lisa’s image, among the Marcel Duchamp, who famously put a mustache on a reproduction of the Leonardo painting, or the era during World War II when the painting risked being seized by the Nazis during their occupation of France.)
In short, the Mona Lisa has faced so much potential damage that even Salvador Dalí was once moved to speak on all the vandalism, attributing to the painting “a power, unique in all art history, to provoke the most violent and different kinds of aggressions.”
To look back on this unusual art-historical lineage, ARTnews has charted below five times in which the Mona Lisa was vandalized or stolen.
1911: The Mona Lisa is stolen
Part of the reason the Mona Lisa is known worldwide is because of its theft in 1911 by the Italian handyman Vincenzo Peruggia. That year, Peruggia and two others stowed themselves away in a closet of the Louvre, hung around until the museum closed, and then took the painting, which at the time was considered a minor work by Leonardo, with them, hopping on a train out of Paris. As the theft gained more and more press, both within France and outside it, Peruggia held on to the work, at one point stashing it beneath the floorboards of his Paris apartment. A little over two years after the theft, Peruggia made an attempt to sell the work to a dealer in Florence, in an attempt, he believed, to bring back to Italy a treasure that it had lost. The proposed sale backfired when the dealer called the director of the Uffizi Galleries, who obtained the work and called the police. Peruggia went on to spend six months in prison, and the painting was returned to the Louvre.
1956: A rock is thrown at Leonardo’s masterpiece
In 1956, the Mona Lisa was vandalized not once but twice. First, a vandal attempted to take a razor blade to the painting, though no damage ended up being inflicted. Then, a Bolivian man named Hugo Unjaga Villegas tossed a rock at the painting. “I had a stone in my pocket and suddenly the idea to throw it came to mind,” he said at the time. Thankfully, the painting was already behind glass, which meant that Villegas did not do permanent damage to the painting. The rock managed to knock off a speck of paint in one area, though that was easily repaired by experts with the French state, who restored the painting and put it back on view several days after the vandalism.
1974: While on tour, Leonardo’s painting is nearly damaged in Tokyo
The Mona Lisa has rarely ever left the Louvre, which may explain why 1.15 million people reportedly saw the painting when it traveled to the National Museum in Tokyo. One of those people was Tomoko Yonezu, a 25-year-old Japanese woman who tried to spray paint the canvas in red on its first day on view. In the days before the opening, the presentation had been the subject of discussion among disability activists, who claimed that in refusing access to those who needed assistance in the name of crowd control, the National Museum was discriminating against the disabled. Yonezu then took matters into her own hands with some degree of success—somewhere between 20 and 30 droplets of spray paint made it onto Leonardo’s painting, but in the end, the work was spared. Yonezu continued to face the consequences, however, and she was later brought to court after being detained. The art historian Penelope Jackson has reported that women’s rights groups perceived sexism in the legal proceedings and protested outside the courthouse. Ultimately, in 1975, Yonezu was convicted of a misdemeanor and made to pay a fine of 3,000 yen, although her act bore fruit, as the National Museum set aside a day when the disabled could exclusively visit the Mona Lisa.
2009: La Gioconda is hit with a teacup
It was an otherwise ordinary day at the Louvre when, in 2009, a Russian woman came to the gallery that held the Mona Lisa at the time and smashed a teacup against the painting. She had come to the museum with the cup concealed inside her bag, and Louvre representatives said she had let loose because she had been denied French citizenship. Calling the woman “clearly deranged,” a Louvre spokesperson told the New York Times that “viewing was only disturbed the time it took to pick up the pieces.” Thanks once again to her glass case, the Mona Lisa was not damaged. Still, some took the attempted vandalism as proof that greater security was needed. “The truth is that the Louvre needs to consider moving the Mona Lisa to its own gallery, at a safe distance from other works,” Jonathan Jones wrote in the Guardian. Ultimately, the Louvre did just that, partially in an effort to stem lines of people that had been spilling over, and in 2019, the glass on the Mona Lisa was upgraded.
2022: The Mona Lisa gets caked Museum visitors photographing a portrait of a woman that has been smeared with cake.
More than a century after the Mona Lisa was stolen, La Gioconda was smeared with cake this week in what appeared to be a protest against climate change. The 36-year-old man who staged this intervention had come to the museum in a wheelchair dressed as a woman. Some caught the aftermath of the event on video and posted it to social media. “There are people who are destroying the Earth,” the man said in one video, speaking in French. “All artists, think about the Earth. That’s why I did this. Think of the planet.” The man was immediately detained, and the Louvre has filed a criminal complaint.
Vincenzo Peruggia.
Why didn’t he just paint a mustache on her? They could have easily retouched it, and everyone would’ve gotten a good laugh.
I have never understood why the Mona Lisa is considered the greatest painting of all time.
“Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa may be one of the most beloved artworks in the world. “
Seen it up close and personal and it’s a meh. There are probably at least 1,000 other paintings I like better.
if read the 1911 theft you’ll see this: ...and then took the painting, which at the time was considered a minor work by Leonardo...
Now you know it wasn’t till it was stolen
Because some "journalist" said so in a published article?
I saw it at the Met in the mid 60's. It was unprotected, save for a velvet rope and one guard, on an easel about ten feet behind the rope. I was the only person, besides the guard, in the room. (Can't get more "up close and personal" than that!)
I've also seen it a couple of times at the Louvre, most recently in 2016. There I thought the most interesting thing was the gaggle of people trying to get a glimpse of the painting or to take a selfie with it while hardly any paid any attention to the several other daVinci's hanging nearby.
ML/NJ
You and me, both.
Like all art, its "greatness" is subjective and comes from various sources, those keepers of avant-garde and trend-setters in the art world.
Personally, I like this Vermeer--also at the Lourve--much better:
“Greatest” is subjective, but it is the best known. It’s in the Louvre, and France is the most visited country in the world. It was famously stolen and attacked. The enigmatic smile attracted a lot of attention among writers. It is an oil painting on a panel and not something on a ceiling high above. It’s also not decaying like Leonardo’s “Last Supper.” And Leonardo got his reputation before Rembrandt or Velasquez and it’s been hard to dislodge him from the Number 1 position.
I also like that painting (The Astronomer) much better. Not only is it more complex than Leonardo's opus, but it subtly shows the connection of science and God, portraying a book on astronomy that called on scientists to seek inspiration from God, and on the wall can be seen the Cornelius de Vos painting The Finding of Moses (c. 1635).
Same reason some people think Picasso, Rothko and Pollock painted actual "art." It's part of the trappings of elitism.
Tom Wolfe laws down the law on "modern art" in his book, "The Painted Word." Here's a snippet:
All these years I, like so many others, had stood in from of a thousand, two thousand, God-knows-how-many thousand Pollocks, de Koonigs, Newmans, Nolands, Rothkos, Rauschenbergs, Judds, Johnses, Olitskis, Louises, Stills, Frans Klines, Frankenthalers, Kellys and Frank Stellas, now squinting, now popping eye sockets wide open, now drawing back, now moving vcloser -- waiting, waiting, forever waiting for ... it ... for it to come into focus, namely, the visual reward (for so much effort) which must be there, which everyone (tout le monde) knew to be therre -- waiting for something to radiate directly from the painting on these invariably pure white walls, in this room, in this moment, into my own optic chiasma. All these years, in short, I had assumed that in art, if nowhere else, seeing is believing. Well -- how very shortsighted! Now, at last, on April 28, 1974, I could see. Not "seeing is believing," you ninny, but "believing is seeing," for Modern Art has become completely literary; the paintings and other works exist only to illustrate the text.Rich people buy art for more that it should be worth by any reasonable standard because it's a tax-free place to park their money. In the 1950s and 60s the CIA actually spread out tens of millions of dollars among well-placed art "aficionados" so they could buy modern art crap hoping it would cause the USSR to despair that our taste in "art" showed we were so "intellectual" and "cosmopolitan." Which is how modern art first got "monetized" on a grand scale.
As for the Mona Lisa, I've seen it in person and I can't tell if that's a smile or Bell's palsy. If I had seen it without knowing anything about it and you asked me to write a 100-word essay on what it looks like, I doubt I'd have mentioned any alleged "smile," even once. It's just not that extraordinary a piece of art (apart from being evidence of Leonardo's mastery of "sfumato"). The reasons(s) it's famous is because it was painted by someone extraordinarily famous, and because it has an exciting history."
When it was stolen in 1911, the art-loving Parisians breathed a giant group ... "Meh!." Up until then they'd never been much impressed with it and couldn't be bothered to shed a tear that it had been stolen. It wasn't until after it was recovered that she started becoming an art superstar.
The Froggies lent her to MOMAR in 1962 & 63. First Lady Jackie Kennedy looked at it and called it "the greatest painting in the world." And she was the most beautiful, stylish, most cosmopolitan woman on the face of the earth, so all the little speeple said, "Baa-aaa-aa-aaaa."
There's not even anywhere near consensus among art experts and historians that it's a real da Vinci. So whoever paid $400 million for it bought it speculating that there would never be test to disprove its authenticity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.