Posted on 05/26/2022 12:05:57 PM PDT by SpeedyInTexas
BREAKING: The Pentagon estimates that Russia has lost nearly 1,000 tanks, 350 artillery pieces, three dozen bomber fixed wing aircraft and over 50 helicopters in Ukraine
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
For the third time. Please read carefully
Name the top 10 conservative officers currently active in the military.
I don’t know the officers by name. But hundreds of thousands in the military are conservative.
If you believe anything the government or media says about either side, raise your hand…and then stick out your index finger and twirl it around by your temple.
Let me know where I can find real accurate news on this.
Your reading comprehension sucks.
Neither does anyone else. Welcome to the Light, Speedo.
10,000 tanks in storage and 8500 armored vehicles.
—
They had ~2500 working tanks before they invaded. Of the 10,000 in storage number, most have been stored in open air without maintenance for decades, and many of those are missing parts from turrets to engines. It is very likely that the T-64s, now being brought to the front for assault guns, were in covered storage and maintained for training. So you can stop with the BS numbers.
How Many Tanks Does Russia Really Have? And Where Are They?
Includes a brief description of Orc military unit conventions and example of how one unit had several name changes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHhgVrKJJoA&t=619s
Later they may dig out some T-55s and still later drag the few remaining T-34s out for an airing.
ORYX catalogs losses from both sides based on photographic evidence.
Oh wait, the RuZZia lovers don’t like that data because it shows so many RuZZian losses.
Absolutely.
Its the English language. Only language I can speak, but I find it difficult.
About the same amount of equipment Joe abandoned in Afghanistan.
Welcome to Free Republic and you’re fos.
The reason the NATO generals were able to reassess the damage after the war: NATO won.
Also interesting that the same people who call the Ukrainians nazis, are upset we bombed the Serbian nazis.
“I’ve seen some conservative estimates that say the Russians are spending about a billion per day. I don’t recall what their gas sales were to Europe, but they exceeded that. Still, it’s a lot of stuff they can’t easily replace while the embargo is in force. Take apart analysis says their stuff is full of components bought from the West. Apparently, their only tank manufacturer has shut down due to sanctions.”
I read that the Russians annually spend $80 billion on defense. If they are burning up $1 billion per day, they’re operating in the red now.
The marching orders were given at Davos the other day. Russia must be destroyed, then China. To save the planet. So says Soros.
“RIA Novosti.”
You know, I assume, that RIA Novosti is a Russian state-owned news agency, right? Think of it as being akin to Germany’s Der Sturmer in the 1930s and early 1940s. It can only print what the Kremlin tells it to print, or allows it to print.
Just sayin’.
“Russia must be destroyed, then China. “
Sounds good to me. Although destroyed is too strong. Demilitarized and denazified would be good.
Chinese nazis? Hum doesn’t quite fit.
Russia has a hell of a lot of tanks in “storage,” but they are generally used for the cannibalization of parts.
“Parachute in and fight yourself, you cowardly neocon keyboard warrior.”
Put you money where your mouth is, tough guy. Grab a rifle and get your ass down to our southern border and stop THAT invasion.
So, do you see how stupid your comment was?
For a $1000 cash, and control of the board, name the top 10 conservative officers currently active in the military.”
If we know their political affiliation, they are doing something wrong. So your challenge is stupid on its face.
You’re still triggered and following me around.
LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.