Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I had no idea but apparently the WHO are planning a pandemic treaty...
1 posted on 05/14/2022 12:18:57 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: RandFan

Was it back during Bush 1’s term that they tried something similar with the Law of The Sea Treaty?


2 posted on 05/14/2022 12:23:00 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Do we still have a Constitution when we have non-natural born citizens as President and VP?


3 posted on 05/14/2022 12:27:11 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin ( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Amendment10

...


4 posted on 05/14/2022 12:31:47 PM PDT by RandFan (For some reason I'm interested in politics, particularly the U.S. Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Article 6:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

This means that a ratified treaty can supersede the constitution according to the constitution.


5 posted on 05/14/2022 12:32:35 PM PDT by TennesseeProfessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Signing that treaty would definitely be unconstitutional, and the globalists would love to undermine it so don’t be surprised if our traitorous politicians try to sneak it through. We need more like Massie and Rand Paul in there to put an end to this treachery.


9 posted on 05/14/2022 12:40:28 PM PDT by jimwatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Do treaties no longer have to be voted on by the US Senate to be “valid”???


10 posted on 05/14/2022 12:40:29 PM PDT by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists - redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Sedition is right- question is, will any republicans have the backbone ot protect our country against such a blatant and seditious act as that? The left are attempting to subvert our sovereignty as a nation- that is sedition plain and simple-


11 posted on 05/14/2022 12:44:50 PM PDT by Bob434 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Bannon covered this yesterday with Michele Bachmann. Biden will offer 19 amendments to give the WHO rights to tell us what to do. This will happen later this month, May 26th I believe. Follow Michele Bachmann for details.

Bannon’s call to action, make phone calls. According to him, once this is done it cannot be undone regardless of who is in power come Nov. And it seems rep are sleeping……..as usual.


12 posted on 05/14/2022 12:45:34 PM PDT by Moe-Patrick (If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Biden/Obama are the culprits, by publishing amendments to rules the US agreed to, published to the Federal Register in January that cedes US medical power to Tedros, the CCP approved dictator. Xi, Putin, the UAE leader, and who know who, dying in time for the WEF conference after the UN May conference.

Stopthewho.com


14 posted on 05/14/2022 12:54:49 PM PDT by combat_boots (I be MAGA Kangz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

As I understand it, the “treaty” is a feint. It is actually a sovereignty-ending update to the “International Health Regulations” of the WHO that we have already agreed to follow that the are trying to get through in the next two weeks.


15 posted on 05/14/2022 12:57:11 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

America is plunging headlong into a globalist empire.

There’s a very few people, like Massie, who are aware of it and working against it


17 posted on 05/14/2022 12:57:14 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

We are in the middle of an op on many fronts.

Read the comments https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/05/13/tucker-carlson-explains-the-govt-created-subsidized-baby-formula-monopoly-and-current-shortages/


18 posted on 05/14/2022 12:57:41 PM PDT by combat_boots (I be MAGA Kangz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan
Revelation 17:12And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. 13These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
22 posted on 05/14/2022 1:02:12 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Treaty’s don’t override the second amendment…


34 posted on 05/14/2022 1:17:55 PM PDT by TalBlack (We have a Christian duty and a patriotic duty. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Dems don’t care about the Constitution. All they care about is getting power over the folks and taking their money to buy votes and remain in power.


36 posted on 05/14/2022 1:38:33 PM PDT by I want the USA back (A totally corrupt media willingly lies to protect a totally corrupt administration. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

The responses to Massie show how profoundly stupid the Left is.


37 posted on 05/14/2022 1:42:44 PM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Indeed. Art2 section 3 says how a treaty becomes enacted- by 2/3 consent of the Senate.
A treaty never exceeds authority compared to the constitution, but have authority equivalent to a statute and thusly like any law or statute, are subject to review as to constitutionality.

Furthermore, some treaties require Congressional action and subsequent laws to execute the terms of the parent treaty, others are self-executing, and obviously do not require funds to be appropriated by Congress. But remember, all spending at the fedgov level must be originated in the house, and a treaty ratified by the Senate that requires public funds to execute must require an appropriation....

No treaty can violate the Bill of Rights or the existent clauses in the constitution.


39 posted on 05/14/2022 1:46:55 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan; All

Treaties have Constitutional Force, as long as they do not conflict with the constitution.

If they conflict, the treaty is void.

And that’s why the NATO treaty is invalid and void.

67 Senators cannot declare war. They cannot even authorize the funds to FIGHT a war.


41 posted on 05/14/2022 1:49:11 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan
They'll never get 2/3 in the Senate anyway. Biden wants to sign it as an "Executive Agreement", not a treaty, and hope to persuade some courts that it is entitled to deference.

Guys like Breyer have bought into that logic in the past, but that view won't prevail with the current judiciary.

44 posted on 05/14/2022 1:52:31 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

thank god for massie & rand


45 posted on 05/14/2022 1:54:03 PM PDT by thinden (buckle up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson