Posted on 05/06/2022 6:30:12 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[Yo-Yo Note: This is a compilation of several Twitter threads by Will Chamberlain. I have created links to the images that he originally had in his posts. I didn't put the actual images into this post because it made Will's naration too hard to follow. Just click on the links to see the images that he is revering to in each segment.]
https://twitter.com/willchamberlain/status/1521685968939630592
Thread
Will Chamberlain
@willchamberlain
Meet Elizabeth Deutsch. She's currently a law clerk for Justice Breyer.
And, in my humble opinion, she's the most likely person to have leaked the draft Supreme Court opinion in Dobbs, purporting to overturn Roe v. Wade.
But first, a disclaimer:
I have no inside information. This thread is speculation, based almost entirely on publicly available information. I could easily be wrong.
Cool? Cool.
Her academic background isn't that uncommon for Supreme Court clerks. Yale undergrad, Yale law, and 2 British Master's degrees, from LSE and Cambridge.
Do note the Master's degree in Gender.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4UObCXEAEsFMS?format=jpg&name=small
Here's where things start to get interesting. Every law student has to write a note - a long legal research paper, usually making a novel argument about the law.
Elizabeth Deutsch wrote hers about reproductive rights and abortion.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4UWLsXwAAORGn?format=jpg&name=small
Specifically, she argued that Obamacare's non-discrimination provision should be interpreted to *force* Catholic hospitals to perform "emergency abortions."
Aggressive argument - and hey, law students make aggressive arguments.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4c3mTX0AE-9Jm?format=png&name=360x360
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4c3oIXIAA6vVr?format=png&name=900x900
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4c3olXMAELj0P?format=png&name=900x900
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4c3pzXwAAALJF?format=png&name=900x900
While in law school she wrote a NYT op-ed about reproductive rights. Sensing a theme here.
Her career page on LinkedIn doesn't reveal that much...until we start digging a little further.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4UfwUXwAE28w4?format=jpg&name=small
First, thanks to her NYT wedding announcement (of course), we know that she clerked for judge Nina Pillard.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4Y4GMXMAIDmD4?format=jpg&name=360x360
Pillard was one of the DC Circuit judges appointed by Obama and forced through by Harry Reid blowing up the filibuster.
She's stridently pro-choice. Perhaps not shocking.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4U_L2XwAEiNqf?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4U_neXEAAXMGR?format=png&name=medium
After her clerkships, she got a Gruber fellowship at the ACLU for a full year.
What was she working on?
You guessed it. Abortion and reproductive rights.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4bSDoWUAIj2-G?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4bSEbXEAAJVbG?format=jpg&name=large
But none of this proves anything. Yes, Deutsch's career seems pretty focused on abortion. But without some connection to Josh Gerstein (the journalist who received the leak opinion) there would be no reason to suspect her.
Let's go back to that NYT wedding announcement.
"The bride and groom met at Yale. She is a lawyer. He is a journalist.
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1521547376321712129/vvoRaWyL?format=jpg&name=small
Isaac Arnsdorf just got hired by the Washington Post as a national political reporter. (Of course he's on the Trump beat).
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4ZOS8XwAEkYyt?format=jpg&name=small
But where has he written in the past?
Oh, look. He wrote for POLITICO.
SHARING A BYLINE WITH JOSH GERSTEIN.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4dSRDWYAQYUj3?format=png&name=900x900
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4dSSFX0AAznTj?format=png&name=900x900
Looks like Gerstein and they are still bros - chatting on Twitter, interacting as recently as last year.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4dSk9XMAEdV4W?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4dSl_WYAAoMGB?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR4dSm7XEAQkUFZ?format=jpg&name=medium
So, to conclude:
We have a currently-serving Supreme Court law clerk whose career has been almost solely focused on abortion.
She wrote her law school note on abortion.
She wrote op-eds about reproductive rights.
She spent a year working on abortion for the ACLU.
She clerked for a stridently pro-choice appellate judge.
And it just so happens that her husband is a journalist, who shared bylines with Josh Gerstein at Politico, and it looks like they are still buds.
I don't know that Elizabeth Deutsch leaked the draft opinion.
But I certainly think someone who has spent much of their academic and professional life fighting to expand the right to get an abortion could be desperate enough to do so.
FIN
“Can journalists and lawyers breed?”
Yes, but only by anal sex!
This…
Not if they are in their graves
“this might point Roberts in the right direction.”
U.S. Marshals and the FBI will polygraph everyone in the court. They will find the person/persons who leaked the opinion.
“Leaker also looking at a seven-figure book and movie deal.”
If prosecuted, a judge can disallow any future profits to be recognized from the illegal and unethical act, e.g., book or movie deals.
The left will no doubt make the leaker their hero.
‘I’m still working on my undergrad in gender.’>>> I’m changing my major to “Bikini Inspector”
My first thought was it’s an angry white woman who works for one of the dissenting justices.
Should have an investigation, question her and others as ‘person of interest’…ask if she leaked the documents…1 admission, 2 denial/perjury, 3 lawyer up and take the fifth…which would confirm her guilt imo…
Whoever made the leak, was ready to fall upon the sword “for the good of democracy”, but what a perverted form of democracy that must be.
One person, one vote, one way, one time, then the grand glorious future is forever tied to that irreversible and irrevocable decision.
This leak was MEANT to try to alter the tentative decisions of at least five of the Justices involved. Demonstrations and threats upon the persons of the suspected supporters are the means by which this vote is to be changed.
Justice Breyer has nothing to lose, at this point. If this leak was done in any way at his behest, it remains a most destructive parting shot, one likely to do as much damage to both sides in this disagreement.
Nobody wins. Not the US Supreme Court, not the activists, not the still unborn children, not the pro-lifers, and certainly not the public. The outcome shall forever be tainted.
probably by getting and additional masters in baiting ( subcategory of fishing)
Waterboard Josh Gerstein.
A Hero Woman who lead the fight. She will be made a saint in the religion of the left. This woman will be given a medal when Pelosi is re-elected when the Democrats keep both House and Senate. That and their RINO fifth column will keep Trump out and put in a law that makes abortion the Law of the Land.
“How does one become a master of one’s gender?”
You use your gender weapon only for good.
I have not completely mastered my own gender, much less the other 56.
I’ve seen this as well. This was all planned anyway whether it was her or amit jain.
The London School of Economics is very pink.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.