Posted on 04/29/2022 5:25:20 PM PDT by foundedonpurpose
The USA just gave Russia an excuse to seize all of Ukraine
Abraham Stein Apr 25
The United States has just given Russia a valid reason to take complete control of all Ukraine. Today, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Diplomat Anthony Blinken paid a visit to the Ukrainian president Zelensky in Kyiv, it was their first visit with Joe Biden as American President. The visit made it clear that the United States is directly involved in the conflict with the Russians, and the comments from Secretary of Defense Austin makes it abundantly clear that only a full Russian takeover of Ukraine will bring peace. A partial Russian takeover will produce more war.
Weaken Russia
Austin is the leader of the United Sates military and he made it very clear what the U.S. intends to do in Ukraine.
“We want to see Russia weakened to the degree that it can’t do the kinds of things that it has done in invading Ukraine,” Austin said at the news conference. “So it has already lost a lot of military capability. And a lot of its troops, quite frankly. And we want to see them not have the capability to very quickly reproduce that capability.”
Austin’s words can be read as a direct admission of war between the United States and Russia, it is obvious there will be no peace in the region unless the Kremlin controls all of Ukraine. The United States is throwing fuel on the fire, they have given an unstable hothead (Ukraine president Zelensky) a free reign to do as he pleases. Zelensky is not seeking peace, he is an egoist demanding ever increasing ransom money from the United States and heavy weapons. No amount of money will ever satisfy Zelensky, the U.S has made the mistake of getting in bed with the Ukrainian president, now they are stuck with him. Lloyd Austin and Anthony Blinken told the American people last year that all was well in Afghanistan and that the Taliban was “no threat” to the Afghan army, they were dumbfoundedly wrong. Austin and Blinken appear to be wrong again in Ukraine.
Austin words today might be read by the Kremlin as a direct threat to Russia, in all the years of cold war between Russian President Putin and the United States, Putin has never said that he wanted to “weaken the United States militarily”. It is clear the U.S is going in for a long war, which could trigger a nuclear response from one side.
All or nothing
For 70 years Ukraine was ruled by the Soviet Union and the region was at virtual peace.
The words today from Anthony Blinken, while not as direct as Austin, was also highly disrespectful.
He said, according to the BBC: "The bottom line is this. We don't how the rest of this war will unfold, but we do know that a sovereign, independent Ukraine will be around a lot longer than Vladimir Putin is on the scene. And our support for Ukraine going forward will continue and it will continue until we see final success."
Blinken words made it clear that the age of American-Russian diplomacy is finished, he made it clear that war will continue, and the only option is for Ukraine to win. The meeting today left no plans hidden, it is clear the Russian federation must take all of Ukraine, it is the only way to assure peace. Ukraine was under the Soviet Union for 70 years and there was never the threat of world war, as it is today with Ukraine under NATO control. A rogue, untamed, Western controlled Ukraine led by an erratic Zelensky makes the whole world unsafe. Zelensky and NATO will never stop pushing for conflict, unless Russia seizes all of Ukraine there is a real threat of Zelensky triggering world war 3.
Reading helps.
..............
Great Post, lets all defend the righteousness's of Queernation!
.......
Funny, I thought Obama was the antichrist. Sneaky bastard that he is.
Sorry but your moving goalposts, the USSR and Russia are separate nations so most the events listed are moot
And you are helping leftist radical globalists like Biden, Soros and the Clintons by denying Russia the right to defend itself. Russia isn’t taxing me, censoring me, forcing my kids to transgender, calling me racist for being white, but Washington DC sure is.
Who cares about what the leftist pundits have to say. I am looking for actual information.
And you apparently haven't noticed that I regularly post information obtained from the Twitter servers.
And your reading is sloppy. I cited the Wikipedia article on the Donbass deaths as a source for links to original sources, not for its conclusions.
Back to the simple question. How many people do you think were killed in the Donbass fighting? Is the material posted in that Wikipedia article wrong?
You keep dodging the question, but if you actually believe the estimated death total published by Wikipedia is wrong you must have some basis for that belief. Or you are just spewing nonsense again for some reason.
So is the approximately 14,000 people killed wrong or not?
From a guy who is always wrong...
.......
Well, he certainly isn't as bad as you or Biden, he pulled the same crap, and we all know what kind of a guy Biden is.
Your proxy war is failing, terrorists , Uzav, and their hostages and foreign agents are starting to crawl out of the elaborate compound under the steel mill at Mariupol. Drone footage.
Mariupol - The Battle for Azovstal, April 27th to 30th Update (Special Reportage)
.......
Well, he certainly isn't as bad as you or Biden, he pulled the same crap, and we all know what kind of a guy Biden is.
Your proxy war is failing, terrorists , Uzav, and their hostages and foreign agents are starting to crawl out of the elaborate compound under the steel mill at Mariupol. Drone footage.
Mariupol - The Battle for Azovstal, April 27th to 30th Update (Special Reportage)
"They were attacked because they attacked Eastern Ukraine for 8 years killing 20,000 civilians, with the loss of 10,000 soldiers."
You should contact the Foreign Minister of the LPR and ask her why she said "According to our data, we can confirm more than 1,700 deaths of civilians (during the years of fighting in the LPR territory); of those, 35 are underage children,” Soroka said adding that 3,365 people were wounded."
Do you think she and the LPR government are actually Soros stooges working for the CIA to cover up the deaths in the LPR?
Putin would want to know that, so you should send him a memo.
What absurd, ludicrous, balderdash irrational propaganda! Denying Russia the right to defend itself? As if it is Ukraine, NATO and the US that are actually the threat to a peaceful Russia, versus the exact opposite. After the collapse of the Soviet Union the US defense budget went into a long period of decline, finally decreasing over 33% NATO also decreased significantly, Clinton's adventure into Kosovo (which was disrespectful to Russia) notwithstanding.
It is Putin's belligerence that resulted in the increase of defense spending, and if you think the West is the aggressor against a peaceful Russia rather than recalcitrant Putin seeking to be the conqueror of the West then you are deceived like the pro-communist e liberals of the 60's were.
"Russia isn’t taxing me, censoring me, forcing my kids to transgender, calling me racist for being white, but Washington DC sure is."
Which is simply irrational reasoning. Meaning since Washington is the enemy of conservatives, and Putin is against Washington, then you side with one who regularly threatens to devastate America en toto. Might as well side with China as well.
Instead, you should oppose both dictator Putin as well as the Left, and it remains that by supporting Putin you are supporting supporting an anti-Christ dictator who has no business invading Ukrainians and along with China is the primary military threat to the West, while liberals (who usually blame America for the world's armies) work to destroy it from within.
"Funny, I thought Obama was the antichrist. Sneaky bastard that he is. "
Note the word "an" as in an anti-Christ dictator. The Left here longs to have and exercise Putin's power. For now, it only has a poison pen and power to censure dissenters, and economically sanction them, but which is a precursor of more persecution and prosecution to come.
"Speaking strictly and only for myself (as always), I endorse Bernard Sanders for U.S. President.
I also endorse Donald Trump, who was never short of hair product, and whose ex-wives likely can't sew to save their lives, though he makes up for that by driving terror and panic into the Establishment in a manner not seen in my great country for probably over 100 years.
Either of these guys would shake up what needs to be shaken up.
Either would throw up some tariffs and let come what may.
And either would be great for U.S.-Russia relations. (Probably Trump more so, but I'll take what I can get.)"
I corrected myself. Didn’t u read it?. Yes reading helps
No, it's not.
I see a Wikipedia cite and I immediately block all input after that.
There's a trick to the Internet that most people don't master - and especially people our age:
Ignore anything that's irrelevant.
Much of the content on a typical Internet web page is there to distract, which it does for older folk who were taught to read everything.
You can scream about your garbage Wikipedia page on the Dumbass all day long.
I'll just ignore your garbage "data".
Matter of fact, I'm beginning to think that YOU'RE irrelevant, and can be ignored.
“Every lying bluecheck POS on Twitter who was part of “The Resistance Against Trump” is on board the Slava Ukraini train.”
So u would be against mom and apple pie if the Trump resistance was for it.
Yep that’s some topnotch thinking right there.
You're about as sharp as a mouthbreathing Twitter bluecheck.
Reading your posts here can also cause IQ point loss.
And notice you are busy getting all emotional but you still can't just answer a simple question. How many people do you think died in the Donbass fighting from 2014 until just before the Russian invasion?
Is there a reason you can't answer that question?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.