Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Yes, the course was there before they were BUT and this is a big but, the course was poorly designed if the balls were flying outside the course.

So the fact the course was there first is irrelevant. In any case their balls were flying into some else's property.

The course could have either redesigned or they could have bought that property so no one would be harmed but they refused to do so until they were sued.

So the property owners were in the right, the course was in the wrong.

20 posted on 04/24/2022 5:22:50 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (It is better to light a single flame thrower then curse the darkness. A bunch of them is better yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear

You could blame everyone involved really. City should have seen this coming when they approved the course. Developer should have seen this coming when they were building the homes and worked something out with the course. If the course owners knew ahead of time where home lots were going to end up, they should have designed differently. The home buyers should have known their yard was going to be a target.

Stupid human tricks


67 posted on 04/25/2022 5:26:11 AM PDT by Pollard (Who stole my tagline?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson