Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton urges judge to THROW OUT Trump's lawsuit claiming she 'colluded' to 'cripple' his 2016 Presidential campaign because it is has 'no merit' and is 'being used as a fundraising tool'
Daily Mail ^ | 4/20/22 | Elizabeth Elkind

Posted on 04/21/2022 12:36:33 AM PDT by Libloather

Hillary Clinton on Wednesday is asking that a legal challenge filed against her by Donald Trump be dismissed on the grounds that it has 'no merit.'

The former first lady's court filing compared Trump's lawsuit to a 'fundraising tool, a press release or a list of political grievances' but said it has no place 'as a lawsuit, and should be dismissed with prejudice.'

The ex-president sued his 2016 Democratic opponent and dozens of others in March for an 'unthinkable plot' to 'weave a false narrative' that he was colluding with a hostile foreign power during that election cycle to 'cripple Trump's bid for presidency.'

Clinton 'vigorously denies' Trump's accusations, but even if they were true, argued that he 'fails to plead any cognizable legal causes of action,' the filing obtained by Axios states.

Her attorneys also claimed that some of the Republican's accusations -- including conspiring with the FBI and Christopher Steele on the British ex-spy's infamous dossier -- would run out of the statute of limitations even if Trump had a case.

They cite proof his allegations were made 'no later than October 29, 2017, when [Trump] publicly asserted that Clinton was responsible for the Steele Dossier, “the Comey fix,” and “phony” stories on his collusion with Russia, and claimed the facts of the alleged conspiracy were “pouring out”.'

'But notwithstanding his rousing, all-caps call to action, Plaintiff waited four years, four months, and twenty-four days before filing suit. His delay renders each of his claims untimely,' they state.

Clinton's lawyers compared Trump's March lawsuit to 'a press release or a list of political grievances'.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; History; Local News
KEYWORDS: 2016; collusion; conspiracyping; criminal; crookedhillary; hillary; lawsuit; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Hostage
No Statute of Limitations on Fraud.

With murder, that's generally true but for fraud? In what jurisdiction is that true? Please, be specific.

21 posted on 04/21/2022 3:37:23 AM PDT by Ahithophel (Communication is an art form susceptible to sudden technical failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
Hillary was a candidate for one reason...well two...

She was the biggest money raiser. They were assured the women's vote...which was how Bubba won....and she was assured the Black vote...which is how Bubba won.

But she forgot that women were cats and might just not like her and totally forgot about the white man...and that's how she lost.

22 posted on 04/21/2022 3:39:03 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: odawg
Hillary personally gave $1 million dollars every year to the foundation as a write off...

And I believe she filed amended returns for 5 years...I think this was her personal filing....forgot.

23 posted on 04/21/2022 3:43:27 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Satans prom date.


24 posted on 04/21/2022 3:44:25 AM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: odawg

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-clinton-foundation/clinton-charities-refile-six-years-of-tax-returns-to-amend-errors-idUSKCN0T608W20151117


25 posted on 04/21/2022 3:44:56 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Trillian

In a sane world she’d have been legally executed.


26 posted on 04/21/2022 3:58:37 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Put her in a straight jacket and lock her up. Really, she ran a coup against a president and should be hanged.


27 posted on 04/21/2022 4:05:43 AM PDT by Vision (Elections are one day. Reject "Chicago" vote harvesting. Election Reform Now. Obama is an evildoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision

She did indeed...And both of Trump’s impeachments should be reversed. They were based on false information.


28 posted on 04/21/2022 4:24:02 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Yep. Not sure what it is but will be something.


29 posted on 04/21/2022 4:35:01 AM PDT by glimmerman70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Trillian
"In a sane world, she’d be in jail."

In a just world, Hellary would have been tried, convicted, and sentenced. And today her carcass would be slowly rotting off of the noose.

30 posted on 04/21/2022 4:40:29 AM PDT by Carl Vehse (A proud member of the LGBFJB community)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Belly up to the bar, like a Man, Hillary.


31 posted on 04/21/2022 4:47:36 AM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg

What you say is partially true....the Clinton Foundation took in hundreds of millions. They also spent hundreds of millions.

Remember the trouble at the beginning of the Obama period, when Sec of State Clinton wanted to hire Blumenthal as her ‘helper’ and the Obama team said ‘no’ to a gov’t job, and then later ‘no’ to a contractor gov’t job. So what few realized....she desperately needed his skills, so they hired Blumenthal through the Foundation. By the time you figured salary, health insurance, social security taxes, etc...he was probably in the $350k a year range.

There were all kinds of expenditures like that. If you asked them where they stood at the end of 2016? I bet they had less than $10-million left in the fund.


32 posted on 04/21/2022 4:50:38 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: glimmerman70

I don’t want to ask what crazy thing will happen next.

For sure.

The world keeps choosing and embracing bizarre things.


33 posted on 04/21/2022 5:02:25 AM PDT by SaveFerris (The Lord, The Christ and The Messiah: Jesus Christ of Nazareth - http://www.BiblicalJesusChrist.Com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Good thing I’m not on some sort of nut-job conspiracy ping list!

😜😜😜 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑

Keep an eye on the man and the dog. I think they’re definitely working together!

🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑


34 posted on 04/21/2022 5:08:54 AM PDT by SaveFerris (The Lord, The Christ and The Messiah: Jesus Christ of Nazareth - http://www.BiblicalJesusChrist.Com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Desperation of a cornered rat. Durham has uncovered, and verified enough evidence to nail her. She’s feeling cornered and desperate.
Soon, the attorney/client privilege case will be lost, and things will get interesting. Pleading the 5th will fail.


35 posted on 04/21/2022 5:19:41 AM PDT by Fireone (When they pry them from my cold, dead, unvaccinated hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“Nice robe you have there Judge. Be a shame if something happened to it.”


36 posted on 04/21/2022 5:34:57 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trillian

Well then trump should have investigated her but he didn’t.


37 posted on 04/21/2022 5:37:04 AM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

>> ‘But notwithstanding his rousing, all-caps call to action, Plaintiff waited four years, four months, and twenty-four days before filing suit. His delay renders each of his claims untimely,’

Yep, the old “What difference, at this point, does it really make?” defense.


38 posted on 04/21/2022 5:48:58 AM PDT by Chicory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Give her a fair trial and when she is found guilty, Lock Her Up.


39 posted on 04/21/2022 5:50:36 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maris Crane

You are not wrong, in general.

There can be, however, sly arguments that assert the new findings could/should have been known before they were actually known. Generally, such can be dismissed unless proven they were premeditated somehow.


40 posted on 04/21/2022 5:54:19 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson