Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Protein boosts height growth in girls (More = taller, less = shorter - Does not work with boys)
Medical Xpress / University of Bonn / The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism ^ | Apr. 7, 2022 | Yifan Hua et al

Posted on 04/07/2022 3:54:00 PM PDT by ConservativeMind

Quite a few young men would like to increase their height. However, a study by nutritionists shows that they do not benefit from increased protein intake in terms of their adult height. In contrast, young women often see it as problematic when their height significantly exceeds 1.80 meters. Here, during growth, a protein intake adapted to the recommendations can even cause a reduction of a few centimeters.

While an increase in protein intake had no effect on body height in the boys and young men, a clear relationship was found in the girls. According to the scientists' calculations, an average increase of about seven grams of protein daily above the intake recommendations leads on average to an increase in height of one centimeter. "If no increase in height is desired, girls may even achieve a reduction in their later adult height by a few centimeters during growth by adjusting their protein intake to the recommendations, i.e. by not unnecessarily raising their protein intake," says Remer.

In boys, there are interactions with sex hormones

Even at intakes clearly above requirements, protein still has significant growth-promoting effects in girls, according to the data. In principle, protein intake should not be markedly higher than recommendations, such as 48 grams per day for 15- to 17-year-old female adolescents, the researchers said.

However, in reality, daily protein intake for many children is considerably higher, in some cases by 1.7 to 2 times. "Possible long-term consequences of correspondingly high protein intakes have not yet been satisfactorily examined," says Prof. Remer. "Only for bone stability have we been able to observe positive relations with increased protein intake in past studies, provided that the fruit and vegetable intake was not too low and thus the diet-dependent acid load was not too high."

(Excerpt) Read more at medicalxpress.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: diet; females; height; nutrition; protein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: bunkerhill7

All the girls in my class growing up for 13 years were shorter than the shortest boy, except for two girls; they were the tallest girls.They both had millionaire fathers. They lived in mansions at the beach on the lake. I wonder why they were the tallest girls....duhhhhhhh


21 posted on 04/07/2022 7:10:09 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 (That`s 464 people per square foot! Is this corrrect..it was NYC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7; ConservativeMind

You wrote:

“Flawed study. Height during growth depends upon genetics and the amount of exposure to sunshine, the Vitamin D kick.”

I wrote:

“That is partly true, and partly false:...”

Then you wrote:

“If all growth factors... are not accounted for then it is a flawed study.”


It is you who made a simplistic, categorical assertion. I was responding to that error.

I never said it was not a flawed study. I said that your original assertion was partly true, and partly false.

It indeed was partly true, and partly false: You admitted as much in your response by acknowledging that there were many factors involved (i.e., not just “genetics” and “amount of exposure to sunshine”!).

Your statement completely disregarded diet, digestion, and assimilation, among other things. Sunshine and genetics do not make D3 without the necessary dietary precursors and proper digestion and assimilation.

Respond to what I wrote - not to what I did not write.


22 posted on 04/07/2022 7:14:42 PM PDT by YogicCowboy (I know what I like, and like what I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
1.8 meters equals 5’9”

No!

1" = 2.54 cm exactly!

180 cm = 70.86"

That makes 180 cm just under 5'11".

23 posted on 04/07/2022 7:52:14 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Please please please you girls eat a lot of protein. I love lovely long legged ladies but alas I an 73 and married. Do it for my grandsons. LOL


24 posted on 04/07/2022 8:40:26 PM PDT by cpdiii (CANE CUTTER-DECKHAND-ROUGHNECK-OILFIELD CONSULTANT-GEOLOGIST-PILOT-PHARMACIST )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

I agree!


25 posted on 04/07/2022 8:41:25 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: YogicCowboy

Sorry about that.


26 posted on 04/08/2022 2:25:06 AM PDT by bunkerhill7 (That`s 464 people per square foot! Is this corrrect..it was NYC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: YogicCowboy
Respond to what I wrote

You don't give any orders around here, Yogi.

27 posted on 04/09/2022 4:42:48 PM PDT by humblegunner (Ain't drownin', Just wavin'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson