Posted on 03/27/2022 9:36:26 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The history of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) is highly checkered, with moments of greatness alternating with periods of failure and corruption. Sadly, as Vladimir Putin has attacked Ukraine and created a humanitarian crisis of epic proportions, the ROC is writing another dark chapter.
While other Christian organizations have spoken out boldly against Putin’s war, the ROC has remained silent — and complicit. Their moral error is so egregious that the World Council of Churches has no real choice. Just as other global organizations have barred Russian participation, so should the Russian Orthodox Church be expelled from membership.
Before the socialist revolution of 1917, the ROC’s main priority seemed to be accumulating wealth and power rather than caring for its believers. As a result, the roofs of churches shimmered with gold. At the same time, peasants, workers and the poor in cities and throughout the country went without and even starved.
However, a generation later, when Hitler attacked, Russia had to buy weapons from the United States and Great Britain to defend itself. In response, the ROC rehabilitated its image by donating some of its gold to support the state's efforts. Consequently, following World War II, the Soviet regime, despite its general hostility to organized religion, still viewed the Church somewhat more favorably. But this alliance came at a high and profoundly corrosive price: the state's security apparatus, the KGB, penetrated all the levels and structures within the Orthodox Church.
This development had tremendous implications for the ecumenical movement. In 1961, in the middle of the Cold War, the World Council of Churches (WCC) held its Third General Assembly in New Delhi, India. At the beginning of the assembly, black limousines brought a ROC delegation from the Soviet embassy. This church delegation may have been received with great pomp by the world ecumenical movement, but sharp observers sensed something was wrong. Among the ROC delegates were agents of the KGB. These clerical spies reported back to Moscow on the activities during the assembly. They also ensured that ROC participants would be answering to a higher power — and not a divine one.
Thus, the way was opened for ROC leaders with KGB ties to attain positions within the WCC. For example, a Russian archbishop became a member of the WCC Central Committee; there is now ample evidence he was also a KGB operative. Such deep penetration of the WCC happened repeatedly, as the KGB successfully carried out its strategy to infiltrate the WCC structures thoroughly.
Not coincidentally, the WCC directed its anti-arms protests against Western weapons but said nothing about Soviet nuclear-powered missiles in Eastern and Central Europe. As Ernest Lefever of the Ethics and Public Policy Center has documented, the WCC began to provide financial support for various revolutions around this time, even helping to arm guerrillas fighting in numerous countries worldwide — although WCC leadership later stopped taking such actions.
I experienced the impact of Christian groups’ friendliness to authoritarian socialism in my home country of Czechoslovakia, which the Soviets invaded in 1968 while I was a university student. Communists infiltrated both Catholic and Protestant groups, and some pro-communist trends persisted in the Czech ecumenical movement even after the revolution of 1989. For example, after Czech church groups organized financial collections in 2006 to support persecuted Christians in Cuba, a WCC representative visited Prague's Ecumenical Council of Churches. During this visit, this person falsely claimed that a WCC delegation had recently visited Cuba without observing any persecution of local Christians.
The ROC remains influential in today's ecumenical movement, often — and successfully — demanding various concessions. Patriarch Kirill, the current ROC primate in Moscow, likes to be photographed with Putin, who has been unstinting in showing him his favor. Both seem to believe in the value of reuniting church and state. Putin makes a great show of kissing an icon in the church, and in return, he receives loud approval of his regime from ROC leadership.
The current Russian-Ukrainian war has fully revealed this horrible compact between Putin and Kirill. Furthermore, the war also has a religious dimension. The Russian Orthodox Church would like to absorb the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which in 2019 achieved its independence from Moscow after the Ecumenical Patriarch of Istanbul recognized its autonomy. But the religious component goes far beyond Kirill’s desired reunification.
Various parties have called on Kirill to speak out against the unprovoked invasion. His previous silence implied he already tacitly supported the mad President Putin's intentions toward Ukraine. Still, his more recent comments confirmed that he not only supports Putin but also has his own motivations to justify the murderous aggression actively.
In a February 27 sermon, the Patriarch said, “God forbid that the present political situation in fraternal Ukraine so close to us should be aimed at making the evil forces that have always strived against the unity of Rus' and the Russian Church gain the upper hand.” As Paul Elie, a senior fellow of the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs at Georgetown University, observes, Kirill has now explicitly cast the conflict as “a culture war — a holy war — between religious traditionalism and liberalism.”
In a rare media interview, Bartholomew of Constantinople severely rebuked Russia for waging war against coreligionists. Later, in a written statement, he demanded that Putin “immediately stop any act of violence, anything that spreads pain and death.” If the WCC cares about peace, it must not allow such behavior among its members. The ROC should not be permitted to continue as a WCC member until it turns away from this false path of religious nationalism.
And that, Charlie Brown, is why we don’t have a State religion. Religions are always contaminated by close association with government.
And that, Charlie Brown, is why we don’t have a State religion. Religions are always contaminated by close association with government.
___________________________________________
Yeah, thank goodness we only have Activist Media, Woke Multi-national corporations, and the Entertainment Industry in close association with our government.
The act of consecration by Pope Francis was: “To your Immaculate Heart we solemnly entrust and consecrate ourselves, the Church and all humanity, especially Russia and Ukraine.”
But consecrate or convert to what? Christ?
So we had a Vatican II pope, who promotes Vatican 2 even though it promotes heresies while he attacks the true Traditional Latin Mass consecrating Russia, ostensibly to convert, while Vatican II also teaches and recognizes the Orthodox as valid sister Churches with an authentic episcopate and sacraments.
Two diametrically opposed and opposite belief systems that hit head on when he made the consecration. Which is true then? Vatican 2 or the consecration?
Well, none of those can tell you that you have to act some way because that’s what the Lord wants and you’ll go to Hell if you don’t read this anti-racist book.
” Religions are always contaminated by close association with government.”
And vice versa.
+1
+1
Consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, just as it says. This means that Mary, the Mother of God, will especially pray for Russia and Ukraine.
We ask that Russia convert, to turn away from sin, just as we each should always do, even Ukraine. We ask for protection for Ukraine, but protection against “the wickedness and snares of the devil” for Russia and all the rest of us as well.
Yes, the Catholic Church teaches that the Orthodox have valid sacraments. This is because the acts of consecration and ordination have not been altered to render them invalid, and the line of succession, whereby the laying on of His hands onto the Apostles has been passed down. This had always been the stance of the CC.
It does not mean the Orthodox are in good standing, according to the Catholic Church. It’s like saying someone is a good driver even if he doesn’t have a license: it’s not the license that makes him a good driver.
I don’t think this is a collision: even a stopped clock...
Government seeks to have religion on its side. Many religions willingly comply. Few resist the power. One that did is Pastor Artur Pawlowski in Calgary.
Red Herrings on your part.
Other countries are predominantly Orthodox yet other countries weren’t consecrated. Mother Mary hasn’t called for any to be consecrated except for Rusdia.
Why if they don’t need to convert according to V2?
If they need to then other Orthodox countries need to convert and thus the consecration is a call for conversion by Mother Mary.
Thus Vatican II is false, heretical, and I’m not Orthodox and the TLM is valid, which pagan Pachapapa Francis attacks.
Maybe tge conversion was from communism? And this consecration is not related to Fatima? (Altho they did make it look that way!)
When I see the errors that have been spread throughout the world by Russia, I see communism, not Orthodoxy.
Well, none of those can tell you that you have to act some way because that’s what the Lord wants and you’ll go to Hell if you don’t read this anti-racist book.
_________________________________________________
Oh Good! That should make people feel a lot better when they are getting banned from social media, losing their jobs, getting sued, and generally being ostracized from society for expressing their views openly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.