Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Case CLOSED: Attorney Harmeet K Dhillon looks at KBJ's refusal to define a woman from a LEGAL perspective in d*mning thread
Twitchy.com ^ | 3/23/2022 | Sam J.

Posted on 03/23/2022 10:22:20 AM PDT by NetAddicted

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Sometimes I can copy the tweets that are displayed amongst Twitchy's commentary, but it's easier and clearer to read article at Twitchy.
1 posted on 03/23/2022 10:22:20 AM PDT by NetAddicted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

what


2 posted on 03/23/2022 10:23:06 AM PDT by devane617 (RUN FOR LOCAL ELECTED OFFICE! COUNCIL,SCHOOL BOARD, ETC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted
There should be universal outrage that an individual attempting to get approved for the Supreme Court refuses to define what a "woman" is.

We are not a serious country anymore.
3 posted on 03/23/2022 10:26:21 AM PDT by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

I heard she’ll probably get confirmed even if no R’s vote for her. All she needs is a simple majority vote now due to a 2017 rule change.


4 posted on 03/23/2022 10:26:50 AM PDT by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Won’t stop the Assistant Democrats from voting to confirm.

And apparently there isn’t much Assistant Democrats can do that will stop people from re-electing them.

Amnesty is a death sentence for the rule of law and this country and yet Flimsey Grahamnesty and Micro Rubio still have lots of people voting for them.

Trump endorsing them is antithetical to MAGA.


5 posted on 03/23/2022 10:28:02 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin ( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted
… as we now know, biology has nothing to do with being a "woman,"

This has bad ramifications for Y chromosomes!

6 posted on 03/23/2022 10:29:47 AM PDT by immadashell (New Planned Parenthood slogan: Black Babies’ Lives Don't Matter!c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Linda Grahamnesty went after her, on her radical p0rn background, today, too.

Now....if Midge will only give the Rs permission to vote AGAINST this far left, sicko, radical.

Hopefully, there is NOW enough push back. We’ll see.


7 posted on 03/23/2022 10:31:11 AM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Simple answer is any human being with XX pair chromosomes is a woman and those with XY chromosome pairs is a male. Intent or desire to work around that reality is a mental state of gender psychosis. If that’s one’s adult choice, have at it. I want my Zebra to have polka-dots.


8 posted on 03/23/2022 10:31:17 AM PDT by blackdog (Today's "disinformation" most often turns out to be tomorrow's facts. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Yep, refusal to answer makes her look as dumb as she is.


9 posted on 03/23/2022 10:32:06 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted
When this woke nominee refused to define "woman", saying she's not a biologist, I would have followed with:

"So, you will recuse yourself from any cases involving biology?"

"You will recuse yourself from any cases involving "gender equity" or "when does life begin?" because you're not a biologist?"

10 posted on 03/23/2022 10:32:22 AM PDT by G Larry (Tolerance will rise until intelligent people are banned from thinking to avoid offending imbeciles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

If she had just said, when asked to define a woman “Lindsay graham” she might be a shoe in lol


11 posted on 03/23/2022 10:33:08 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Any senator who votes for Jackson to become a SCOTUS justice has given aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States. The Constitution has a word for that.


12 posted on 03/23/2022 10:33:19 AM PDT by Carl Vehse (A proud member of the LGBFJB community)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
There should be universal outrage that an individual attempting to get approved for the Supreme Court refuses to define what a "woman" is.

Its a logical consequence of decades of neo-marxist ideologues and central-planners in Washington DC attempting to redefine and re-write individual rights expressed in the Constitution, in as collective, political, group-based rights.

13 posted on 03/23/2022 10:33:46 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Ans also,ask,that she answer whether she is a woman or not, and if so, demand that she answer what makes her a woman.


14 posted on 03/23/2022 10:34:10 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

I would have followed up with, If you were to take vitamins, would you take women’s vitamins or men’s vitamins and how would you know?


15 posted on 03/23/2022 10:36:33 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

The Constitution has three words that say Obama could not be President. (or Harris VP)

It’s now a relic in a glass case.


16 posted on 03/23/2022 10:37:07 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin ( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted
How hard is it to simply state
"A Woman is a human that has two X chromosomes in their cells"?

17 posted on 03/23/2022 10:38:43 AM PDT by redcatcherb412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Of course she has opinions on these issues, they will be plainly known after she’s on the court.


18 posted on 03/23/2022 10:39:17 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

2008 wants its debate back. I noticed you didn’t mention songbird McCain who some claim was NBC because he was born in Panamá


19 posted on 03/23/2022 10:42:32 AM PDT by newzjunkey (“We Did It Joe!” -The Taliban / “Thanks Joe!” -Putin )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

She didn’t sound dumb, but Dhillon is correct: she is political. Maybe activist? She’s also a liar, about CRT.


20 posted on 03/23/2022 10:43:13 AM PDT by NetAddicted ( Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson