Skip to comments.
Case CLOSED: Attorney Harmeet K Dhillon looks at KBJ's refusal to define a woman from a LEGAL perspective in d*mning thread
Twitchy.com ^
| 3/23/2022
| Sam J.
Posted on 03/23/2022 10:22:20 AM PDT by NetAddicted
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Sometimes I can copy the tweets that are displayed amongst Twitchy's commentary, but it's easier and clearer to read article at Twitchy.
To: NetAddicted
2
posted on
03/23/2022 10:23:06 AM PDT
by
devane617
(RUN FOR LOCAL ELECTED OFFICE! COUNCIL,SCHOOL BOARD, ETC.)
To: NetAddicted
There should be universal outrage that an individual attempting to get approved for the Supreme Court refuses to define what a "woman" is.
We are not a serious country anymore.
3
posted on
03/23/2022 10:26:21 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(Republicans are all honorable men.)
To: NetAddicted
I heard she’ll probably get confirmed even if no R’s vote for her. All she needs is a simple majority vote now due to a 2017 rule change.
4
posted on
03/23/2022 10:26:50 AM PDT
by
gattaca
("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
To: NetAddicted
Won’t stop the Assistant Democrats from voting to confirm.
And apparently there isn’t much Assistant Democrats can do that will stop people from re-electing them.
Amnesty is a death sentence for the rule of law and this country and yet Flimsey Grahamnesty and Micro Rubio still have lots of people voting for them.
Trump endorsing them is antithetical to MAGA.
5
posted on
03/23/2022 10:28:02 AM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
To: NetAddicted
… as we now know, biology has nothing to do with being a "woman,"This has bad ramifications for Y chromosomes!
6
posted on
03/23/2022 10:29:47 AM PDT
by
immadashell
(New Planned Parenthood slogan: Black Babies’ Lives Don't Matter!c)
To: NetAddicted
Linda Grahamnesty went after her, on her radical p0rn background, today, too.
Now....if Midge will only give the Rs permission to vote AGAINST this far left, sicko, radical.
Hopefully, there is NOW enough push back. We’ll see.
7
posted on
03/23/2022 10:31:11 AM PDT
by
Jane Long
(What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
To: NetAddicted
Simple answer is any human being with XX pair chromosomes is a woman and those with XY chromosome pairs is a male. Intent or desire to work around that reality is a mental state of gender psychosis. If that’s one’s adult choice, have at it. I want my Zebra to have polka-dots.
8
posted on
03/23/2022 10:31:17 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(Today's "disinformation" most often turns out to be tomorrow's facts. )
To: NetAddicted
Yep, refusal to answer makes her look as dumb as she is.
9
posted on
03/23/2022 10:32:06 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: NetAddicted
When this woke nominee refused to define "woman", saying she's not a biologist, I would have followed with:
"So, you will recuse yourself from any cases involving biology?"
"You will recuse yourself from any cases involving "gender equity" or "when does life begin?" because you're not a biologist?"
10
posted on
03/23/2022 10:32:22 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Tolerance will rise until intelligent people are banned from thinking to avoid offending imbeciles)
To: NetAddicted
If she had just said, when asked to define a woman “Lindsay graham” she might be a shoe in lol
11
posted on
03/23/2022 10:33:08 AM PDT
by
Bob434
To: NetAddicted
Any senator who votes for Jackson to become a SCOTUS justice has given aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States. The Constitution has a word for that.
12
posted on
03/23/2022 10:33:19 AM PDT
by
Carl Vehse
(A proud member of the LGBFJB community)
To: Antoninus
There should be universal outrage that an individual attempting to get approved for the Supreme Court refuses to define what a "woman" is. Its a logical consequence of decades of neo-marxist ideologues and central-planners in Washington DC attempting to redefine and re-write individual rights expressed in the Constitution, in as collective, political, group-based rights.
13
posted on
03/23/2022 10:33:46 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: G Larry
Ans also,ask,that she answer whether she is a woman or not, and if so, demand that she answer what makes her a woman.
14
posted on
03/23/2022 10:34:10 AM PDT
by
Bob434
To: NetAddicted
I would have followed up with, If you were to take vitamins, would you take women’s vitamins or men’s vitamins and how would you know?
15
posted on
03/23/2022 10:36:33 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Carl Vehse
The Constitution has three words that say Obama could not be President. (or Harris VP)
It’s now a relic in a glass case.
16
posted on
03/23/2022 10:37:07 AM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
To: NetAddicted
How hard is it to simply state
"A Woman is a human that has two X chromosomes in their cells"?
To: NetAddicted
Of course she has opinions on these issues, they will be plainly known after she’s on the court.
18
posted on
03/23/2022 10:39:17 AM PDT
by
bigbob
To: Lurkinanloomin
2008 wants its debate back. I noticed you didn’t mention songbird McCain who some claim was NBC because he was born in Panamá
19
posted on
03/23/2022 10:42:32 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(“We Did It Joe!” -The Taliban / “Thanks Joe!” -Putin )
To: 1Old Pro
She didn’t sound dumb, but Dhillon is correct: she is political. Maybe activist? She’s also a liar, about CRT.
20
posted on
03/23/2022 10:43:13 AM PDT
by
NetAddicted
( Just looking)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson