Posted on 03/17/2022 7:02:16 AM PDT by RandFan
@RandPaul
This morning I joined @Foxnews
Anytime the left pushes for ‘clean energy,’ realize it's code for limiting energy from fossil fuels and nuclear.
Segment...
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Bingo. Putin paid off the Bidens, then got him boxed by seeing his debt to the far left and leveraging Oil vs ideology to harm America more than through a military assault.
Watch China sitting in the wings after they did the Covid attack.
Putin sees himself as the grandmaster of China/Iran/Russia alliance then setting up the others to fall as he feels he is doing with the US
Ukraine is his “ petri dish” to test world readiness.....
Europeans put themselves under Vlad’s thumb
Ping
The “Greens” are like watermelons, green on the outside but RED on the inside.
From 2019:
https://www.tfp.org/green-is-the-new-red-the-metamorphosis-of-communism/
From 2018:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-sixteen-the-communism-behind-environmentalism-part-i_2781173.html
From 2016:
https://thenewamerican.com/new-film-exposes-communist-roots-of-sustainability-agenda/
From 2009:
https://www.ihatethemedia.com/green-party-wants-communist-van-jones-to-run-for-president
"Eco-socialism" goes back to Karl Marx and William Morris. English novelist and poet William Morris developed the key principles of what was later called eco-socialism and promoted them within the Social Democratic Federation and the Socialist League in the 1880s and 1890s.
That’s why they have to attack CO2, even though no one can prove that it’s a legitimate significant greenhouse gas, and there has been no un-natural warming, ever. CO2 is the primary by product when utilizing hydrocarbons and hydrocarbons are cheap renewable resources, and the human hating leftists can’t stand people living and being free without being subject to oppression! Fossil fuels are the result of life being on earth. If life never existed, there would not be any fossil fuel deposits, nor would there be any need to use them. It’s not a paradox if you understand that these people hate life and have nothing but contempt for everyone.
The Marxists of the last century have done nothing but laid waste to the environment. They are not good stewards, and the leftists in our country say nothing about how China now pollutes, or the ways of the old Soviet Union. This isn’t about stopping the exploitation of mother earth at all. This is about gathering the power to exploit the world into the hands of a few select, and taking the power and freedom of the means and ends of production away from the little guy. It’s about the systematic oppression of the human race.
It’s absolutely legitimate to point at the extremist environmental groups for the reason behind this war - which could get out-of-hand very quickly. They’ve empowered and enriched despotic regimes that provide energy. Getting energy from the Middle East dictators and Russia was never a good idea. Their inability to ‘unplug’ their dependence is going to be fatal.
It’s odd how nuclear is included in the “bad source” category. Constant output with zero CO2 emissions.
- - - - - - -
You forgot to include in your post that CO2 is healthy.
Nail on the head!
Rand senses the danger of being associated with Putinist Russia. He’s been quite hawkish on Russia lately. Conservatives would be wise to take heed here.
I know it’s plant food and not “pollution”.
I was just stating from their POV.
It’s probably good for humans. People living at higher altitude are less likely to have cancer.
It could could just be a correlative property.
Less cities up high, and the body works harder at altitude?...
Either way that would be an interesting study.
And the environazis are orgasmic over this and they plan on doubling down... $10/gallon gas would be their nirvana.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4047450/posts
It would be interesting. I would lean toward higher cosmic and UV radiation at higher altitudes though; the hormetic effect.
he is correct.
Throw an abstract together, see if we can get two decades of funding, and the three of us are set.
:)
Now I’m actually going to see if there’s anything legitimate on the subject.
I think Rand is the only Republican willing to speak up on the GOP side.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.