Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Homer_J_Simpson; rustbucket; DiogenesLamp; x; jeffersondem; jmacusa; rockrr
I am sometimes accused of historical revisionism, and yet in "today's" NY Times I find my opinions expressed exactly.
They bear repeating:

"Editorial: The Recent Message of the President – 4"

Well said, imho... so, Civil War was something to do with slavery after all!

"ebullition of passion"??

4 posted on 03/08/2022 7:49:25 AM PST by BroJoeK (future DDG 134 -- we remember)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK
It is almost inevitable that the lowest civilization in society should exert a paramount influence on Government, as the efforts of men seeking to gain or retain place and power are nearly always in ratio to their lack of self-respect.

That sentence is worth pondering. I suspect it embodies a fundamental truth about the human condition.

5 posted on 03/08/2022 8:13:31 AM PST by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation gets the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK

Hello Bro Joe K. Long time no see.

Certainly the war was about slavery and that means money.

In 1860 four million slaves gave the South a net worth of $3 billion dollars.

More than had been invested in rail roads and factories at the time.

Interestingly I recently read the story of a mortician, Rufus Weaver who had been contracted by the families and the Confederacy to exhume and return the remains of Confederate soldiers killed at Gettysburg.

He exhumed dozens and dozens of bodies, a grim task to be sure and he never got paid.

He calculated at the time he was owed $6,000 dollars.

Money in live people, not dead ones obviously.

Confederate chislers.


6 posted on 03/08/2022 8:52:21 AM PST by jmacusa (America. Founded by geniuses. Now governed by idiots. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK

I don’t think anybody’s trying to say that The Civil War had nothing to do with slavery, of course it did.

But it was more about money and preventing the southern states from leaving.

The reason they were leaving is because the northern states tried to tell them what they could do. Yes regarding slavery.


26 posted on 03/14/2022 9:15:18 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson