Posted on 03/05/2022 12:20:45 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski
Contrary to the CDC's claim that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines do not "change or interact with your DNA in any way," a new Swedish study finds Pfizer's shot goes into liver cells and converts to DNA.
It's the first time that researchers have shown in vitro – or inside a petri dish – how an mRNA vaccine is converted into DNA on a human liver cell line, the Epoch Times reported.
It's precisely what health experts and fact-checkers said for more than a year could not occur.
Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist and epidemiologist who is one of the leading critics of the COVID vaccines, said the findings have "enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change" that could drive a "whole new genre of chronic disease."
The CDC assures Americans that the mRNA and the spike protein it produces in COVID-19 vaccines to create an immune response "don't last long in the body." On its website, the agency states: "Our cells break down mRNA and get rid of it within a few days after vaccination. Scientists estimate that the spike protein, like other proteins our bodies create, may stay in the body up to a few weeks."
Further, the CDC says on a web page titled "Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines" that the "genetic material delivered by mRNA vaccines never enters the nucleus of your cells..."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
The notion that ANYTHING can be converted into DNA is ludicrous.
DNA can be jiggered; but NOTHING can be converted into DNA. The idea is as stupid as medieval alchemy.
The body creates DNA from nucleic acids (two wrapped polynucleotide chains). No reason single polynucleotide chains formed from the same nucleic acids can’t be modified into DNA.
Its reverse-transcribed into the dna.
Converted isnt the correct term, but the fact its being incorporated into the cells is the big deal.
And I think you are completely aware of that fact and are deflecting off it by pointing out the wording they used to describe what is happening, wasn’t accurate.
Gonna need a booster. Maybe eight.
4 March: Rumble: 22m57s: Stew Peters: Top Secret Pfizer Documents Leaked: Pfizer Knew That Vaxx Would Kill Thousands
Friday on the Stew Peters Show, Dr. Robert Malone exposes confidential information from Pfizer containing fatal vaccine injuries and lists of extreme adverse events...
https://rumble.com/vwglmp-top-secret-pfizer-documents-leaked-pfizer-knew-that-vaxx-would-kill-thousan.html
4 March: Rumble: 22m57s: Stew Peters: Top Secret Pfizer Documents Leaked: Pfizer Knew That Vaxx Would Kill Thousands
Friday on the Stew Peters Show, Dr. Robert Malone exposes confidential information from Pfizer containing fatal vaccine injuries and lists of extreme adverse events...
https://rumble.com/vwglmp-top-secret-pfizer-documents-leaked-pfizer-knew-that-vaxx-would-kill-thousan.html
apologies for double post.
Let’s put it this way, the, eh?
Turns out there’s a very good reason genotoxicity studies weren’t done on the mRNA CoupFlu vaxxes.
And it wasn’t because there was zero risk of the material entering the genome.
Amen. And if people read the Swedish article it actually does not demonstrate conversion into DNA in vivo….rather in vitro with conditions that simply do not exist with conditions that do not exist within humans cells and the study shows that ir is not actually integrated into DNA
We’re this to occur it would be readily evident already and it is simply not present. Further, remember much to the chagrin of many, McCullough has repeatedly represented he is on faculty at numerous schools long after he was either thrown off faculty or resigned because of his general dishonesty. While I am aware that he is the high priest is the church of the anti-vaccine his integrity is seriously breached by how he represents himself.
In vitro is not the same as looking at the liver of someone who has died
Show it in autopsy results
Thank you
That may or may not be true. But much of what they present as fact and proof of safety is also based on ‘in vitro’. Much of what they want you to believe about Covid and base their guidance is also based on ‘in vitro’, projection and speculation- very little on true real life clean long term studies. So it goes both ways and intelligent people make best choices they can and don’t just do something because government tells them to. Unfortunately we all have to weed through a lot of crap and draw our own conclusions either way.
Thanks so much.
You’re welcome. One bad myth doesn’t deserve another.
This is a study with in vitro no in vivo cells. Doubt it means anything but certainly all data is important.
Patients are tiring of the medical community’s mutual professional ass-kissing and are more open to alternative sources of information. Covid smoked out many compromised money grubbers and globalist apparatchiks hiding behind well polished résumés and plaques.
McCullough is the least of our Doctor worries and the furthest thing from a “high priest”. If anything he is “apostate Luther”, and your community’s Holy See is having nothing of it!
Gonna need a booster to counter side effects of the original jab
Trust us! we know what we are doing
Thank goodness.
So really...all I have to worry about are the 1291 ADVERSE REACTIONS...as described BY PFIZER in their March 2nd release of vaccine information.
It’s interesting to watch the usual suspects. A year ago, anybody making this claim was a slack-jawed retard, and not even worthy of addressing.
Now, the Squealers have to come out to carefully negotiate the language to convince us that it’s not happening.
Dollars to donuts, in a year from now, we’ll find that this is true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.