Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Confidential Pfizer Documents state ‘Covid-19 Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease is a real possibility’; & now real-world data proves it’s already occurring
dailyexpose.uk ^ | THE EXPOSÉ | THE EXPOSÉ

Posted on 03/04/2022 11:33:29 AM PST by ransomnote

ransomnote: The Expose is over the target and taking flak, banned and censored - even Paypal turned against them in an effort to deprive them of funding. Please pray that the Expose receive the funds it needs to keep serving the public.

Pfizer, the company hit with the largest healthcare fraud settlement and criminal fine to date in 2009; which also happens to be the same company behind the first every mRNA gene therapy injection administered to the general public under emergency use authorisation in the name of Covid-19, has admitted in confidential documents, that it desperately tried to keep from going public, that its Covid-19 mRNA gene therapy may cause Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease.



Since the year 2000, Pfizer have been hit with fines to the amount of at least £7.5 billion, including a single £331.5 million fine for kickbacks and bribery offences, £1.1 billion in fines for false claims offences, and a record breaking individual £1.7 billion fine in 2009 for engaging in fraud by mispromoting a now withdrawn painkiller.


Source

But despite all this the company was still trusted enough by medicine regulators around the world to be granted emerged use authorisation for its experimental Covid-19 injection. Perhaps the company may be incurring some more large fines for kickbacks and bribery offences in the near future?

But we doubt they’ll care much when they made approximately $36 billion dollars in 2021 thanks to Governments worldwide using the hardworking tax payers money to purchase enough doses of their Covid-19 “vaccine” to vaccinate every citizen seven times.

Now, according to confidential documents authored by Pfizer that it wanted to deperately keep secret, the company hasn’t just caused damage to the public purse, it appears it has also caused damage to the publics health, because Pfizer admit that Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease is a a very real theoretical risk for its Covid-19 vaccine.

The confidential document titled ‘5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT
REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021
‘, was submitted by Pfizer-BioNTech as part of its Biological License Application (BLA) to the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA)

Table 5, found on page 11 of the document shows an ‘Important Potential Risk’, and that risk is listed as ‘Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Reporatory Disease (VAERD)’.


Source – Page 11

 

Pfizer writes in the description section that –

‘an expected rate of VAED is difficult to establish so a meaningful observed / expected analysis cannot be conducted at this point based on available data. The feasibility of conducting such an analysis will be re-evaluated on an ongoing basis as data on the virus grows and the vaccine safety data continues to accrue’.

Considering the fact this document was approved on 30th April 2021, and based on data on adverse reactions received up to 28th Feb 2021, this sentence should concern even the most loyal pharmaceutical worshippers.

In the UK the Pfizer jab was granted emergency use authorisation on the 8th Dec 20, and the first injection was administered the following day. By April 2021, 5 months later, Pfizer was admitting that it did not have a clue if its Covid-19 injections caused VAED, and that they will only know once they have more data.

This confirms in black and white that the general public have been taking part in possibly the largest experiment ever conducted, and it’s an expirement that has made a select few extremely rich.

Pfizer continues in the description section to state –

‘Since the first temporary authorization for emergency supply under Regulation 174 in the UK (01 December 2020) and through 28 February 2021, 138 cases [0.33% of the total PM dataset], reporting 317 potentially relevant events were retrieved.’

What Pfizer is admitting here is that up to 28th Feb 21, 138 people had reported adverse events that were markers of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease.

These markers were limited to –

  • Standard Decreased Therapeutic Response Search AND PTs Dyspnoea;
  • Tachypnoea;
  • Hypoxia;
  • COVID 19 pneumonia;
  • Respiratory Failure;
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome;
  • Cardiac Failure;
  • Cardiogenic shock;
  • Acute myocardial infarction; Arrhythmia; Myocarditis;
  • Vomiting; Diarrhoea; Abdominal pain;
  • Jaundice;
  • Acute hepatic failure;
  • Deep vein thrombosis; Pulmonary embolism;
  • Peripheral Ischaemia;
  • Vasculitis;
  • Shock;
  • Acute kidney injury; Renal failure;
  • Altered state of consciousness;
  • Seizure;
  • Encephalopathy;
  • Meningitis;
  • Cerebrovascular accident;
  • Thrombocytopenia;
  • Disseminated intravascular coagulation;
  • Chillblains;
  • Erythema multiforme;
  • Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

According to Pfizer those 138 cases reporting 317 VAED relevant events included –

Of the 138 cases, 71 were deemed ‘medically significant’ of which 8 were left with serious disabilities Non-fatal / non-life threatening hospitalisation was required for 16 cases of which 1 was left with serious disabilities. 17 cases were deemed life threatening of which 7 were deemed serious for hospitalisation, and 38 cases resulted in death.

At the time of the report which was based on data submitted up to the end of February 2021, apart from the 38 cases that were known to have resulted in death at the time, just a further 26 cases were listed as resolved, with 65 not resolved, 1 not resolved with sequelae, and 8 with unknown outcomes.

Pfizer go on to state in the confidential document that –


‘Of the 317 relevant events, the most frequently reported PTs (≥2%) were: Drug ineffective (135), Dyspnoea (53), Diarrhoea (30), COVID-19 pneumonia (23), Vomiting (20), Respiratory failure (8), and Seizure (7).’

Pfizer concludes in its document that –

‘VAED may present as severe or unusual clinical manifestations of COVID-19. Overall, there were 37 subjects with suspected COVID-19 and 101 subjects with confirmed COVID-19 following one or both doses of the vaccine; 75 of the 101 cases were severe, resulting in hospitalisation, disability, life-threatening consequences or death.’

This seems to be an admittance from Pfizer that its vaccine isn’t very good at protecting recipients of its experimental It’s important to remember that these injections do not prevent infection or transmission, they are only supposed to protect against hospitalisation and death. Therefore, with 75 of the 101 confirmed Covid-19 cases being severe (69%), this seems to be an admittance from Pfizer that its vaccine isn’t very good at actually doing that.

Pfizer finishes by stating that –

‘In this review of subjects with COVID-19 following vaccination, based on the current evidence,
VAED/VAERD remains a theoretical risk for the vaccine. Surveillance will continue.’

Here we have Pfizer admitting that Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease is a theoretical risk associated with its experimental Covid-19 gene therapy, which has been injected into the arms of hundreds of millions of people around the world several times since December 2020.

There are no appropriate words that could possibly convey how unbelievably stupid and dangerous the decision to give this injection to millions of people, including children was and still is.

The problem Pfizer now has, is that real-world data from various Public Health institutions around the world shows that the risk of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease is no longer theoretical, it’s been occurring en masse since at least December 2021.

One example of this is data published by Public Health Scotland which shows that the fully vaccinated are up to 4 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated, suggesting Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease is to blame.

The following graph shows the age standardised Covid-19 death rates per 100,000 individuals by vaccination status in Scotland. The data has been extracted from table 15, found on page 50 of the PHS Covid-19 Statistical report published Wednesday 26th Jan 22.


Source Data – Full Report – Page 50

The highest death-rate in the past month among the fully vaccinated was recorded as 14.05 per 100,000 individuals in the week beginning 8th Jan 22.

But at the same time the rate per 100,000 unvaccinated individuals was recorded as being 10.4. Meaning during this week the fully vaccinated were statistically 1.4 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.

However, the most concerning figures came in the week beginning 18th Dec 21. During these seven days the death-rate per 100,000 was recorded as 6.55 in the fully vaccinated, but just 1.69 in the unvaccinated. Therefore, during this week the fully vaccinated were statistically 4 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the not-vaccinated.

The 4 week average age-standardised death rates per 100,000 individuals equates to 6.2 among the not-vaccinated, but 10 among the fully vaccinated, meaning on average the fully vaccinated have been 1.6 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the not-vaccinated between 18th Dec 21 and 14th Jan 22.

If Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease leading to antibody-dependent enhancement is not to blame for these figures then can somebody please explain what is?



TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous; Science
KEYWORDS: bidenvoters; clotshot; covid19jabtruth; deathjab; faketrash; garbagesource; pfizer; ransomnut; thedailyexcrement; vaccine; vaccines

1 posted on 03/04/2022 11:33:29 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt; datura; Fractal Trader; bagster; grey_whiskers; metmom; Jane Long; tatown; ...

PING


2 posted on 03/04/2022 11:33:56 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

My wife had the Pfizer shot a couple of months ago. She is having bad headaches. Are any of those ailments listed contributors to bad headaches?


3 posted on 03/04/2022 11:35:37 AM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Once again the Conspiracy Theories prove to just be Spoiler Alerts.


4 posted on 03/04/2022 11:36:34 AM PST by Little Ray (Civilization runs on a narrow margin. What sustains it is not magic, but hard work. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Weird how that image was cropped.... wonder what was cropped out (and why)? OH! The details show how rare these events are and that nothing currently indicates VAED/VAERD is anything but a theoretical risk.

Quote:

No post-authorized AE reports have been identified as cases of VAED/VAERD, therefore, there is no
observed data at this time. An expected rate of VAED is difficult to establish so a meaningful
observed/expected analysis cannot be conducted at this point based on available data. The feasibility of
conducting such an analysis will be re-evaluated on an ongoing basis as data on the virus grows and the
vaccine safety data continues to accrue.
The search criteria utilised to identify potential cases of VAED for this report includes PTs indicating a
lack of effect of the vaccine and PTs potentially indicative of severe or atypical COVID-19a
.
Since the first temporary authorization for emergency supply under Regulation 174 in the UK (01
December 2020) and through 28 February 2021, 138 cases [0.33% of the total PM dataset], reporting 317
potentially relevant events were retrieved:
Country of incidence: UK (71), US (25), Germany (14), France, Italy, Mexico, Spain, (4 each), Denmark
(3); the remaining 9 cases originated from 9 different countries;
Cases Seriousness: 138;
Seriousness criteria for the total 138 cases: Medically significant (71, of which 8 also serious for
disability), Hospitalization required (non-fatal/non-life threatening) (16, of which 1 also serious for
disability), Life threatening (13, of which 7 were also serious for hospitalization), Death (38).
Gender: Females (73), Males (57), Unknown (8);
Age (n=132) ranged from 21 to 100 years (mean = 57.2 years, median = 59.5);
Case outcome: fatal (38), resolved/resolving (26), not resolved (65), resolved with sequelae (1), unknown
(8);
Of the 317 relevant events, the most frequently reported PTs (≥2%) were: Drug ineffective (135),
Dyspnoea (53), Diarrhoea (30), COVID-19 pneumonia (23), Vomiting (20), Respiratory failure (8), and
Seizure (7).
Conclusion: VAED may present as severe or unusual clinical manifestations of COVID-19. Overall, there
were 37 subjects with suspected COVID-19 and 101 subjects with confirmed COVID-19 following one
or both doses of the vaccine; 75 of the 101 cases were severe, resulting in hospitalisation, disability,
life-threatening consequences or death. None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as
VAED/VAERD.
In this review of subjects with COVID-19 following vaccination, based on the current evidence,
VAED/VAERD remains a theoretical risk for the vaccine. Surveillance will continue.


5 posted on 03/04/2022 11:40:18 AM PST by bhl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

There’s not much the anti-vax side has claimed has not been validated as true.


6 posted on 03/04/2022 11:43:12 AM PST by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Regarding the chart, what does “age-standardized” mean? I assume it means that age has somehow been accounted for, but how?


7 posted on 03/04/2022 11:44:20 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

My ex had the worst migraine of her life after her second Pfizer shot.


8 posted on 03/04/2022 11:48:38 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Well, well, well.

I’ve been seeing vaxxed relatives, one after another, now having strange health-related issues.


9 posted on 03/04/2022 12:04:01 PM PST by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bhl

The highest death-rate in the past month among the fully vaccinated was recorded as 14.05 per 100,000 individuals in the week beginning 8th Jan 22.

But at the same time the rate per 100,000 unvaccinated individuals was recorded as being 10.4. Meaning during this week the fully vaccinated were statistically 1.4 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.


Lie? Or just an inconvenient truth?


10 posted on 03/04/2022 12:13:52 PM PST by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
The table below from the 2/25/2022 release of VAERS data. It's clear that the CDC receives only a small fraction of the actual adverse events experienced by the 'vaccinated', so the numbers below are the 'tip of the iceberg'. For 'headache', some patients find their headache resolves in the first few weeks.

https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/

11 posted on 03/04/2022 12:18:13 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

This is going to be a major ongoing story—and some folks are going to keep getting boosters until they hit the side-effect “jackpot”.


12 posted on 03/04/2022 12:20:49 PM PST by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

i think the latest plan to keep pfizer profits up is annual boosters. Mandated by lots of companies and schools and military etc..


13 posted on 03/04/2022 12:53:10 PM PST by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
This is going to be a major ongoing story—and some folks are going to keep getting boosters until they hit the side-effect “jackpot”.

But for true vax believers, they will deny it's vax related as they are dying from it.

14 posted on 03/04/2022 2:11:34 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I posted such about ADE “Antibody Dependent Enhancement” over a year ago. I was correct. Those evils at Pfizer knew this long before me. If there is justice that company will be destroyed, and those responsible jailed.


15 posted on 03/04/2022 2:13:42 PM PST by cpdiii (CANE CUTTER-DECKHAND-ROUGHNECK-OILFIELD CONSULTANT-GEOLOGIST-PILOT-PHARMACIST )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

I know that many pilots that I work with have bad headaches all the time, but they won’t admit to it with the their companies, or the military, for fear of losing their ability to fly and earn a living.


16 posted on 03/04/2022 3:17:33 PM PST by ducttape45 (Proverbs 14:34, "Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I hear AIDS sucks. Remember who gave it to you and pay them back!


17 posted on 03/04/2022 4:40:17 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saleman

What specific age group? If that were true for any age range over 50, I’d be surprised. But as you well know, vaccine users are typically higher risk (older/fatter), and non-vaccine users typically are lower risk.

Imagine the average age of vaccinated is x, the average unvaccinated age will be much lower (since they are at lower risk, and often too young to use the vaccines.)

What are the stats for similar age and BMI and co-morbidities? (Example 60-65 in otherwise good heath)


18 posted on 03/04/2022 10:36:24 PM PST by bhl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson