Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ONS refuses to publish data on Child Deaths after previous report showed Covid-19 Vaccinated Children are 5100% more likely to die than Unvaccinated Children
dailyexpose.uk ^ | 3/2/22 | THE EXPOSÉ

Posted on 03/02/2022 9:24:06 AM PST by ransomnote

ransomnote: The Expose is over the target and taking flak, banned and censored - even Paypal turned against them in an effort to deprive them of funding. Please pray that the Expose receive the funds it needs to keep serving the public.

A report published by the Office for National Statistics on 20th Dec 21, on deaths by vaccination status in England inadvertently revealed that Covid-19 vaccinated children are up to 52 times more likely to die of any cause than unvaccinated children.

But the latest update from the ONS published 4th Feb 22, has failed to include any data on deaths among children whatsoever, suggesting authorities in the UK clearly have something to hide when it comes to the safety of children being given the Covid-19 vaccine.

 

The latest dataset on ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status in England‘, was published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on the 4th Feb 22, and it contains statistics on deaths between 1st Jan and 31st Dec 21.

The dataset contains various tables showing details such as, ‘Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for deaths involving COVID-19’, and ‘Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for non-COVID-19 deaths’.

But what the latest report has failed to include is any statistics on deaths occurring among children, the question is why?

Children aged 12-15 have been offered the Covid-19 injection since September 21, thanks to the Chief Medical Officer for England, Professor Chris Whitty, overruling the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) and instructing the UK Government to roll-out the experimental injection to kids with immediate effect.

And the previous dataset published by the ONS on 20th Dec 21 containing data on deaths by vaccination status in England between 1st Jan and 31st Oct 21, included plenty of data on children as young as 10.

So why have the ONS not included any data on children in their most recent dataset on deaths by vaccination status in England?

Well it could have something to do with the fact that the previous report showed children are 52 times / 5,100% more likely to die of any cause than children who have not received the experimental injection, but the ONS also tried to hide it back then too.

Back on 20th Dec 21, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published a dataset containing details on ‘deaths by vaccination status in England’ between 1st Jan and 31st Oct 21.

The ONS tabulated their “monthly age-standardised mortality rates by age-group and vaccination status for deaths per 100,000 person-years,” but presented only the data for individuals ages 18 and over.

However, on table 9 of the ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status’ dataset, the ONS inadvertently provided enough details on deaths among children and teenagers by vaccination status for us to calculate the mortality rates ourselves.

All we had to do to work out the mortality-rate per 100,000 person years was divide the person years by 100,000, and then divide the number of deaths by the answer to that equation.

  • Person Years / 100,000 = x
  • Number of Deaths / x = mortality-rate per 100,000 person years

Here are the calculated mortality rates by vaccination status among 15-19-year-olds based on the ONS calculated person-years contained in the previous report published 20th Dec 21 –

The data showed a massive increase in deaths among single-vaccinated and double-vaccinated teens compared to their unvaccinated counterparts. For children aged 15 to 19, the risk of death increased by 82% following the first shot, and a shocking 226% following the second shot.

But here are the calculated mortality rates by vaccination status among 10-14-year-olds based on the ONS calculated person-years contained in the previous report published 20th Dec 21 –

Things between January and October 2021, were much worse for 10 to 14-year-olds. The risk of death increased by a mind-blowing 885% following the first shot, and then an earth shattering 5105% following the second dose.

This meant that children between 10 and 14, who had at least one shot of the Covid-19 vaccine, were 10 times more likely to die between January and October 2021, whilst children who had the second dose were 52 times more likely to die.

But these figures were in fact even worse than they first appeared, because the unvaccinated mortality rate among 10-14-year-olds included children aged 10 and 11 who were not eligible for vaccination at the time. Whereas the vaccinated mortality rates do not include 10 and 11 year olds.

Therefore, if the Covid-19 injections were not causing the untimely deaths of children then we would actually have expected to see a mortality rate that was lower among the vaccinated population than the mortality rate among the unvaccinated population, not a mortality rate that was similar, and certainly not a mortality rate 52 times higher.

Now, we revealed all of this back in January 2022. So if the Office for National Statistics wanted to prove us wrong then they had their chance to do so in their next dataset on ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status in England between 1st Jan and 31st Dec 21‘.

But they published that dataset 4th Feb 22, and instead of providing data on children to quell our fears of the serious consequences of giving children an experimental Covid-19 injection that they do not need, the ONS instead opted to not include any data on deaths among children whatsoever.

We’re now in March, and the ONS have had a month to provide revised data including deaths among children, but they have failed to do so, even though we can see that they revised the data on the 8th Feb 22.

Since the previous report that included data up to 31st October 21, the number of children aged 12-15 receiving a Covid-19 vaccine up to 31st Dec 21, increased from approximately 33% of the population to approximately 50%. So the ONS had plenty more data they could have used in their latest update to prove to the general public that the data actually shows Covid-19 vaccination is a great thing for children.

Instead they have chosen to sweep that data under the carpet, and all we are left with is historical data that shows double vaccinated children are 5,100% more likely to die than unvaccinated children, a statistic that has been reflected in the overall number of deaths per week among 10 to 14 year-olds since the introduction of the Covid-19 vaccine to this age group.

 


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous; Science
KEYWORDS: anthonyfauci; bidenvoters; clotshot; covidstooges; deathjab; obamacare; qtardfantasy; thedailyexcrement; vaccinemandates; vaccines

1 posted on 03/02/2022 9:24:06 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

IMHO children should not be vaccinated and should not be forced to wear a mask.


2 posted on 03/02/2022 9:29:56 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt; datura; Fractal Trader; bagster; grey_whiskers; metmom; Jane Long; tatown; ...

PING


3 posted on 03/02/2022 9:39:03 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

This is criminal level stuff going on with these “vaccines”. And all of our elites who have been pushing it are guilty. Something the antivirus magnate John McAfee once said comes to mind, the next world war won’t be between countries, it will be between the people and their own governments”.


4 posted on 03/02/2022 9:43:26 AM PST by jimwatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Bttt


5 posted on 03/02/2022 9:55:25 AM PST by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

There is no statute of limitations on crimes against humanity. These drug companies CAN be sued, along with the government names supporting them.

Take names


6 posted on 03/02/2022 9:57:22 AM PST by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security in hates:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

The only reason the Expose is catching flak is their publishing misleading information. The fact that paypal has turned against the Expose is telling.

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-vaccines/fact-check-covid-19-vaccines-are-not-increasing-child-mortality-in-england-idUSL1N2UT0RC


7 posted on 03/02/2022 10:04:08 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Reuters. LOL


8 posted on 03/02/2022 10:05:58 AM PST by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

You still turn to the MSM’s fake fact checkers after all we’ve seen them distort about Trump? Oh well, you’ve chosen the side you’re on.


9 posted on 03/02/2022 10:08:07 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Reuters writes on bathroom walls, and rolls its sh*t into little balls.

Those who read what Reuters writ, eat those little balls of sh*t.

10 posted on 03/02/2022 10:11:34 AM PST by Sirius Lee (They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
The fact that paypal has turned against the Expose is telling.

Haha really? And what exactly is it telling you, Bio?

You seriously can't figure this stuff out, can you.


11 posted on 03/02/2022 10:19:04 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee
Haha. Tell 'em, Sirius. : )

#DerpwayDuke

#DugwayDerp

(not sure which one I like better)


12 posted on 03/02/2022 10:21:33 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bagster

agster wrote: “Haha really? And what exactly is it telling you, Bio?”

Paypal refusing to service the Expose tells me that the Expose lacks substance and credibility.


13 posted on 03/02/2022 11:45:21 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Paypal refusing to service the Expose tells me that the Expose lacks substance and credibility.

As usual, you have a hearing problemo due to derpiness.

What it SHOULD be telling you is that Paypal does the bidding of the very people that want to stifle the free flow of information to serve the agenda of the same people you serve.

Now pull your head out and listen again.


14 posted on 03/02/2022 11:58:57 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

bkmk


15 posted on 03/02/2022 1:51:23 PM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

PIng


16 posted on 03/02/2022 8:07:21 PM PST by WhattheDickens? (Funny, I didn’t think this was 1984…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson