Posted on 03/02/2022 4:11:39 AM PST by MtnClimber
If the USA told China that Ukraine joining NATO was a done deal, knowing they would tell Putin, then it was probably Biden’s handlers that provoked the war.
Ukraine is not a member of NATO.
Ukraine was denied entry to NATO in 2008 by Germany and France.
Ukraine is not going to be a member of NATO.
Fake News to justify a Despot’s territorial war of expansion.
NATO expansion toward Russia during their period of weakness after the fall of the USSR acted like a slow-motion Versaille Treaty, spurring Russia to rearm with new generations of weapons, while America and NATO wasted their militaries on useless sandbox wars and ruined them with the woke CRT-globo-homo agenda.
So provocation = justification?
Like buying a new car justifies car-jacking?
Hood Rat morality.
Former Soviet satellite countries don’t need NATO, they could just form their own military pact friendly to NATO and Russia would still be mad.
Khrushchev was in the process of putting his own MRBMs in Cuba after our failed Bay of Pigs invasion. They were not ready to fire, the pads were being built. We nearly went to nuclear war over this. In the end, both sides' missiles were removed from Turkey and Cuba.
For Russia, Ukraine in NATO, with MRBMs a 4 minute flight to Moscow, and tanks a 2 day drive to the Caspian, is a red line just as dire as missiles in Cuba.
This is not a revelation. Russia has been warning the world, and we have been ignoring them.
Turns out, the Russians were serious. Just as JFK was.
Or, Ukrainians kill Russians with western weapons till they leave. Sounds good.
World War One begat World War Two
The Cold War seems to have begat war in Ukraine
Let us pray it does not evolve into World War Three.
Slow motion Versailles, perfectly started.
So Putin is justified in a future invasion of Poland, that was also a "key German invasion route". For the hundredth time, there is NO NATO army in Europe that is a credible invasion force of Russia.
I suggest you read the entire article thoroughly—quite fascinating.
In reality, there was no longer a need for NATO after the USSR fell, and the organization should have disbanded or significantly wound down most of its operations.
The alliance lost it’s purpose and use. Here we are today.
from the wikipedia NATO page itself:
In the 1990s, the organization extended its activities into political and humanitarian situations that had not formerly been NATO concerns
Predicted the Ukraine war THIRTY years ago?
As traders say about buying stocks...
Being early is the same thing as being wrong.
Thanks for the reminder.
The internet is forever.
You equate Ukrainians’ desire for self-determination and defending their country against a foreign invader -to Nazism!
NATO does not invade to expand. Russia does.
“...there was no longer a need for NATO after the USSR fell”
Are you FKN KIDDING ME?
Georgia: Invaded and annexed by Russia 2008.
Crimea: Invaded and annexed by Russia in 2014.
Belarus: Invaded and annexed by Russia in 2020.
Ukraine: Invaded by Russia in 2022.
This is why former Soviet republics want to join NATO.
They are not asking to join Russia. They are being invaded.
Ukraine proves why they need to be in NATO.
In the sense of usage by Bill Clinton, “is” is not the question that is relevant.
Whatever the propaganda media push-out becomes the truth for 24 hours until it is debunked by a fact checker.
You are very naive and silly if you think Russia could look at Ukraine in NATO as anything less than an existential threat, because you believe that NATO represents only rainbows and unicorns.
You are very silly.
But you don't think Russia should feel threatened, because you think NATO only represents lollipops and rainbows.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.