Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All 3 defendants convicted of hate crimes in Arbery killing
Yahoo! ^ | 22/2/22 | Russ Bynum

Posted on 02/22/2022 7:55:48 AM PST by Eleutheria5

Associated Press All 3 defendants convicted of hate crimes in Arbery killing RUSS BYNUM Tue, February 22, 2022, 8:18 AM·5 min read BRUNSWICK, Ga. (AP) — The three men convicted of murder in Ahmaud Arbery’s fatal shooting were found guilty of federal hate crimes Tuesday for violating Arbery’s civil rights and targeting him because he was Black.

The jury reached its decision after several hours of deliberation on the charges against father and son Greg and Travis McMichael and neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan.

During the trial, prosecutors showed roughly two dozen text messages and social media posts in which Travis McMichael and Bryan used racist slurs and made derogatory comments about Black people. The FBI wasn’t able to access Greg McMichael’s phone because it was encrypted.

The McMichaels grabbed guns and jumped in a pickup truck to pursue Arbery after seeing him running in their neighborhood outside the Georgia port city of Brunswick in February 2020. Bryan joined the pursuit in his own pickup and recorded cellphone video of Travis McMichael fatally shooting Arbery. The killing became part of a larger national reckoning on racial injustice after the graphic video leaked online two months later.

Defense attorneys contended the three didn’t chase and kill Arbery because of his race but acted on the earnest, though erroneous, suspicion that Arbery had committed crimes in their neighborhood.

.....

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: anotherdeadthug; arbery; guilty; hatecrime; verdict
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 last
To: ought-six
. That lawsuit DOES allege that all three of the perps were “entrusted by local law enforcement to respond to trespasses in the area.” This lawsuit DOES allege they acted under color of law.

As I said, it's a matter of opinion.

The facts don't really matter. This is a "witch hunt" case, and the mob wanted a scapegoat. The cowardly judiciary and state officials were all too happy to throw people to the wolves in the hopes they don't get eaten instead.

Unfortunately for them, the wolves want more food.

161 posted on 02/23/2022 7:03:48 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

“I don’t think what the Insurance company does or does not do, establishes “color of law”.”

An insurance company has absolutely nothing to do with establishing color of law; it has no say in the matter. Color of law is determined by the facts and the law, neither of which an insurer can do anything about, but accept it.


162 posted on 02/23/2022 7:13:33 AM PST by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
An insurance company has absolutely nothing to do with establishing color of law; it has no say in the matter. Color of law is determined by the facts and the law, neither of which an insurer can do anything about, but accept it.

That is exactly my understanding.

They took a look at this and said "not my problem", and I completely understand that. It really wasn't their problem.

163 posted on 02/23/2022 8:04:42 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I dont care about your considerations. And it wasn’t a suicide.

You are delusional.


164 posted on 02/23/2022 9:39:46 AM PST by JoeRender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: JoeRender
You are delusional.

The only thing delusional about me is my hope that members of a mob can be reasoned with.

I really should stop expecting to trigger rational thinking from people who have been motivated by emotion.

165 posted on 02/23/2022 9:50:27 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I read up on this case, a lot, when if first occurred. I even found a copy of the police report before it was scrubbed from the internet. Our views of what happened are to far apart to even begin debating.


166 posted on 02/23/2022 3:34:18 PM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
I read up on this case, a lot, when if first occurred. I even found a copy of the police report before it was scrubbed from the internet. Our views of what happened are to far apart to even begin debating.

The Truth is objective. We can argue about theories, but facts are immutable.

What is the most compelling piece of evidence you can present that convinces you that you are right in your understanding?

167 posted on 02/23/2022 3:38:27 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

1. The Mcmichaels lied to the police about what they had done. You can take their statement to the police and compare it to the actual map of the neighborhood and the video and easily see they lied.

2. By their own testimony they chased Arbery with their vehicles. They chased him for a mile around the road loop. When Arbery got to the truck, he had a chaser behind him and two armed men in front of him.

3. You need to go read up on the older Mcmichaels, the former LEO. He had his arrest powers removed before he retired because he wouldn’t complete the required training to maintain his certifications.

4. Under the Ctizens Arrest statutes in Georgia, they had to have immediate knowledge of a crime committed by Arbery. They did not. They acted outside the law. They killed someone in the process. They were rightly convicted for it.


168 posted on 02/23/2022 4:11:37 PM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
Well thank you for providing me the items which you believe are compelling in this case. I will see if I can find information on the points you have given me.
169 posted on 02/24/2022 6:51:27 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Blow it out of your ass.


170 posted on 02/24/2022 3:50:52 PM PST by JoeRender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson