[Skwor]

If it is mRNA technology then NO.

If it is an actual vaccine using dead or a weakened strain of the virus or related pathogen, then maybe.

[ransomnote]

An injection of purified, toxic spike proteins is supposed to appeal to ‘religious skeptics’?

[libertylover]

Could a much-delayed COVID-19 shot finally win over religious vaccine skeptics?

Not if their objection is really religious based.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

According to the CDC’s own numbers, the Fauci/China biological warfare virus has a 99.74% survival rate.

https://www.nbc26.com/news/coronavirus/cdc-estimates-covid-19-fatality-rate-including-asymptomatic-cases

75% of the people who died from it had four or more comorbidities.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/cdc-director-admits-over-75-of-covid-deaths-in-people-with-at-least-4-comorbidities

There is no need for the Novavax “vaccine” or any of the other Fauci/China biological warfare virus “vaccines.”

[bk1000]

No.

Full stop.

[frogjerk]

Novavax’s distance from the cell lines might not be enough for some, however. Asked about the Novavax shot, Sarah Quale, president of the anti-abortion Personhood Alliance Education, pointed to a scientific study of Novavax’s vaccine that referred to the use of HEK-293 cells. Pressed about the study, a Novavax spokesperson said the company “did not use HEK-293 cells in the testing of NVX-CoV2373.” “The reference in the Science paper to HEK293 cells was based on well-established scientific knowledge, did not include our vaccine protein, and is completely independent of Novavax COVID-19 vaccine development,” the spokesperson said in a followup email.

Something isn't right here...

[Dr. Sivana]

Three other leading vaccine candidates developed by AstraZeneca with Oxford University, Johnson & Johnson, and Novavax, all have used aborted fetal cell lines both in production and in testing. All three candidates are still in Phase III trials.

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/46806/pro-life-research-group-rates-encouraging-covid-vaccine-development

[xp38]

a year ago maybe....now probably not since covid might be history in a few months

[WoofDog123]

as others have noted, is it mrna tech? does it have graphene products?

even if using traditional vaccine approach, there is a reason we have never had coronavirus vaccines. the virus will mutate around whatever antigens it trains the body to make, and you can end up with ADE or VED down the line.

if you are looking at a dystopian future where the state will require this no matter what, traditional vaccine is a less bad approach just from a safety viewpoint.

but I don’t think the FDA will approve novavax. reason is probably crony capitalism ultimately.

[SaxxonWoods]

It’s not about the brand, it’s about the freedom.

[GonzoII]

I’m fairly sure that the HEK293 cell line was used in testing Novavax.

[Delta 21]

"No human fetal-derived cell lines or tissue, including HEK293 cells, are used in the development, manufacture or production of the Novavax...

Then why was it tested for confirmation "efficiacy" on aborted fetal tissue?

WHY?

[metmom]

No.

[roving]

Used aborted fetal cells. So no

[Political Junkie Too]

Not if it's not a one-and-done true vaccine.

If it requires periodic boosters or annual refreshes, then forget about it.

-PJ

[Trillian]

They should stop pushing vaccines for colds. Especially since the current ones are injuring and killing people at high rates.

[catnipman]

“Could Novavax win over some religious vaccine skeptics?”

only if they want to be injected with pure spike protein plus their double-secret proprietary adjuvant, Matrix-M, which is necessary to hyperstimulate the immune system because their vax is too weak to work without provoking the immune system in general to grossly over-react to foreign invaders with said adjuvant ....

[Chauncey Gardiner]

I’m done with shots

[Sirius Lee]

The only people still pushing these worthless shots are the retards and our resident paid social media “influencer” (same thing).

[dforest]

no