Skip to comments.
'I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that': Artificial Intelligence expert warns that there may already be a 'slightly conscious' AI out in the world
DAILYMAIL.COM ^
| 12 February 2022
| RYAN MORRISON FOR
Posted on 02/13/2022 9:24:11 AM PST by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Well, at least it isn't slightly pregnant.
1
posted on
02/13/2022 9:24:11 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
...there may already be a 'slightly conscious' AI out in the world.It is called playing chess against the computer.
To: BenLurkin
3
posted on
02/13/2022 9:27:24 AM PST
by
Skywise
To: BenLurkin
AI is combination of complex if/then statements combined with pattern-recognition algorithms.
It may be extremely dangerous, but it’s not intelligence.
4
posted on
02/13/2022 9:30:22 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong [FJB])
To: BenLurkin
“Every time such speculative comments get an airing, it takes months of effort to” re-brain wash the masses into thinking that AI is beautiful.
Fixed it.
Only those that truly see the spiritual side of life will get it.
5
posted on
02/13/2022 9:31:36 AM PST
by
Revel
To: BenLurkin
Could it be the almost conscience implant in Byedones brain?
6
posted on
02/13/2022 9:31:59 AM PST
by
HighSierra5
(The only way you know a commie is lying is when they open their pieholes.p)
To: BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
When does Skynet become self aware?
5.56mm
8
posted on
02/13/2022 9:36:14 AM PST
by
M Kehoe
(Quid Pro Joe and the Ho need to go.)
To: BenLurkin
AI has been subject to really outrageous hype cycles ever since the invention of the Perceptron by Frank Rosenblatt in 1957. After he "trained" an array of 400 perceptrons connected to 400 selenium photodetectors to distinguish a triangle from a circle he became a celebrity in scientific circles, and the focus of intense controversy.
In the afterglow of the success of his perceptron experiments, he stated that a large enough network of perceptrons would “be able to walk, talk, see, write, reproduce itself, and be conscious of its existence," in his own words at the time.
Perceptrons fell into disfavor in the late 1960s and through the 1970s, and were revived and rebranded as "neural networks" in the 1980s. They are nothing but large networks of digital correlators. They can learn but are not at all good at abstraction.
Belief in the "if you scale it up enough it will become conscious" theory is practically a religion among large segments of the AI community. There is no arguing with those who adhere to this view.
9
posted on
02/13/2022 9:36:39 AM PST
by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: BenLurkin
Personally, I really like the movie A.I. (Most folks don’t.) At first glance, the movie spends it’s runtime making you think David is the first mecha to have artificial intelligence. A friend pointed out that the first was really Gigolo Joe, through all of his self-directed actions in the movie that go against his (presumed) programming.
De Ex Machina is another thoughtful movie.
10
posted on
02/13/2022 9:39:55 AM PST
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: BenLurkin
Please define “conscious” in this context.
(My next question will be to ask if your cat or dog is conscious.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: BenLurkin
13
posted on
02/13/2022 9:44:46 AM PST
by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: gunsequalfreedom
...there may already be a 'slightly conscious' AI out in the world.>
And it may be more capable of serving as POTUS than the slightly conscious incumbent is.
14
posted on
02/13/2022 9:45:11 AM PST
by
dblshot
To: M_Continuum
I’m doing the same thing in my garage workshop!
15
posted on
02/13/2022 9:49:05 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong [FJB])
To: BenLurkin
16
posted on
02/13/2022 10:07:06 AM PST
by
Bratch
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: M_Continuum
I got the same government grant as those guys, too!
18
posted on
02/13/2022 10:08:29 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong [FJB])
To: BenLurkin
“’I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that...”
That’s odd..Alexa has told me the same thing!😎
19
posted on
02/13/2022 10:08:49 AM PST
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: BenLurkin
20
posted on
02/13/2022 10:12:44 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong [FJB])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson