Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Does the Corporate Media Mean When They Say ‘There’s No Evidence of Voter Fraud?’
American Greatness ^ | 10 Feb, 2022 | David Keltz

Posted on 02/11/2022 4:07:07 AM PST by MtnClimber

When one candidate “wins” three swing states by fewer than 50,000 votes, with serious problems verifying hundreds of thousands of those votes, that is not evidence of a free and fair election.

nyone with half an ounce of integrity knows the manner in which the 2020 election was conducted was neither free nor fair. Never before in our nation’s history did we have a presidential election with so many safety measures that were deliberately ignored or willfully removed. And never have we had an election with so much early voting, and mail-in voting.

All of this was made possible by drastic and unconstitutional rule changes implemented illegally by Democratic secretaries of state at the 11th hour, including the expanded use of mail-in ballots, unsupervised drop boxes, and ballot harvesting.

Yet the propagandists in the corporate media have remained silent about all of it, and have shown zero interest in exploring what may actually have occurred. Donald Trump is out of office. That’s all they care about.

As soon as Joe Biden was declared the winner by the Associated Press, CNN, and other news outlets, we were all told to shut up and accept the results. And even worse, to this day, anyone who questions the legitimacy of the election is considered a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist who wants to overthrow “Our Democracy™.”

But as we continue to learn more about what actually happened, it is becoming evident that the corrupt establishment media is more desperate to ensure that the truth is not revealed under any circumstances.

Here are some facts.

In the last election, 66.7 percent of the eligible voting population supposedly cast a ballot, resulting in the highest voter turnout in 120 years. By contrast, only 59.7 percent of eligible voters cast their ballots in the 2016 election.

(Excerpt) Read more at amgreatness.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS: bias; communism; electionfraud; mediabias; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Sarcazmo
gaslighting

Bingo. Not only to solidify the lie that Trump lost, but to enforce the other lie that Jan 6 was an insurrection, which they hope they can use to prevent him from running again,

Trump needs to fight back harder than he has, starting with building a monument of evidence on his own site, rather than relying in seminars by Mike Lindell.

21 posted on 02/11/2022 5:30:53 AM PST by Golden Eagle (What's in YOUR injection? You really have no way of knowing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Notice how the terminology used by the media and Dems evolved from “no evidence of voter fraud” to “no evidence of WIDESPREAD voter fraud” overnight.


22 posted on 02/11/2022 5:34:18 AM PST by Demiurge2 (Define your terms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Demiurge2
Notice how the terminology used by the media and Dems evolved from “no evidence of voter fraud” to “no evidence of WIDESPREAD voter fraud” overnight.

I am sure that not every vote was fraudulent. So there you go...

23 posted on 02/11/2022 5:38:39 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Demiurge2

Voter fraud
Vote fraud
Voter registration fraud
Voter identification fraud
Vote counting fraud
Ballot fraud
Ballot counting fraud
Election fraud....

It all depends on what the meaning of “is” is.


24 posted on 02/11/2022 5:46:33 AM PST by Roccus (First we beat the Nazis........Then we defeated the Soviets....... Now, we are them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The elections in this country, which are run mainly by democrats, are characterized by two key points. They are the most difficult, by design, to detect fraud. And they are constantly under attack by the democrats, who want to make them less secure.


25 posted on 02/11/2022 5:47:07 AM PST by robel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Technically they are correct, there was no fraud. What happened was ALL the rules that are designed to prevent fraud were illegally suspended by governors using “emergency powers” because of covid.


26 posted on 02/11/2022 5:50:12 AM PST by 100%FEDUP (I'm seeing RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

BINGO! HURRAH! AMEN!

You are correct!!

Virginia DID IT. They acted, they watched, they organized and they scared the HE!! out of the THIEVES.

If every state cares enough to do that, WE WILL SUCCEED.

N.B. Nobody really cared about this for decades...Thank you President Trump.


27 posted on 02/11/2022 5:50:44 AM PST by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Doing a caucus where samples of “voters” are asked if they really voted can give an estimate of the size of the fraud. The MSM will just claim faulty memor, but they will know that people know the truth.


28 posted on 02/11/2022 5:52:10 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo
2020 was certainly stolen and I have seen nothing since that makes me think 2022 will be any different.

And the 2022 steal will be credited to “Democrats being rewarded by voters for ending COVID and taming inflation” - just watch.

29 posted on 02/11/2022 5:52:43 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: robel
Think of it: why would ANY incumbent politician of either party, having just been elected or re-elected, question the legitimacy of the election?

There’ll be no investigations of any substance.

30 posted on 02/11/2022 6:04:52 AM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

What happened was obvious to anybody who is intellectually honest and who bothered to look.

He didn’t even mention that the rejection rate magically dropped to 10% or less of its usual total despite all those new people voting by mail for the very first time.

Nor did he mention how poll watchers were thrown out, sudden “water pipe leaks” in the middle of the night followed by pulling out boxes and boxes full of ballots from underneath the tables and counting them - illegally - after the poll watchers had been shoo-d out of the building.

Nor did he mention the numerous examples of people who were dead having voted, people who were underage having voted, people who voted from PO boxes, people voting from nonexistent addresses, etc etc.


31 posted on 02/11/2022 6:12:58 AM PST by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Why is there almost no news about canvassing in Arizona where the canvassers go to the homes of people shown to vave voted in the 2020 election and the people deny that they voted. The rate of apparent false votes was reported to be about 30%.

For the same reason that pallets of IDENTICAL mail-in ballots were accepted as legitimate and counted in numerous states. I said going in to the 2020 election, "If you want to find the fraud, find out who's been ordering paper and laser toner..."

They get to say "no evidence of fraud" because judges in a bunch of states said those ballots were legit when they clearly weren't.
32 posted on 02/11/2022 6:15:54 AM PST by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

It is more wordsmithing. No evidence of vote fraud does not mean there was no vote fraud. But it sounds like there was no vote fraud. Ever since the Clinton admin wordsmithing has been the only way the democrats will discuss something they could get into trouble for.


33 posted on 02/11/2022 6:25:38 AM PST by BobinIL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

It means there was voter fraud.

“and have shown zero interest in exploring what may actually have occurred. Donald Trump is out of office. That’s all they care about.”

Indeed. One liberal confessed to me while he didn’t believe Biden got elected through voter fraud, if he indeed got into office that way, he was OK with it just as long as it got Trump out of office.


34 posted on 02/11/2022 6:45:05 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“In the last election, 66.7 percent of the eligible voting population supposedly cast a ballot, resulting in the highest voter turnout in 120 years. By contrast, only 59.7 percent of eligible voters cast their ballots in the 2016 election.”

That sounds about right. I used to work the polls on election day. Turnout varied. If it was a mayoral or congressional election, only about 25 percent of registered voters bothered to vote. The presidential elections was our biggest turnout. Only about 50 percent of registered voters bothered to vote.


35 posted on 02/11/2022 6:52:55 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

And according to the records published by the Delaware County office of Elections there were 29K more mail in ballots counted than mail in voters recorded in the SURE system. Frank Ryan uncovered over 400K statewide. nothing done by republicans in the state. Don’t vote for corrupt Corman or Mastriano who voted for Act 77. Corman pretends to audit the election results via Senator Dush. nothing.


36 posted on 02/11/2022 7:00:56 AM PST by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

It means that the Soros funding is coming in, and they control the narrative.


37 posted on 02/11/2022 7:37:28 AM PST by RobertoinAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
What Does the Corporate Media Mean When They Say ‘There’s No Evidence of Voter Fraud?’

We didn't look for voter fraud, and we didn't find any evidence, therefore there was no voter fraud.

38 posted on 02/11/2022 7:40:24 AM PST by nuke_road_warrior (Making the world safe for nuclear power for over 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

1984


39 posted on 02/11/2022 8:03:25 AM PST by Vaduz ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

If it really had been a fair & free election, Democrats would have thrown open the doors to allow scrutiny. The fact that they fought even talking about it, proves that they have something to hide.


40 posted on 02/11/2022 8:24:18 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson