Posted on 02/09/2022 10:36:30 AM PST by Signalman
Israeli scientists said they found "striking" differences in the chances of getting seriously ill from COVID-19 when they compared patients who had sufficient vitamin D levels prior to contracting the disease, with those who didn't.
A study published Thursday in research journal PLOS One found that about half of people who were vitamin D deficient before getting COVID-19 developed severe illness, compared to less than 10 percent of people who had sufficient levels of the vitamin in their blood.
We know vitamin D is vital for bone health, but its role in protecting against severe COVID-19 is less-well established.
The latest research was the first to examine vitamin D levels in individuals prior to them contracting COVID-19, the study authors said.
Dr. Amiel Dror, a study author and physician at the Galilee Medical Center, said of the findings: "We found it remarkable, and striking, to see the difference in the chances of becoming a severe patient when you are lacking in vitamin D compared to when you're not," per the Times of Israel.
The findings come from 253 people admitted to Galilee Medical Center in Nahariya, Israel between 7 April 2020 and 4 February 2021 – a period before the highly-infectious Omicron variant emerged.
Dror said the findings suggested vitamin D helped bolster the immune system to deal with viruses that attack the respiratory system.
"This is equally relevant for Omicron as it was for previous variants," Dror said.
The research doesn't prove vitamin D protects against COVID-19 and isn't a green light to avoid vaccines and take vitamins instead. Vaccines cut the risk of Omicron hospitalization, particularly after a booster, by up to 90 percent, according to the UK Health Security Agency.
Most vitamin D comes from direct sunlight on the skin. It's also found in foods such as fatty fish, mushrooms, and egg yolks as well as supplements.
Vitamin D levels of more than 20 nanograms per milliliter are considered sufficient for most people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – which is the benchmark used by the researchers from Bar-Ilan University and Galilee Medical Center.
Research compiled before the emergence of COVID-19 and published in The Lancet, found vitamin D cut the risk of other respiratory infections, compared with dummy drugs.
But for COVID-19, early findings have been inconsistent – some studies have found a link between low vitamin D levels and severe COVID-19, whilst others concluded the vitamin wasn't protective.
It wasn't clear – even from those studies with results showing a positive correlation between low vitamin D levels and severe COVID-19 – if depleted vitamin D came before or after people got sick, the Israeli researchers said.
Despite the new Israel data, we still don't know if low vitamin D levels cause people with COVID-19 to develop serious disease.
Underlying conditions that reduce vitamin D can also make people more vulnerable to severe COVID-19, for example.
The Israeli researchers cautioned vitamin D was "one piece of the complex puzzle" underlying severe COVID-19, in addition to comorbidities, genetic predisposition, dietary habits, and geographic factors.
"Our study warrants further studies investigating if and when vitamin D supplementation among vitamin D deficient individuals in the community impacts the outcome of an eventual COVID-19 episode," they said.
LOL I take all 3 PLUS K2 MK7, not MK4 which is found to be useless.
This has been known for almost two years now. It’s good to see current statistics, though, that reaffirm what’s been known for so long.
I just had blood drawn for a bunch of routine work. I had my doc put an order in for Vit D. I’m taking 4,000 IU and getting lots of sunshine, so look forward to seeing my level.
About six months ago, I had 43 ng/l taking 5,000. Just had blood drawn today for another test.
“ D3, C, Zinc, and Quercetin” — me, too. Plus NAC and Melatonin. I started Nigella Sativa a couple weeks ago per the FLCCC recommendation that it is a Ivermectin substitute.
Yeah, “Business Insider,” but they are reporting an Israeli university medical school study. Don’t shoot the messenger.
Exactly my regimen. Was sick a little for about two days.
“When I got it I took a D3 every day.”
Unlikely to do anything beneficial. Typical capsule doses need to be taken for months to get the D level high enough to fight off covid. That’s why they say those who had been taking D prior to infection had the better results.
Could be.
We knew this before this study.
It’s not “mysterious”.
It’s been known for ages.
Looks like Deep State is trying another modified limited hangout.
Lots of studies, and the higher the vit D level the more impressive the results. Many people don’t realize how much they need and lots of docs even if they check it only use a low level as a standard.
It's like all of human history, science, and medicine ceased to exist when the "COVID" scamdemic was declared. This is what would have been called "common knowledge" barely two years ago. Today, it's a "shocking" discovery.
28 oz of Nesquick and at least 24 oz of regular milk a day for the past 40 years... I wonder if I qualify?...
Milk has it and if you dont tolerate the vitamin, milk is one way to get it.
That and get out in the sun when its out.
Does Nesquick contain added vitamin a?
Foods have more vitamin a than we need. Excess vitamin a can cause bone problems and makes the body reduce the vitamin d level faster.
just looked... it boasts Vitamin A & D...
Same. Convinced that kept me from going full-blown.
The worst I got this time was nasal....and extreme fatigue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.