Greek Soccer aged 21 dies after suffering cardiac arrest on the pitch at a stadium where there was no defibrillator

Mail Online UK ^ | 02/03/2022 | Charlie Walker

[Jan_Sobieski]

A Greek footballer has died after suffering a cardiac arrest on the pitch during a game where there was no defibrillator or ambulance at the stadium.

The player, aged 21, was playing for a Greek third tier team, Ilioupoli, when tragedy struck five minutes into the game.

Alexandros Lampis collapsed at the First Municipal Stadium during a match on Wednesday.

The stadium is within a south-eastern suburb of the Greek capital Athens, but the ambulance did not arrive for 20 minutes, The Sun reports, and there was no way to resuscitate the stricken player at the ground.

The incident comes after the world watched in horror only eight months ago when Christian Eriksen collapsed suffering from a sudden cardiac arrest, while playing for Denmark at Euro 2020.

In that incident, Denmark’s team doctor, Morten Boesen, confirmed that the 29-year-old had gone into cardiac arrest on the pitch and was brought back through a combination of CPR and an electric shock from a defibrillator.

Eriksen's life was saved and he is now set to make a remarkable return to top-flight football with Brentford.

The Danish midfielder has been allowed to return to professional football after a defibrillator was implanted into his body, which helps to regulate his heart rate...

[semimojo]

So, based on your above criteria, should I assume that after the FDA wanted 75 years to release Pfizer safety data (which a federal judge rejected), and then scrubbed the document explaining the approval of the Moderna drug after questions were raised about references to unpublished safety data, that this negatively affects your opinion of the FDA as a credible source of information?

The FDA is a bureaucracy. They have limited resources and don't want to spend time redacting personal information from the trial data. It isn't like the data isn't going to be released - it is. Monthly.

They claim the Moderna document going missing is a technical problem, and it may have been reposted by now for all I know, but given that it was posted once and the "incriminating" details are all in this article I don't see what would be to gain by hiding it at this point.

I'm not a conspiracy person and I don't think the FDA is engaged in one.

I ask why nobody is organizing a study to gather the evidence.

What makes you think no one's looking at this?

Public health surveillance is constantly being done by the CDC, WHO, and dozens of other organizations like the American Cancer Society and the American Heart Association.

If there was a significant spike in any of these diseases it would show in the data, but it hasn't.

What we have is a few people claiming an increase with no real data behind them while those who actually review the data see nothing unusual.

I'm not the investigator, but that shouldn't keep me (or anyone else, like the authors who compiled sports data) from making an observation and asking for it to be investigated.

It is investigated. Constantly. If the spikes were happening it would show.

Here's just one example.

It started out as a few hospitals noticing an increase in cases, local newspapers picked up the stories (Eight chest pain cases among adolescent boys detected after COVID vaccination in San Diego), and then the usual comments that it was either a normal amount or they had unknown health issues, until finally the CDC took it seriously enough to call an emergency meeting over it, and then studies followed.

Do you really think no one noticed until they started seeing news reports?

the doctor at the school board meeting who asked rhetorically why, after more than eight months, there were no autopsies being done on people who died suddenly within two weeks of receiving the vaccine?

I don't think the doctor really knew what he was talking about. From the paper you cited:

"Although post-mortem investigations were reported in only a few cases, it is reasonable to assume that the potential causality between death and COVID-19 vaccination had been studied in a large number of post-mortem investigations for different reasons that had not been published: the fact that only 17 papers with post-mortem investigations were published does not mean that post-mortem investigations in deaths after vaccination were not performed. This consideration is important in order to clarify the important effort that the scientific community is still making to clarify all aspects related to COVID-19 vaccination."

I think there's more analysis going on than you think.