[Qilin]

> Did I say that? NO. Not only NO but FUQ NO. I really don’t like trolls twisting my words so they can argue against the straw position.

I apologize. It was not my intention to twist your words. Here's what you wrote that led me that that interpretation.

[...]then you’ve made a bit of a case that the man went from criticizing the Electoral College to relying on it in 2016. That reinforces my perspective as a straightforward constitutionalist.

Perhaps, I misunderstood your meaning.

> He gave a rat’s ass in 2016.

He accepted the electoral vote in 2016 because he won. If he hadn't won, he would not have accepted it. Do you seriously doubt this?

> But lookie here, you’re wandering into neverTrumpism land and that level of bullshiite has a tendency to get one zotted.

I'm not terribly worried about that. I'm am ultimately only accountable to God. But I think Jim would do well to keep a few of us around because we're going to be the ones to pick up the pieces after Trump and his followers have burned the house down.

> Gosh, would that qualify as a “constitutional conservative awakening at 68 years of age?”

Gosh, no. That would qualify as Trump doing or saying whatever he thinks is in his own interest without regard for the law, moral principles, etc.

[Kevmo]

He accepted the electoral vote in 2016 because he won. If he hadn’t won, he would not have accepted it. Do you seriously doubt this?
***Did I SAY I seriously doubt this? NO. You are asserting a hypothetical. Do YOU seriously doubt that the election was stolen in 2020? Even after 4 years of a sitting president the deep state and corrupt democraps had enough power to steal it. So instead of hypotheticals, I’m sittin’ on REAL situations.

Kevmo: But lookie here, you’re wandering into neverTrumpism land and that level of bullshiite has a tendency to get one zotted.

Q: I’m not terribly worried about that.
***You should be.

I’m am ultimately only accountable to God.
***I sincerely doubt that. You don’t post like someone who upholds God as your Divine Principle.

But I think Jim would do well to keep a few of us around
***Then you acknowledge you’re a troll who has drifted into NeverTrumpLand.

because we’re going to be the ones to pick up the pieces after Trump and his followers have burned the house down.
***How the hell did we burn the house down? WE WON. In 2016. We also won in 2020 but that frikken election was STOLEN. RINOs lost in 1992, 1996, 2008, 2012 and we lost ground when our elected prez turned RINO in 2006. We are HERE right NOW cleaning up after YOUR mess.

Kevmo: Gosh, would that qualify as a “constitutional conservative awakening at 68 years of age?”

Q: Gosh, no.
***That’s all ya needed to say. Instead, you added more NeverTrumpisms that qualify you for mistreatment.

That would qualify as Trump doing or saying whatever he thinks
***You are simply full of shiite. You have a good ground game because there are facts available to show Trump isn’t much of a constitutionalist but your otherwise assertions make you simply a troll who deserves a zot.

is in his own interest without regard for the law, moral principles, etc.
***Now you’ve drifted past RINO level NeverTrumpLand straight into DU bullshiite. My suggestion is that you follow JimRob’s position to go and start another website like www.trueblueRinos.com or that original www.wideawake.com site which triggered the bugzapper thread.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435/posts
https://freerepublic.com/tag/truebluerino/index
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2902837/posts

It’ll save us time and energy. Thanks in advance.

[grey_whiskers]

Quilin wrote:

" I'm not terribly worried about that. I'm am ultimately only accountable to God. But I think Jim would do well to keep a few of us around because we're going to be the ones to pick up the pieces after Trump and his followers have burned the house down."

Anyone want to notify the boss about a never-Trumper speaking for him?

[vivenne]

After Trump and his followers burn down the house........

Care to elaborate on how this will happen?

[Bikkuri]

"But I think Jim would do well to keep a few of us around because we're going to be the ones to pick up the pieces after Trump and his followers have burned the house down."

I am pretty sure that this statement alone goes against what is stated on the Home Page of FR.






The pic above is posted on the Home Page of FreeRepublic.com. This site is for Conservatives (and I am sure Anti-Trumpers fall out of that category).
If you want to vent, I recommend you go to Daily Mail or DU. You would be at home there.

[Bikkuri]

Finally burned his last straw(man) and left the smell of Ozone behind.

[vigilante2]

See ya iatz