PING
There was never a ‘pandemic of the unvaccinanted’....it was and is a ‘pandemic of the vaccinated’......
Serving up fictional fear porn, you mean.
I'll donate a bag of dog poop to them. Maybe two bags.
Got a mailing address?
Long-term effects will be really interesting.
We were supposed to learn something from Thalidomide and DES. Guess not.
If 90% of population is vaccinated have 80% of deaths then 20% of deaths are from the 10% unvaccinated. So unvaccinated are 2.25 times more likely to die. (.2/.1)/(.8/.9).
It may still be a very small risk.
If Mr. ‘ I am The Science’ Fauci and progressive administrative governments do not agree then this must be fake news. The world needs more people to obey - be like Neil Young and keep in line.
You got to crack a few eggs to test a vaccine and try and get it approved.
Ping
Actually, your colored charts are all from ONE Australian state, NSW. What about data from Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania, and the Northern Territory, as well as the federal district of Canberra?
Those figures look bad. I would assume it’s even worse for the whole country...
Yet does it matter if the government and media hide it as misinformation?
Most likely lying about the other 20% to keep the mandates.
Ok, according to the LANCET:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099%2821%2900768-4/fulltext
“Vaccine effectiveness studies have conclusively demonstrated the benefit of COVID-19 vaccines in reducing individual symptomatic and severe disease, resulting in reduced hospitalisations and intensive care unit admissions.”
What the above Lancet correspondence concedes is vaccination gives no advantage when it comes to protecting against infection and transmission.
Now, we have this Australian study contradicting even the Lancet.
What are we left to believe?