Posted on 01/22/2022 6:57:45 AM PST by Homer_J_Simpson
The link to NY Times archives I used for this post goes to the editorial on page 5. Jan. 22, 1862 is not entered properly in the NYT index, so I couldn’t link to the lead story-HJS.
The loyal sentiment of all the border Southern States will be greatly strengthened by the victory on the Cumberland. Its influence will extend to Tennessee, North Carolina and Eastern Virginia. It may even find a response from Louisiana and her commercial metropolis, whose trade relations with the Upper Valley of the Mississippi were madly and wickedly suspended last Winter to the behests of the Cotton rebellion. The truth is, that Louisiana had as little heart in the first movement of secession as Tennessee or North Carolina. The Northwestern States, now in arms for the Constitution and the Union, as well as Kentucky and Missouri, were tributary to her commerce. For more than fifty years Ohio and Kentucky had been building up New-Orleans, and when the growth of Illinois, Indiana and Missouri, and the immense surplus products which they were enabled to market, were added, the strides of that city to commercial greatness were rapid and in every sense surprising beyond precedent. We do no violence to probability, therefore, in saying that Louisiana must feel that the victory already won, and the battles yet to be fought in the same quarter, are so many blows to unshackle her own trade and prosperity -- to give to New-Orleans the busy life it was wont to enjoy mainly through the custom of the Upper Valley, and to her sugar interest the profitable markets, which, until recently, it almost monopolized.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
First session: November 21, 2015. Last date to add: May 2025.
Reading: Self-assigned. Recommendations made and welcomed.
Posting history, in reverse order
https://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:homerjsimpson/index?tab=articles
To add this class to or drop it from your schedule notify Admissions and Records (Attn: Homer_J_Simpson) by reply or freepmail.
Link to previous New York Times thread
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4031396/posts
The link to NY Times archives I used for this post goes to the editorial on page 5. Jan. 22, 1862 is not entered properly in the NYT index, so I couldn’t link to the lead story-HJS.
Important from Washington: The Finances of the Government – 2-3
The Great Battle in Kentucky: The Report of the Total Rout of the Rebels Fully Confirmed – 3-4
Important from New-Mexico: Retreat of the Texan Rebels without Attacking Fort Scott – 4
Important from Fortress Monroe: Rebel Rumors About the Burnside Expedition – 4-5
Editorial: The Victory-Its Effect in Tennessee – 5-6
The Commander in Kentucky – 6
Americanization of Foreigners By the War – 6
Deputations to Washington* – 6
Brilliant Attempt on American Credulity – 6
The Third Battalion Gov. Sprague Cavalry – 6
*Mr. Ruggles named
Bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.