Posted on 01/21/2022 1:28:57 PM PST by true believer forever
"A mother named Violet with a 16-year-old boy who has autism begged the schools to let her son have an exemption.
They refused. When forced to wear the masks he became distraught and he harmed himself so badly that he had to be hospitalized in a mental institution.
Violet obtained the bond for the superintendent of her school district. Turns out – The superintendent was carrying a $4 million liability per bond claim!!
So next Violet served the superintendent with a letter of intent to file a claim against her bond if she didn’t pull back the mask mandates, admit she was wrong, and resign within five days. The superintendent did nothing.
After day 6 Violet filed the claim against her at the bond company.
The very next day we have a recording from the lawyers who represent the district explaining that they have to get rid of the masks, all state and federal funding is BLOCKED, and the superintendent is on her own with regard to the $4 million claim!!!
They also put out a request for parent volunteers to substitute for teachers because their funding is CEASED due to an OPEN claim against them."
I understood it as their was a voice mail with all the statements above, more of a threat, which led the school district to rescind the mask mandate and replace it with a recommendation. Even if that is all that happened, the change from mandate to recommendation is a good outcome, especially for the mother involved.
I am not sure that this is a tried and true tactic, but if it is, Loudon is in big trouble.
After watching the video and the website Bondsforthewin.com, it almost looks like this could be used against many govt folks not following the law or causing harm through neglect or their own willful actions such as the Soros DA’s and mayors.
The correct link for this story is: https://bondsforthewin.com/2022/01/19/elementor-2353/
A surety bond is defined as a three-party agreement that legally binds together a principal who needs the bond, an obligee who requires the bond and a surety company that sells the bond. The bond guarantees the principal will act in accordance with certain laws. If the principal fails to perform in this manner, the bond will cover resulting damages or losses.
https://www.suretybonds.com/surety-bond-definition.html
Thanks for the info. I searched it out on the net but still not quite clear on it, though this helps.
And the insurance companies shall lead them....
If this is a truly implementable strategy, that is the beauty of it - the insurance bond companies will fight wildly to meet the demands of the claim ...
This is the correct link, sorry. Also info in the video.
https://bondsforthewin.com/2022/01/19/elementor-2353/
The only way to obtain payment from an insurance company like that is with a judgement from a court.
There was no payment made. The district changed their mandate to a highly recommended status. They blinked.
Apparently, the insurer followed with threats to the district, which then changed its mandate to a recommended status. Which is really all the mother wanted.
“I searched it out on the net but still not quite clear on it, though this helps.”
I, also, am not clear on the ramifications, but it is an interesting legal line of attack against leftist bureaucrats.
Where I live, my constitutional sheriff sends his investigators into the bureaucratic morass, arrests them and ultimately sends them to state prison. So far, three are serving time in state prison and two more have fled the state.
I agree. I posted this because it seems like a really powerful strategy, but an experienced lawyer needs to weigh in on it. And if it is, AWESOME!
I’ve done similar strategic moves in the past. However, I had the experience as a CPA doing compliance audits on Federal Grants so I knew their weak points.
Would you consider getting involved in vetting this practice and maybe getting involved in helping out. Because if it is a good tactic, I think it is an excellent one.
no
Where I live, my constitutional sheriff sends his investigators into the bureaucratic morass, arrests them and ultimately sends them to state prison. So far, three are serving time in state prison and two more have fled the state.
Maybe you could talk to him about it. This could be so powerful if it is doable. So powerful!
bookmark
If you do, I’d be interested in hearing your opinion.
My takeaway is every elected and appointed position must be bonded. If they lose their bond due to their illegal actions or willful inactions, no other bond company will insure them. If they can’t get get bonded, they cannot work in any governmental capacity.
You know who else falls into that category? County election boards. If this is at all possible, here is a way to get rid of corrupt election officials or at least make them follow the law.
Another group is state college presidents and board of trustees. Lord, let this be possible. What away to get rid of the leftist lieutenants of the culture wars!
You know who else falls into that category? County election boards. If this is at all possible, here is a way to get rid of corrupt election officials or at least make them follow the law.
Another group is state college presidents and board of trustees. Lord, let this be possible. What away to get rid of the leftist lieutenants of the culture wars!
The problem that remains is finding a lawyer or law firm or organization that would vet this, and find a way to implement it far and wide. No easy task.
The best way is to utilize the system and bureaucracy against itself.
Might be tried and true, might be brand spanking new. But let’s see what can be done with it. We need to define better concepts such as malfeasance, misfeasance, and dereliction of duty. People have been getting a pass on this stuff for way too long.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.