Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The UK has recorded 5 times more Deaths in 12 months due to Covid-19 Vaccination than it has Deaths due to every other Vaccine combined in 21 years & Twitter doesn’t want you to find out…
dailyexpose.uk ^ | 1/18/2022 | THE EXPOSÉ

Posted on 01/18/2022 5:18:13 AM PST by ransomnote

ransomnote: Paypal stripped Daily Expose of services in order to help shut them down. Prayers up - may God grant the Expose all the funds needed to continue.

The UK Medicine Regulator has confirmed that over a period of twelve months the Covid-19 Vaccines have caused five times more deaths than the total number of deaths due to all other available vaccines combined in the past 21 years.

(Please note this article is a reprint of the same article found here – https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/18/uk-5-times-more-deaths-due-to-covid-vaccines/ – We have republished due to the fact that Twitter and its Fact Checkers added the original link to the “unsafe” list in an attempt to censor and bury the following information)

A Freedom of Information Request was made via email to the Medicine and Healthcare product Regulatory Agency (MHRA) on the 6th August 2021 in which a Mr Anderson asked the MHRA the following questions –

The MHRA responded with the usual “we do not hold this information”, as seen time and time again from Government departments.

However, they did confirm that they are using other epidemiological studies, anonymised GP-based electronic healthcare records and international experience to proactively monitor safety alongside the spontaneous reports received via the Yellow Card scheme.

The MHRA also confirmed that the current Covid-19 vaccines on offer in the United Kingdom are only under a temporary authorisation and that these authorisations do not constitute a marketing authorisation.

In answer to the question asked on the number of deaths due to all other vaccines in the past twenty years the MHRA provided the usual robotic response about how great the Covid-19 vaccines are and how they are the “single most effective treatment for preventing serious illness due to Covid-19” but what they did not do is say that they “do not hold this information”.

Instead they revealed that they had received a total of 404 reported adverse reactions to all available vaccines (excluding the Covid-19 injections) associated with a fatal outcome between the 1st January 2001 and the 25th August 2021 – a time frame of 20 years and 8 months.

But how does that fare against the number of reported adverse reactions to all temporarily authorised Covid-19 vaccines associated with a fatal outcome?

Well, since the Pfizer injection was rolled out in December 2020 there have been 684 reported deaths as of 5th Jan 22, meaning that in just 12 months , this “vaccine” alone outnumbers the deaths due to all other vaccines combined in the past 20 years.


Source

However, the AstraZeneca viral vector injection has fared much worse with 1,182 deaths being reported to the MHRA since January 2020, nearly three times as many deaths as what have been reported due to all other vaccines in the past 20 years.


Source

There have also been 29 reported deaths due to the Moderna jab since it was first administered in June 2021, and 37 deaths where the brand of Covid-19 vaccine was not specified in the report.


Source

Source

Therefore, up to January 5th 2022 there have been a grand total of 1,932 deaths reported to the MHRA as adverse reactions to all available Covid-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom since the beginning of the year.

Meaning there have officially been nearly 5 times as many deaths in just 12 months due to the Covid-19 vaccines than there have been due to every other available vaccine combined since the year 2001.



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: antivaxxhysteria; clickbait4qtards; covaxdeaths; dailyexcrement; fakenews; garbagesource; randomnut; spamsomnote; vaccines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 01/18/2022 5:18:13 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt; datura; Fractal Trader; bagster; grey_whiskers; metmom; Jane Long; tatown; ...

PING


2 posted on 01/18/2022 5:18:36 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Alex, i’ll take:

“Social Media has to continue
their COUP d’etat
and their coverup of THEIR GENOCIDE ....
or they will HANG.”


3 posted on 01/18/2022 5:24:05 AM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Thanks for the post and the ping.


4 posted on 01/18/2022 5:43:22 AM PST by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
"Therefore, up to January 5th 2022 there have been a grand total of 1,932 deaths reported to the MHRA as adverse reactions to all available Covid-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom since the beginning of the year."

A well-done post (and I hardly think you would receive such a response from the CDC), and it looks like quite an indictment except that "outnumbers the deaths due to all other vaccines combined in the past 20 years" presupposes that the reporting for such has always been as faithful as now. Meanwhile a grand total of 1,932 deaths out of a total of 135,915,818 vaccine doses administered only calculates to well under 1% (0.001470588)

The https://dailyexpose.uk need to provide more objective stats rather than asking for money every few minutes.

5 posted on 01/18/2022 6:04:18 AM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save + be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I think the official counter-argument is simply: “Yeah, but you don’t understand.”

At this point, that may be the best they can offer.


6 posted on 01/18/2022 6:24:10 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (The experts are liars. The conspiracy theorists are the people who have figured out the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

At what point do we the people stand up say tell these authoritarian Jamokes that enough is enough.

Really - companies (leaders) are doubling down on vac mandates when all the evidence shows:
- omicron is unaffected by the vax
- treatments work against all strains
- omicron is not lethal to all but infirm

It is time to ridicule everyone mandating a vaccine.


7 posted on 01/18/2022 6:31:19 AM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
The UK has recorded 5 times more Deaths in 12 months due to Covid-19 Vaccination...

Hey, look. The dailyexpose.uk is lying again!

Simple question: do you believe a death reported to VAERS or EudraVigilaence is necessarily a death due to the vaccine?

8 posted on 01/18/2022 7:03:50 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Twitter = Twaddle


9 posted on 01/18/2022 7:04:17 AM PST by antidemoncrat (somRead more at: https://economicti Astronomers see white dwarf 'switch on and off' for first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

And then there’s the life long health problems caused by the jab and the first booster and the second booster and the third booster and the ...


10 posted on 01/18/2022 8:14:06 AM PST by bgill (Which came first, the vax or the virus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Thank God for sources who are willing to report what the MSM and medical/pharm establishment doesn’t want you to know.


11 posted on 01/18/2022 9:46:31 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semimojo
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled The UK has recorded 5 times more Deaths in 12 months due to Covid-19 Vaccination than it has Deaths due to every other Vaccine combined in 21 years & Twitter doesn’t want you to find out…semimojo wrote:
The UK has recorded 5 times more Deaths in 12 months due to Covid-19 Vaccination...

Hey, look. The dailyexpose.uk is lying again!

Simple question: do you believe a death reported to VAERS or EudraVigilaence is necessarily a death due to the vaccine?

*

Your distortion doesn't matter. Whatever proportion of deaths PUBLISHED to VAERS (CDC has withheld Covid reports from VAERS) doesn't change the fact that Covid 'vaccines' dwarf all other vaccines in terms of reports of deaths. That ol game you play doesn't explain it away.

12 posted on 01/18/2022 12:19:36 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled The UK has recorded 5 times more Deaths in 12 months due to Covid-19 Vaccination than it has Deaths due to every other Vaccine combined in 21 years & Twitter doesn’t want you to find out…daniel1212 wrote:
"Therefore, up to January 5th 2022 there have been a grand total of 1,932 deaths reported to the MHRA as adverse reactions to all available Covid-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom since the beginning of the year."

A well-done post (and I hardly think you would receive such a response from the CDC), and it looks like quite an indictment except that "outnumbers the deaths due to all other vaccines combined in the past 20 years" presupposes that the reporting for such has always been as faithful as now. Meanwhile a grand total of 1,932 deaths out of a total of 135,915,818 vaccine doses administered only calculates to well under 1% (0.001470588)

The https://dailyexpose.uk need to provide more objective stats rather than asking for money every few minutes.

*

Your post is the calling-card of dishonesty displayed by those making excuses and encouraging the acceptance of the clot shot.

As many times as it's been said, debated, published and announced - you have to know at this point that your data is wildly underestimated. You have no excuse. All the abuses, threats, firings of staff for trying to report to VAERS, all the doctors who say they don't know what VAERS is or that it takes too long (unpaid work) to report a single case (45 minutes), all the ways people have proven that VAERS underestimates. You know that your estimate has to be 100 or more times too low. 

My conscience wouldn't let me try to manipulate people into accepting a biowarfare agent but for some reason, yours has no objection to your actions.

13 posted on 01/18/2022 12:25:55 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Simple question: do you believe a death reported to VAERS or EudraVigilaence is necessarily a death due to the vaccine?

Your distortion doesn't matter. Whatever proportion of deaths PUBLISHED to VAERS (CDC has withheld Covid reports from VAERS) doesn't change the fact...

As I suspected you won't answer the direct question but your answer indicates you know dailyexpose.uk is flat out lying when they equate reported adverse event deaths with vaccine deaths.

Yet you keep posting their garbage here.

Do you really have this little respect for your fellow FReepers?

14 posted on 01/18/2022 1:09:37 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
"Your post is the calling-card of dishonesty displayed by those making excuses and encouraging the acceptance of the clot shot. As many times as it's been said, debated, published and announced - you have to know at this point that your data is wildly underestimated. You have no excuse. All the abuses, threats, firings of staff for trying to report to VAERS, all the doctors who say they don't know what VAERS is or that it takes too long (unpaid work) to report a single case (45 minutes), all the ways people have proven that VAERS underestimates. You know that your estimate has to be 100 or more times too low. My conscience wouldn't let me try to manipulate people into accepting a biowarfare agent but for some reason, yours has no objection to your actions."

Rather, it is the like of YOU who is irrationally playing into the enemies hands imagining you can refute the arguments for vaccine mandates by (on one hand) posting an article quoting official sources on negative vax events in order to make a case against vaccine mandates, while not analyzing and anticipating how that argument can be nullified in the light or percentages, which is actually what matters when you are trying to make your case!

Many liberals do the same such as in quoting that more crimes are committed by whites than blacks but ignoring that the percentage relative their population shows that more crimes per capita are committed by the later (culture being the problem).

Thus this attempt simply makes the dailyexpose.uk look ignorant or deceptive and its fans to be gullible. But then in response you argue something that the dailyexpose.uk did not in the article, which is to charge that the VAERS data is wildly underestimated, which I believe it is to a significant degree, yet that is not something we can substantially prove as yet, since anecdotal reports and individual is not going to do it, though there is the correlation argument of increased death rates under vaccination In contrast, in opposition to the long-term all ages and restrictions on freedom of movement, association, speech and even breathing and for mandated vaccination, I use the CDC data to show that its Case Fatality Rate (CFR) rates are inflated, and that the CFT rates are very low for the young and vastly lower for the majority of the population than the elderly, while it is preventable comorbidities that drive the death rates for the majority, and which need to be the focus.

In addition to which providing much research material (with 300 footnotes so far) from major and medical sources on the same and on immunity, and while provide more as the data becomes more substantiated.

When making an argument, we need to examine if and how it could be countered, and deal with objections with valid substantiation if indeed our argument is sound. Faced with recalcitrant opposition, the Lord Jesus Himself invoked Scripture, the authority of which was accepted by the opposition, and thereby put them to silence, and exposed them as erroneous.

However, there does come a point in which such repeatedly dismiss soundly reasoned and substantiated arguments, and thus they can be left to their chosen delusions.

Grace and peace thru Jesus the Lord.

15 posted on 01/18/2022 6:35:27 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save + be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

All that smoke and mirrors and you won’t admit you exaggerated by at least a factor of 100? Not even the CDC claims that all asdverse events are in VAERS, particularly since a) the Harvard study proved it was 1% of the total BEFORE it became politically incorrect to report to VAERS. YOu’ll lie like that and scold me?


16 posted on 01/18/2022 7:50:05 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled The UK has recorded 5 times more Deaths in 12 months due to Covid-19 Vaccination than it has Deaths due to every other Vaccine combined in 21 years & Twitter doesn’t want you to find out…daniel1212 wrote:
"Your post is the calling-card of dishonesty displayed by those making excuses and encouraging the acceptance of the clot shot. As many times as it's been said, debated, published and announced - you have to know at this point that your data is wildly underestimated. You have no excuse. All the abuses, threats, firings of staff for trying to report to VAERS, all the doctors who say they don't know what VAERS is or that it takes too long (unpaid work) to report a single case (45 minutes), all the ways people have proven that VAERS underestimates. You know that your estimate has to be 100 or more times too low. My conscience wouldn't let me try to manipulate people into accepting a biowarfare agent but for some reason, yours has no objection to your actions."

Rather, it is the like of YOU who is irrationally playing into the enemies hands imagining you can refute the arguments for vaccine mandates by (on one hand) posting an article quoting official sources on negative vax events in order to make a case against vaccine mandates, while not analyzing and anticipating how that argument can be nullified in the light or percentages, which is actually what matters when you are trying to make your case!

Many liberals do the same such as in quoting that more crimes are committed by whites than blacks but ignoring that the percentage relative their population shows that more crimes per capita are committed by the later (culture being the problem).

Thus this attempt simply makes the dailyexpose.uk look ignorant or deceptive and its fans to be gullible. But then in response you argue something that the dailyexpose.uk did not in the article, which is to charge that the VAERS data is wildly underestimated, which I believe it is to a significant degree, yet that is not something we can substantially prove as yet, since anecdotal reports and individual is not going to do it, though there is the correlation argument of increased death rates under vaccination In contrast, in opposition to the long-term all ages and restrictions on freedom of movement, association, speech and even breathing and for mandated vaccination, I use the CDC data to show that its Case Fatality Rate (CFR) rates are inflated, and that the CFT rates are very low for the young and vastly lower for the majority of the population than the elderly, while it is preventable comorbidities that drive the death rates for the majority, and which need to be the focus.

In addition to which providing much research material (with 300 footnotes so far) from major and medical sources on the same and on immunity, and while provide more as the data becomes more substantiated.

When making an argument, we need to examine if and how it could be countered, and deal with objections with valid substantiation if indeed our argument is sound. Faced with recalcitrant opposition, the Lord Jesus Himself invoked Scripture, the authority of which was accepted by the opposition, and thereby put them to silence, and exposed them as erroneous.

However, there does come a point in which such repeatedly dismiss soundly reasoned and substantiated arguments, and thus they can be left to their chosen delusions.

Grace and peace thru Jesus the Lord.


You know that VAERS is 'wildly' under reported. You and your kind pretend that's a rumor and then you downplay risk. At a time when the CDC/FAUCI/NIH/FDA are downplaying risk - you're right along side them, helping them do it.

18 Reasons I Won't Be Getting a Covid Vaccine (deconstructingconventional.com)

Written by Christian Elliot, April 5, 2021

"According to a study done by Harvard (at the commission of our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to the National Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS) - read page 6 at the link above.

While the problems with VAERS have not been fixed (as you can read about in this letter to the CDC), at the time of this writing VAERS reports over 2,200 deaths from the current covid vaccines, as well as close to 60,000 adverse reactions.

"VAERS data released today showed 50,861 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 2,249 deaths and 7,726 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and March 26, 2021."

And those numbers don't include (what is currently) 578 cases of Bell's Palsy.

If those numbers are still only 1% of the total adverse reactions (or .8 to 2% of what this study published recently in the JAMA found), you can do the math, but that equates to somewhere around 110,000 to 220,000 deaths from the vaccines to date, and a ridiculous number of adverse reactions."

New Scientific Study finds at least 400,000 Americans may have died due to the Covid-19 Vaccines


17 posted on 01/18/2022 8:05:31 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
"All that smoke and mirrors and you won’t admit you exaggerated by at least a factor of 100? Not even the CDC claims that all asdverse events are in VAERS, particularly since a) the Harvard study proved it was 1% of the total BEFORE it became politically incorrect to report to VAERS. YOu’ll lie like that and scold me?"

So true to form, you must resort to an utterly baseless charge of smoke and mirrors, which is actually on the part of dailyexpose.uk since its argument was not that of the estimated adverse vaccination events, but those which were officially reported, and which numbers it used as being alarming, yet 1,932 reported deaths do not even represent 1% of all the vaccinations.

THAT is the argument I reproved, and which was not with the motive of defending mandated vaccination.

Then in response to my warranted correction of a fallacious argument, you invoke estimated unreported adverse vaccination events - which again, I myself believe that are many more than what are reported, but which also pertains to other vaccinations - but which is NOT the argument dailyexpose.uk was making. Thus if anyone is employing something akin to smoke and mirrors it is thee.

Thus you can argue on the basis of estimated unreported adverse vaccination events, yet then you must face the issue of establishing that these were in fact due to the vaccination. One could counter that since over 7,000 Americans die every day of various causes, then if everyone was vaccinated then that could be blamed for it. Therefore the excess death statistics since vaccination began would be a better argument, if in fact it the correlation can be established as causation.

However, if we just uncritically take as fact whatever headline or story we read since it supports the case we want to make, then we are not going to actually present a proper argument. such is not even one perct

18 posted on 01/18/2022 8:44:12 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save + be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled The UK has recorded 5 times more Deaths in 12 months due to Covid-19 Vaccination than it has Deaths due to every other Vaccine combined in 21 years & Twitter doesn’t want you to find out…daniel1212 wrote:
"All that smoke and mirrors and you won’t admit you exaggerated by at least a factor of 100? Not even the CDC claims that all asdverse events are in VAERS, particularly since a) the Harvard study proved it was 1% of the total BEFORE it became politically incorrect to report to VAERS. YOu’ll lie like that and scold me?"

So true to form, you must resort to an utterly baseless charge of smoke and mirrors, which is actually on the part of dailyexpose.uk since its argument was not that of the estimated adverse vaccination events, but those which were officially reported, and which numbers it used as being alarming, yet 1,932 reported deaths do not even represent 1% of all the vaccinations.

THAT is the argument I reproved, and which was not with the motive of defending mandated vaccination.

Then in response to my warranted correction of a fallacious argument, you invoke estimated unreported adverse vaccination events - which again, I myself believe that are many more than what are reported, but which also pertains to other vaccinations - but which is NOT the argument dailyexpose.uk was making. Thus if anyone is employing something akin to smoke and mirrors it is thee.

Thus you can argue on the basis of estimated unreported adverse vaccination events, yet then you must face the issue of establishing that these were in fact due to the vaccination. One could counter that since over 7,000 Americans die every day of various causes, then if everyone was vaccinated then that could be blamed for it. Therefore the excess death statistics since vaccination began would be a better argument, if in fact it the correlation can be established as causation.

However, if we just uncritically take as fact whatever headline or story we read since it supports the case we want to make, then we are not going to actually present a proper argument. such is not even one perct

 

"Thus you can argue on the basis of estimated unreported adverse vaccination events, yet then you must face the issue of establishing that these were in fact due to the vaccination. One could counter that since over 7,000 Americans die every day of various causes, then if everyone was vaccinated then that could be blamed for it. Therefore the excess death statistics since vaccination began would be a better argument, if in fact it the correlation can be established as causation."

You people just haven't thought it through and fling whatever is at hand at the truth when it surfaces beneath the crust of MSM and shill distortions.

For example, your kind pretends not to 'see' the problem here: COVID Vaccine Data (openvaers.com)

So, if these were deaths really attributable to other causes, why is every other vaccine in VAERS radically different in the number of unrelated deaths? Why is it only the COvid 'vaccines' that dwarf all other vaccines in VAERS 30 year history for deaths, strokes, heart attacks, blood clots, thrombocytopenia, paralysis etc. etc. etc..

Why don't the flu vaccines have the same problem the Covid 'vaccines' have with unrelated deaths?

There's your causality. If there were no relation to the vax, the vars would be similar in height.

Why are 70% of all deaths in VAERS for the last 30 years attributed to one vaccine, Covid, given for 1 year?

Oh, but go ahead, pretend you don't see it.

19 posted on 01/18/2022 9:00:09 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
"You know that VAERS is 'wildly' under reported. You and your kind pretend that's a rumor and then you downplay risk. "

No, I said, "I believe it is to a significant degree" and neither was I attacking your argument at the outset, but that of the argument dailyexpose.uk made in the articvle you posted, bu thus you continue to read to what was not said, both by the article and me, and seem to attack anyone that does not sing perfectly in tune with you.

However, thanks for the links (esp. this one I dug down to) as regards the underreported argument relative to the danger of the vaccines (and at 69 I am not, nor have had to see a doctor in about 40 years, thank God). The real problem is the unprecedented poor health of Americans (73% overweight; 42% obese).

20 posted on 01/18/2022 9:06:02 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save + be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson