| "Your post is the calling-card of dishonesty displayed by those making excuses and encouraging the acceptance of the clot shot. As many times as it's been said, debated, published and announced - you have to know at this point that your data is wildly underestimated. You have no excuse. All the abuses, threats, firings of staff for trying to report to VAERS, all the doctors who say they don't know what VAERS is or that it takes too long (unpaid work) to report a single case (45 minutes), all the ways people have proven that VAERS underestimates. You know that your estimate has to be 100 or more times too low. My conscience wouldn't let me try to manipulate people into accepting a biowarfare agent but for some reason, yours has no objection to your actions." Rather, it is the like of YOU who is irrationally playing into the enemies hands imagining you can refute the arguments for vaccine mandates by (on one hand) posting an article quoting official sources on negative vax events in order to make a case against vaccine mandates, while not analyzing and anticipating how that argument can be nullified in the light or percentages, which is actually what matters when you are trying to make your case! Many liberals do the same such as in quoting that more crimes are committed by whites than blacks but ignoring that the percentage relative their population shows that more crimes per capita are committed by the later (culture being the problem). Thus this attempt simply makes the dailyexpose.uk look ignorant or deceptive and its fans to be gullible. But then in response you argue something that the dailyexpose.uk did not in the article, which is to charge that the VAERS data is wildly underestimated, which I believe it is to a significant degree, yet that is not something we can substantially prove as yet, since anecdotal reports and individual is not going to do it, though there is the correlation argument of increased death rates under vaccination In contrast, in opposition to the long-term all ages and restrictions on freedom of movement, association, speech and even breathing and for mandated vaccination, I use the CDC data to show that its Case Fatality Rate (CFR) rates are inflated, and that the CFT rates are very low for the young and vastly lower for the majority of the population than the elderly, while it is preventable comorbidities that drive the death rates for the majority, and which need to be the focus. In addition to which providing much research material (with 300 footnotes so far) from major and medical sources on the same and on immunity, and while provide more as the data becomes more substantiated. When making an argument, we need to examine if and how it could be countered, and deal with objections with valid substantiation if indeed our argument is sound. Faced with recalcitrant opposition, the Lord Jesus Himself invoked Scripture, the authority of which was accepted by the opposition, and thereby put them to silence, and exposed them as erroneous. However, there does come a point in which such repeatedly dismiss soundly reasoned and substantiated arguments, and thus they can be left to their chosen delusions. Grace and peace thru Jesus the Lord. |