Posted on 01/17/2022 8:26:45 PM PST by ransomnote
For nearly two years the people of the UK have been repeatedly ordered to stay at home, wear masks, and get vaccinated in order to protect the NHS and save lives. Lockdown after lockdown, restriction after restriction.
Millions of lives have been put on hold, millions of others have been ruined. Millions of jobs have been lost, thousands of businesses are now closed forever.
But a huge majority of the British people think it has all been worth it, and absolutely necessary due to the fear propaganda that has played on a 24/7 loop on their television screens, and headlined every newspaper over the past two years.
Because the British public have been led to believe that over one-hundred-and-fifty-thousand people have died of Covid-19, and they’ve been told that number would have been much higher if they had not complied with the destruction of the economy and decimation of their lives.
But now we can confirm without a shadow of a doubt that the 150k number is an outright lie thanks to a recent response to a Freedom of Information Request made to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), in which the ONS confirms that just 17,371 people have died of Covid-19 over the past two years.
The UK Government claims via the Covid-19 dashboard that as of January 13th 2022, there have been 151,855 Covid-19 deaths throughout the UK since March 2020.
The public have also been constantly reminded of this false claim via the mainstream media, with the most recent fear-mongering headlines coming on the 8th January in which the BBC echoed the UK Governments false claim that 150,000 had died of Covid-19 in the UK.
Blink and you’ll miss it but it’s worth noting that the BBC chose to run with the headline the ‘UK records more than 150,000 deaths’. The key word here being record, because the UK Government can record whatever they like but this does not reflect the true number of Covid-19 deaths.
The UK Medicine Regulator has also reminded the public of the falsely claimed number of Covid-19 deaths each week at the very beginning of its Coronavirus Vaccine – Weekly Summary of Yellow Card Reporting, where anyone can take a look at the 1 million+ adverse reactions and deaths that have been reported against the Covid-19 vaccines.
In a report published January 13th the MHRA claimed that “at the time of this report, over 149,541 people across the UK have died within 28 days of a positive test for Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccination is the single most effective way to reduce deaths…”.
But all of these institutions are lying to you, because the Office for National Statistics have confirmed in a response to a Freedom of Information request that as of the end of quarter 3 in 2021 just 17,371 people had actually died of Covid-19.
Meaning less people have lost their lives due to Covid-19 in nearly two years than the average of around 30,000 people who lose their lives during a single bad flu year in the UK.
The request for the true number of deaths was made some time prior to December 16th 2021 and the Office for National Statistics responded with the following –
As you can clearly see these numbers add up to nowhere near the 150,000 Covid-19 deaths claimed by the UK Government and mainstream media, and if we add up the total number of deaths by the end of quarter 3 in 2021 we can see that the Covid-19 vaccines haven’t really had very much effect in reducing the number of deaths.
According to the ONS there were 9,400 Covid-19 deaths between March 1st and December 31st 2020. The firs Covid-19 vaccine was administered on December 8th 2020 and the elderly and most vulnerable to Covid-19 were prioritised first. So it’s strange to find that during the first three quarters of 2021 there were a further 7,971 Covid-19 deaths when the Covid-19 vaccines are allegedly 95% at reducing the risk of death due to Covid-19.
The above chart demonstrates perfectly the absurdity of the 150,000 Covid-19 death lie that has been perpetuated by the UK Government and mainstream media to justify two years of Draconian restrictions.
According to the Office for National Statistics between March 2020 and the end of quarter 3 2021, just 13,597 people over the age of 65 died of Covid-19, and just 3,774 people under the age of 65 died of Covid-19.
So why on earth did the UK Government demand that the entire population stay at home?
Why did school children have their education ruined?
Why did teenagers have their young lives ruined?
Why were new parents left in isolation to struggle alone without the help of their families?
Why were people unable to say goodbye to their loved ones?
Why were the elderly and vulnerable left in total isolation in care homes?
Why has the NHS turned into the National Vaccination Service?
One-hundred-and-fifty-thousand Covid-19 deaths in two years? Pull the other one. The ONS has confirmed that their have only been just over 17,000.
PING
The gig is up.
Such a global conspiracy. Russia complicit. South Korea. Peru. Everywhere is signing onto the DNC position that the virus actually kills people.
It kills mostly old people, nearly all of whom have other health issues because that is what old does. But maybe not. Maybe old people have these health issues because they, too, globally, are part of the conspiracy.
4 MINUTES ON FAUCI THE FELON!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aaSaAho6uVPA/
Most COVID deaths are due to suppressed immune systems due to preexisting conditions. However, if they hadn't been infected with COVID, their failed immune system wouldn't have dealt with COVID and lost the battle.
Bttt
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled 150k Covid-19 Deaths? – The ONS state in black and white that just 17,000 people have died of Covid-19 in the past 2 years, jonrick46 wrote: |
Most COVID deaths are due to suppressed immune systems due to preexisting conditions. However, if they hadn't been infected with COVID, their failed immune system wouldn't have dealt with COVID and lost the battle. |
*
False - two times over.
1. By your reasoning any number of illnesses could have done that, nothing specific to Covid. Nothing new in the history of illness. We just haven't shut down our economy for pneumonia or flu that could sicken the vulnerable before. In the past, we protected and treated the vulnerable and let the healthy go to work and live their lives.
2. Many of these people were denied all treatments. Normally we treat sick people but this time, they were denied all treatment and allowed to become seriously ill and die without appropriate medicinal attention. Our live spans and history of illness would all be different if we used Covid protocols (i.e., go home and die without treatment, or be hospitalized and actively killed with intubation, isolation, immobilization, Remdesivir and Midazolam).
The “65 and over” category is misleading, because while the death rate, broken down, is higher in the 65-80 yr old group than in the bracket just below it, it gets higher after 80 and even higher after 90. Lumping them together makes it look much more drastic, when in reality, most of the people who died from it had already exceeded average life expectancy and probably were in the frail elderly category, especially if they were already hospitalized or in care facilities.
So in other words…it’s “the old man’s friend,” pneumonia in one form or another, which has been the possible complication of any flu or cold infection throughout the history of mankind. If they hadn’t given it a name and then found a handy use for it (installing global tyranny and making a lot of money for Fauci), it would barely be a blip on the health radar. This is especially the case since the flu seems to have disappeared during this “panic-demic .” It’s not easily possible to distinguish between the symptoms or complications of the two, and they never tested for flu - so probably even many of the supposed Covid deaths were due to the flu virus. But the panic was just too useful to pass up.
63% of Canada’s 31,000+ deaths are people 80 and over... And the vast majority were DNR cases... Do Not Resuscitate. When you enter a hospital or nursing home in Canada and you’re 80 and over, they hound you to sign a DNR form... Most end up succumbing to this constant badgering.
And if you count the deaths of those under 60... They only account for about 2,100 of those 31 thousand deaths.
It will be interesting to see how the shills try to spin this one.
So, if you had a way to avoid the miserable death a person suffers from a COVID infection, wouldn’t you want that way. Before you answer, consider the Golden Rule. Or, have we gone so far from being a Christian nation?
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled 150k Covid-19 Deaths? – The ONS state in black and white that just 17,000 people have died of Covid-19 in the past 2 years, jonrick46 wrote: |
So, if you had a way to avoid the miserable death a person suffers from a COVID infection, wouldn’t you want that way. Before you answer, consider the Golden Rule. Or, have we gone so far from being a Christian nation? |
I knew you were spineless, but your most recent soulless comment broadens my assessment.
You know, we could just treat them instead of 'putting them down' like dogs. Zelenko's protocol saves 85% of high risk (elderly with comorbidities) people otherwise denied all treatments.
Let's not execute the elderly and the fragile. Let's treat them like humans deserving of life. Why, with the thousands and thousands of dollars flooding into hospitals for their capture/kills, we could even spring for a few doses of Ivermectin. C'mon, dig deep!
The failure of creating treatments I attribute to the spineless, incompetent, Biden Administration. We have a "multi-cantaloupe as the POTUS"--Matt Walsh.
I understand that the infection creates natural immunity that may be better than the immunity from the vaccine. However, letting that be the principle method of immunity will pay the price of people dying a miserable, lonely death. Of course, they wouldn't have to die in the first place if we had the treatments.
Doc, the case for Ivermectin has to be made through clinical trials to be accepted by the AMA. Even though it was found effective for head lice, rosacea, intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis, rules required clinical trials for use as treatment for COVID. So, trials were performed and failed like the latest one which was found to have, I quote, "shocking revelations of widespread flaws in the data . . . on 14 July, after internet sleuths raised concerns about plagiarism and data manipulation, the preprint server Research Square withdrew the paper because of “ethical concerns.” The clinical trial was a fraud. So, when the money is spent on a legitimate clinical trial of Ivermectin, we are just as lost as Eric Baldwin with a gun.
We live in a Bizarro World, Doc, where so many just deny the data. If you have the data, tell us what you think would be the best way to mitigate the virus. Don't give me grief and waste your time saying how spineless I am. Give it your best shot!
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled 150k Covid-19 Deaths? – The ONS state in black and white that just 17,000 people have died of Covid-19 in the past 2 years, jonrick46 wrote: |
| Excerpt of post by jonrick46: Doc, the case for Ivermectin has to be made through clinical trials to be accepted by the AMA. Even though it was found effective for head lice, rosacea, intestinal strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis, rules required clinical trials for use as treatment for COVID. So, trials were performed and failed like the latest one which was found to have, I quote, "shocking revelations of widespread flaws in the data . . . on 14 July, after internet sleuths raised concerns about plagiarism and data manipulation, the preprint server Research Square withdrew the paper because of “ethical concerns.” The clinical trial was a fraud. So, when the money is spent on a legitimate clinical trial of Ivermectin, we are just as lost as Eric Baldwin with a gun. We live in a Bizarro World, Doc, where so many just deny the data. If you have the data, tell us what you think would be the best way to mitigate the virus. Don't give me grief and waste your time saying how spineless I am. Give it your best shot! |
You hit bottom already, and now you're just digging a hole.
"Doc, the case for Ivermectin has to be made through clinical trials to be accepted by the AMA."
Well, you see that is false. Until Covid, doctors wrote off label. But once the biowarfare began, doctors were threatened, fired etc. as were pharmacists for functioning like healers.
Fauci took the WORST DRUG in an ebola trial, removed first because the risks outweighed potential benefits and 53% of patients died, and he repurposed it for Covid. Remdesivir is killing people - it did so during the trial, it's doing so now on patients in hospitals.
Ivermectin doesn't kill people. It's one of the safest medicines out there and an 'essential medicine' according to the world health organization. You don't even need a prescription for it in Japan and this has been true for decades. Freepers are using it to save lives and they post about it on FR.
So don't tell me that you can snatch Remdesivir from the drug trial in which it was killing more than half the patients who received it and then VOILA! Bless it with the AMA and you're done! But that's what they must have done, according to you.
Ivermectin works and is safe. Decades of use - noted for its safety record.
They didn't need that tricked up fraudulent study when they have decades of work on Ivermectin. It's disgusting you're carrying water for those who are methodically killing us.
“ethical concerns.” What about denying dying patients the right to try a safe medicine? They're dying, why not let them have Ivermectin? Is that ethical?
How about denying all treatment to elderly sick people with multiple co-morbiditities and just telling them to go home until they can't breath, and intubating them even when you know 85% will not survive that 'therapy'? That pegs your ethics meter, does it?
Pfizer has committed fraud in its trials and refused to provide informed consent and is working to hide its raw data for 75 years? Ethical? That's your preference?
There are lists, and lists of Ivermectin studies that people post and share and you're pretending it's unknown and we just have to follow procedure when Fauci and Co have violated our Constitutional Rights, human rights, the Nuremberg Code and created new procedures to deny people treatment.
You aren't worth the time. You're laboring for our enemies as they work to kill us. That's your ethics showing. You're boneless, not merely spineless.
Ivermectin has been proven safe from the ADA approval process that required clinical trial. However, it has not tested effective as a treatment for COVID-19. A review of the medical literature by the Cochrane Library analyzed 14 randomized controlled clinical trials for Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 infections.6 The Cochrane Library is an organization that examines published studies of medical research to collect data and determine the best evidence-based choices for medical treatments. The 14 studies had enrolled nearly 1,700 patients and compared Ivermectin use to either no treatment, a placebo, or the standard of care for a respiratory infection.
“Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of Ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19,” the Cochrane review concluded. “The completed studies are small, and few are considered high quality.” As I told you before, the last clinical trial was found to have fraudulent data. The studies that are finished have yielded little evidence of effectiveness. Some were halted due to lack of benefit along the way. Others have been retracted. So, when are they going start another clinical trial?
The CDC, FDA, and AMA all advise against its use against COVID-19 because there is no evidence it works. Gregory Poland, MD, spokesperson for the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), tells Verywell. “If Ivermectin were a miracle cure, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), IDSA, and specialty physician societies would be touting it and pushing it, like they are for vaccines and for monoclonal antibodies, but they’re not.” “You can search for substantial evidence of effectiveness for Ivermectin and you will come up empty handed,” Peter Lurie, MD, MPH, president of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, tells Verywell. “The fact is that there are a large number of trials of Ivermectin that have been done, but the great majority of them are lacking in terms of the fundamentals of clinical trial design.” Proven effectiveness is just as important for FDA authorization or approval. The same people who are demanding more testing for vaccines are saying that Ivermectin should be used, regardless of lack of studies.
Finally Poland says, ““Show me the [Ivermectin] studies. Show me the quality of the studies. Tell me what kind of study design was used—ask the same questions that people rightfully demand of any vaccine, antiviral drug, or monoclonal antibodies,” Poland says. “They have to live by the same scientific rules.”
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled 150k Covid-19 Deaths? – The ONS state in black and white that just 17,000 people have died of Covid-19 in the past 2 years, jonrick46 wrote: |
Ivermectin has been proven safe from the ADA approval process that required clinical trial. However, it has not tested effective as a treatment for COVID-19. A review of the medical literature by the Cochrane Library analyzed 14 randomized controlled clinical trials for Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 infections.6 The Cochrane Library is an organization that examines published studies of medical research to collect data and determine the best evidence-based choices for medical treatments. The 14 studies had enrolled nearly 1,700 patients and compared Ivermectin use to either no treatment, a placebo, or the standard of care for a respiratory infection. “Based on the current very low‐ to low‐certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of Ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID‐19,” the Cochrane review concluded. “The completed studies are small, and few are considered high quality.” As I told you before, the last clinical trial was found to have fraudulent data. The studies that are finished have yielded little evidence of effectiveness. Some were halted due to lack of benefit along the way. Others have been retracted. So, when are they going start another clinical trial? The CDC, FDA, and AMA all advise against its use against COVID-19 because there is no evidence it works. Gregory Poland, MD, spokesperson for the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), tells Verywell. “If Ivermectin were a miracle cure, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), IDSA, and specialty physician societies would be touting it and pushing it, like they are for vaccines and for monoclonal antibodies, but they’re not.” “You can search for substantial evidence of effectiveness for Ivermectin and you will come up empty handed,” Peter Lurie, MD, MPH, president of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, tells Verywell. “The fact is that there are a large number of trials of Ivermectin that have been done, but the great majority of them are lacking in terms of the fundamentals of clinical trial design.” Proven effectiveness is just as important for FDA authorization or approval. The same people who are demanding more testing for vaccines are saying that Ivermectin should be used, regardless of lack of studies. Finally Poland says, ““Show me the [Ivermectin] studies. Show me the quality of the studies. Tell me what kind of study design was used—ask the same questions that people rightfully demand of any vaccine, antiviral drug, or monoclonal antibodies,” Poland says. “They have to live by the same scientific rules.” |
Still you dig, and expect me to take an interest?
" However, it has not tested effective as a treatment for COVID-19. "
Remdesivir does nothing to treat Covid. It only kills people by shutting down their organs. They knew this and they pushed it through the FDA approval process. It never tested effective as a treatment for anything - they just lied and pushed it through approval.
Oh, yes, those people killing us with Midazolam and REmdesivir just can't bring themselves to 'let' us try something they don't think is good enough? They didn't have to trust their fraudulent False Flag drug trial - there were people begging to volunteer to take it rather than die.
Moderna and Pfizer's 'vaccine' trials did not collect any data indicating whether or not it would stop infectivity or spread but they mandated it worldwide. They didn't have data it would stop infection, nor prevent spread but it didn't matte - they have been forcing it on the public world wide as fast as possible, even if people collapse on dose 1, they are often not exempted for dose 2 and boosters, even though there never was any clinical trial data collected to show if it worked. But that doesn't matter to you. It's midnight somehwere and you're here carrying water for people who are killing us. You chose the side of genocide and seem to like it.
If people are dying without a moment of actual treatment, ethically they should be given a right to try. This is 'mere' biowarfare so there are stupid excuses to rule out Ivermectin and deny all treatments to sick people until they are hospitalized, and then kill them with Remdesivir and Midazolam.
You post Peter Lurie like he's authoritative - well then have him walk through the weakenesses in the show-trial of Remdesivir. After it killed people in Africa, Fauci and Co mashed together a fake trial to justify using it for Covid. Still toxic and the trial was too short and had plenty of problems. But you shills doen't care - it's just kill, kill, and kill with you people.
"The same people who are demanding more testing for vaccines are saying that Ivermectin should be used, regardless of lack of studies."
People are suffering and dying because of the vax, Pfizer wants to hide the raw data they never released for another 75 years. Trust has been violated and is now gone - vaccines take about 10 yaers to make and these vaccines are intentionally killing and disabling in this biowarfare. YEs, I imagine somebody would like 'more testing' of vaxxes because they can't beleive their own medical services are exterminating us.
So vaccines are killing and disabling and you're comparing that to efficacy testing? Ivermectin is incredibly safe and tolerated world wide - no prescription in Japan required and it's not a problem. So Yes, people want to take Ivermectin, especially when friends, family and neighbors take Ivermectin horse paste and quickly recover.
Jonrick46, you're such a waste.
You bother to post "Gregory Poland, MD, spokesperson for the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), tells Verywell. “If Ivermectin were a miracle cure, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), IDSA, and specialty physician societies would be touting it and pushing it, like they are for vaccines and for monoclonal antibodies, but they’re not,” and you can't see the problem with it? NIH, IDSA have been touting vaccines that are killing us based on zero evidence they stop spread or infectivity according to the vaccine manufacturer. You see, I don't want to go through the motions of treating your false talking points as if they are serious - they're just obsolete propaganda.
Finally Poland says, ““Show me the [Ivermectin] studies. Show me the quality of the studies. Tell me what kind of study design was used—ask the same questions that people rightfully demand of any vaccine, antiviral drug, or monoclonal antibodies,” Poland says. “They have to live by the same scientific rules.”
The CDC/NIH/FDA have been making up new rules, laws, and violations of the Nuremberg Code without hesitation, and Poland wants to hold Ivermectin to higher standards? "People rightfully demand of any vaccine" that they not be lethal, that they be thoroughly tested, that they be granted informed consent, that the vaccine manufacturers hand over the raw data long ago, as is industry standard.
Pfizer reported a trial participant as having a stomach ache when in fact she was having siezures. She then became paraplegic and is working her way toward quadraplegia, and you bother to quote some evil traitor saying people have a right to know more about Ivermecin?
Don't waste my time with your propaganda. The narrative is failing and there's no hiding it. You and your lies and those you serve are being exposed, even if you hang around flinging propaganda and trying to pretend they didn't know. Didn't you see the reports that the Defense Department had proof that Ivermectin and HCQ worked, and all the key players knew it? There, in print - it worked and you are trying to pretend they were 'just following orders' and 'trying to make sure Ivermectin was good enough for use' when in fact you are laying cover for genocidal murderers. It's over, your kind just hasn't realized it yet.
I will, from the rabbit hole I have dug for myself, say that your statement, “NIH, IDSA have been touting vaccines that are killing us based on zero evidence they stop spread or infectivity according to the vaccine manufacturer.” is all hole diggings. The vaccine manufacturers have never said their vaccines are 100% effective. They have said they are 95% effective. However, the myths being spread by those like you surpass any supposed problems with the vaccines. Such myths that have took hold among the unvaccinated and solidified as their reasons not to get the shots have been the vaccine will make women sterile; the vaccines are too new; the shots have a microchip in them; the vaccine itself will give me COVID; I’m immune because I had COVID; breakthrough cases prove vaccines are useless; and the vaccines kill. But no matter how convincing and irrefutable the science and the data about the COVID-19 vaccines are, your misinformation persists.
FACT: As of August 9, the CDC said there had been 8,054 vaccinated people who were hospitalized or died who had also tested positive for coronavirus—out of more than 166 million fully vaccinated Americans. That’s roughly .005 percent. Additionally, CDC director Rochelle Walensky has said that 99.5 percent of all deaths from COVID-19 are in the unvaccinated.—Politifact
FACT: COVID vaccines have been shown to be very powerful in preventing more severe disease and the need for hospitalization. Breakthroughs occur at a much, much lower rate than in people who are unvaccinated. The breakthroughs have been occurring more frequently with the Delta variant because of the high level of infectiousness (or transmissibility) of the Delta variant and lower protection of current vaccines against this variant. But people having breakthroughs have much more mild infection, more like an upper respiratory infection. The vaccines prevent severe disease and complications and allow people to return to a more normal state.
FACT: “After people recover from infection with a virus, the immune system retains a memory of it,” the National Institutes of Health explains. While that’s good for the immune system, it also means that even after you recover from COVID, it’s still inside your body and can resurface. Studies have been unclear how long immunity lasts after having COVID—most experts believe anywhere from 90 days to six months, though it could be longer.—National Institutes of Health
FACT: The claim that coronavirus vaccines are killing people and will decimate the world’s population is FALSE, based on research. Public health officials say all three coronavirus vaccines approved for use in the U.S. are safe and effective at preventing infection. There is no evidence the vaccines cause deadly autoimmune disorders, and reports of blood clots following the Johnson & Johnson vaccine are extremely rare.
Fact-check sources:
Associated Press, Jan. 5, No evidence COVID-19 vaccines lead to autoimmune disease
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, accessed April 30, COVID Data Tracker
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, March 4, mRNA Vaccines
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, April 27, Reported Adverse Events
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, April 13, Joint CDC and FDA Statement on Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 Vaccine
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, April 25, J&J/Janssen Update
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, April 23, FDA and CDC Lift Recommended Pause on Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 Vaccine Use Following Thorough Safety Review
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, April 7, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
Food and Drug Administration, accessed April 29, COVID-19 Vaccines
Food and Drug Administration, Dec. 10, FDA Briefing Document: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine
Food and Drug Administration, Dec. 17, FDA Briefing Document: Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine
Food and Drug Administration, Feb. 26, FDA Briefing Document: Janssen Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine for the Prevention of COVID-19
Karina Reiss and Sucharit Bhakdi, Corona, False Alarm?: Facts and Figures
National Human Genome Research Institute, accessed April 30, Messenger RNA (mRNA)
The New American, April 15, Rumble video
The New York Times, April 13, Johnson & Johnson Vaccinations Paused After Rare Clotting Cases Emerge
PolitiFact, March 4, COVID-19 vaccine does not cause death, autoimmune diseases
PolitiFact, April 1, The COVID-19 vaccine is not an ‘operating system’ run by Bill Gates
Teyit via Poynter, Jan. 2, FALSE: Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi’s multiple coronavirus allegations
Red Pill University, April 22, Microbiologist Says Vaccines will Decimate World’s Population
USA TODAY, March 5, How mRNA vaccines work
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, accessed April 30, VAERS Data
You are the Deep State representative on FR. You quote the CDC, the FDA, the New York Times, the MSM and their paid fact checkers. You don’t even know WHY that’s a worthless waste of time.
You quote their talking points (i.e., fake ‘facts’) and ignore all the articles from around the world posted here daily demonstrating the failure and toxicity of the vaccines.
YOU.ARE.WASTING.MY.TIME
Within the last few days my wife has seen someone die because they had co-morbidities and were given Remdesivir.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
