Posted on 01/15/2022 9:24:56 AM PST by ransomnote
ransomnote: Paypal is trying to choke off donations going to fund the reporting at DailyExpose.uk (over the target). Prayers up that the DailyExpose will continue to survive Paypal's effort at censorship.
Since the beginning of the pandemic, experts have warned that the PCR test is not a valid diagnostic tool and produces far too many false positives, as it can pick up on “dead,” nonreplicating viral debris. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) now admits the PCR test cannot identify active infection or measure contagiousness.
A PCR test cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive, non-infectious, viral particles. This is why it cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated “cases” or positive tests with the actual illness in order to create the appearance of a pandemic.
Furthermore, a PCR test cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel Prize for his work, explained this as shown in the video below.
ransomnote: video available on DailyExpose webpage or on YOUTUBE.
If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it, with write-up and links, on Activist Post HERE.
Almost universally, health authorities have instructed labs to use excessively high cycle thresholds (“Ct”) — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — thereby ensuring a maximum of false positives.
From the start, experts noted that a Ct over 35 is scientifically unjustifiable, yet the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and the CDC recommended running PCR tests at a Ct of 40,5; the University of Queensland in Australia said that laboratory technicians were running PCR tests at 40 to 50 Ct; and the World Health Organization recommended a Ct of 45.
The pandemic of false positives was then used by world governments to implement pandemic countermeasures that have destroyed the global economy, ruined countless lives, decimated the education of an entire generation and stripped us of basic human rights and freedoms.
In a 30 December 2021 appearance on MSNBC, Dr. Anthony Fauci responded to questions about the updated CDC guidance. CDC director Rochelle Walensky also tried to make sense of the new guidance in a 29 December 2021 ABC News interview.
ransomnote: video available on DailyExpose webpage or on YOUTUBE.
Fauci was asked about how one can measure contagiousness. If the PCR can register positive for 12 weeks after an infection, it can’t be a reliable indicator of infectiousness. This was precisely the point that Mullis attempted to make in the video above with respect to PCR and HIV.
So, how can we tell if we’re infectious or not? Fauci confirmed that the PCR can only tell you there’s a presence or absence of viral fragments, not whether it’s an active infection, or whether you’re actually infectious. He did not, however, provide an answer to the question as to how one can measure contagiousness.
How is it that the CDC, and health officials in all countries for that matter, didn’t realise that the PCR test was picking up dead viral debris for three months, or longer, after infection? The facts that the test, a) was far too sensitive, and b) couldn’t identify active infection, were criticisms from the start. What the CDC’s belated admission means is that, for the past two years, people have unnecessarily wasted time in self-isolation — perhaps weeks — waiting for a negative test.
Sources and resources:
The headline should include that word "accurately," as it can indeed detect CV, and thus this lack of qualifier allows "fact checkers" to label it as false, just as they did with the statement by Dinesh D’Souza of “these cops using massive amounts of force against unarmed Trump supporters,” since there were armed protesters in the tunnel as well, and thus he should have said "including" unarmed Trump supporters. We are in a culture war.
And the problems with accuracy are not new, for months ago even the NYT printed this opinion piece:
"Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be," by Apoorva Mandavilli, Published Aug. 29, 2020 Updated July 3, 2021The PCR test amplifies genetic matter from the virus in cycles; the fewer cycles required, the greater the amount of virus, or viral load, in the sample. The greater the viral load, the more likely the patient is to be contagious.
In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.Tests with thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk — akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left, Dr. Mina said.Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,” she said.The C.D.C.’s own calculations suggest that it is extremely difficult to detect any live virus in a sample above a threshold of 33 cycles.
Yes, as I just pointed out, " PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection" is misleading, since it can detect CV-19 and thus it should include that word "accurately." What the dailyexpose.uk says Fauci actually said is another issue which I did not watch a vid to investigate, however, I have done some investigation in the PCR test which indeed suffers from inaccuracy, as is that you can test positive on a PCR test for only for “several days.”
ALBANY — A new study out of Albany Medical Center and Albany Medical College found that the standard test used to diagnose COVID-19 is sensitive enough to detect the coronavirus for days and even weeks after it’s no longer infectious. -https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/Albany-Med-study-finds-coronavirus-tests-can-16426019.php?IPID=Times-Union-HP-CP-Spotlight
On August 3, 2020, CDC updated its isolation guidance based on the latest science about COVID-19 showing that people can continue to test positive for up to 3 months after diagnosis and not be infectious to others. - https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/s0814-updated-isolation-guidance.html
New research published by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has found that recovered COVID-19 patients who test positive again aren’t infectious.
Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.
However, for some time the CDC had been combining test results that diagnose current coronavirus infections with test results that measure whether someone has ever had the virus and which inflated data was used to justify quarantines.
In addition to which is the broad degree of criteria allowed for classifying a death as due to Covid.
The PCR has tested postive on kiwi fruit, Coca Cola, and ‘Spanish Water’ but was inconclusive on motor oil.
The PCR was developed without the use of the actual virus - so it can indiscriminately detect materials, organic or not, and falsely flag them as ‘Covid’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.