Posted on 01/06/2022 6:55:50 AM PST by SeekAndFind
BTW, On the heels of this Brazilian study’s release, Twitter slapped a warning label on its distribution, calling it “Misleading” and preventing the document from being “replied to, shared or liked.”
Goes without saying.
And your point is ... ?????
A. Unless specifically prohibited by law, physicians are given leeway to prescribe medication for non-FDA-approved Off-Label use as their experience and conscience guides them.
B. Viagra was invented for treatment of high blood pressure and angina. When clinical trials showed it had little effect on angina but had a pronounced tendency to give all the men who took it boners, the FDA approved it for treatment of erectile dysfunction.
The clinical evidence clearly shows the efficacy of Ivermectin in preventing Covid infection and, once caught, reducing severity of symptoms. If Ivermectin were not being used as a political football, it would have FDA approval for fighting Covid.
And there are doctors who refuse to play the demoncrats silly-assed little game and are prescribing Ivermectin for preventing and treating Covid.
You tell yourself whatever lets you sleep at night but I'm not going to let something like the demoncrat's deliberate medical obstructionism stand in the way of the health and safety of me and my family.
The regimen for IVM as an antiparasitical is 0.15 mg/kg every 3 to 12 *months*. It’s not always possible to predict dose on the basis of half life of a drug.
No, not at all.
Bkmk
That’s libel. If I were the author of that study, I would sue the crap out of Twitter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.