Posted on 12/28/2021 12:49:12 PM PST by ransomnote
PING
Antibodies after getting it are better. I had it last October and I’ve been feeling great after I recovered. That’s my experience but....
“It is doubtful that anything will happen because the work wasn’t published in a peer-reviewed journal so will be ignored by the scientific community. That’s just the way it works.”
Translation, the paper wouldn’t hold up to a serious peer-review, so it wasn’t submitted for peer review anywhere.
How were the 15 dead bodies chosen?
What was the sample size?
this was the PLAN.
Xi. Xiden. FauXi. SoroX. GateXi. and WHO.
DEATH FOR ALL.
TRUTH IGNORED.
CHILDREN MURDERED IN UTERO with the Seal of the CDC and FDA.
Not even the Twilight Zone could have thought of this.
My doctor called me in a panic s few months back and said, “you haven't gotten vaccinated about fiver six times have you?”
Seems like my antibody levels were five or six times as high as a vaccinated person.
It all occurred naturally after having COVID. I haven't vaccinated at all and probably won't be.
They really should try harder at gaslighting because all they're accomplishing now is to insult our intelligence.
Translation: Peer review is a partisan-hack endeavor conducted in the same manner as banning dissenting opinions from Facebook, Twitter, etc.
Professional affirmative-action government bureaucrats/educrats are not scientists. They are politicians
well.. if substack.com says it’s true.. it must be!
*rolls eyes*
stop be gullible, your making us conservatives look bad.
>>If the autopsy findings are confirmed by other pathologists ...
>>if they are combined with the findings of Dr. Hoffe ...
>>if supported by further data ...
Thats a whole lot of ‘ifs’ that must come true in order to reach a questionable conclusion, but yeah, it’s substack so must be true.
Yes it would and I have a friend seriously ill after that booster shot. I am sick of Branch covidians acting like these poisson shots are normal because they are lethal.
World “official” data — --- and not to insult your intelligence.
( 5,351,786 “official” dead / 7,914,433,798 global population ) x 100 = 0.068 %
Also in plain language, the “official” toll of the “pandemic” in almost two years is less than seven one-hundreths of the population.
And for your entertainment, here is the WHO article from April 2020 showing how to heighten the profile of Covid as against other comorbidites in death certificates.
https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19.pdf
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results show 93% of people who died after being vaccinated were killed by the vaccine, TexasFreeper2009 wrote: |
well.. if substack.com says it’s true.. it must be! *rolls eyes* stop be gullible, your making us conservatives look bad. |
Stop contributing to genocide. You're making humanity look bad.
He's credible. He and his team presented at ACIP (Advisory committe to the FDA) and no one could refute his team's data, so the advisory committee elected not to recommend a booster. Steve Kirsch has offered 1 million dollars to the FDA/CDC/NIH/FAUCI etc. to discuss the data with his team - no takers. They fear him because his data has statistically defensible proof.
After epic lies by the CDC/Fauci, you elect to put your faith in them. That's what I call gullible.
A death due to COVID-19 may not be attributed to another disease (e.g. cancer) and should be counted independently of preexisting conditions that are suspected of triggering a severe course of COVID-19.
So...I guess any disease one dies of is fair game.
Earlier on they indicated that trauma cases should NOT be included. My guess is that infamous motorcycle incident made them look bad. People who are shot in Chicage will perhaps not be counted either. Good to know they at least harbor a modicum of a sense of shame.
It appears there is a new flavor of the week. Whoever the hell steve kirsh is.
Ooh, that's gonna leave a mark
Wow. A personal chastising from the high priestess. You have done well. In general one doesn’t have to offer a million dollars to get someone to chat with them. It’s amazing thst refusal of such an imbecilic stunt becomes proof that it must be true!!
I seem to remember a Latin phrase describing such an erudite argument.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Keep up the good fight. You touched a rail.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results show 93% of people who died after being vaccinated were killed by the vaccine, qwerty1234 wrote: |
“It is doubtful that anything will happen because the work wasn’t published in a peer-reviewed journal so will be ignored by the scientific community. That’s just the way it works.” Translation, the paper wouldn’t hold up to a serious peer-review, so it wasn’t submitted for peer review anywhere. |
*
Translation - you're pretending dissent is not being censored/punished etc. and that anyone is free to publish what they want about the vax.
Peer reviewed journals reject articles which reflect negatively on the CCP 'vaccine'. Steve Kirsch funded research on a drug that works but no one will print in censored peer review publications and the FDA etc. will not consider it. Hence, a very successful Covid drug is eliminated silently, with the kind of censorship you wholeheartedly support.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.