well.. if substack.com says it’s true.. it must be!
*rolls eyes*
stop be gullible, your making us conservatives look bad.
>>If the autopsy findings are confirmed by other pathologists ...
>>if they are combined with the findings of Dr. Hoffe ...
>>if supported by further data ...
Thats a whole lot of ‘ifs’ that must come true in order to reach a questionable conclusion, but yeah, it’s substack so must be true.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results show 93% of people who died after being vaccinated were killed by the vaccine, TexasFreeper2009 wrote: |
well.. if substack.com says it’s true.. it must be! *rolls eyes* stop be gullible, your making us conservatives look bad. |
Stop contributing to genocide. You're making humanity look bad.
He's credible. He and his team presented at ACIP (Advisory committe to the FDA) and no one could refute his team's data, so the advisory committee elected not to recommend a booster. Steve Kirsch has offered 1 million dollars to the FDA/CDC/NIH/FAUCI etc. to discuss the data with his team - no takers. They fear him because his data has statistically defensible proof.
After epic lies by the CDC/Fauci, you elect to put your faith in them. That's what I call gullible.
Wow. A personal chastising from the high priestess. You have done well. In general one doesn’t have to offer a million dollars to get someone to chat with them. It’s amazing thst refusal of such an imbecilic stunt becomes proof that it must be true!!
I seem to remember a Latin phrase describing such an erudite argument.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Keep up the good fight. You touched a rail.
Stop writing retarded sentences. You're making us conservatives look worse.