“It is doubtful that anything will happen because the work wasn’t published in a peer-reviewed journal so will be ignored by the scientific community. That’s just the way it works.”
Translation, the paper wouldn’t hold up to a serious peer-review, so it wasn’t submitted for peer review anywhere.
Translation: Peer review is a partisan-hack endeavor conducted in the same manner as banning dissenting opinions from Facebook, Twitter, etc.
Professional affirmative-action government bureaucrats/educrats are not scientists. They are politicians
Yes it would and I have a friend seriously ill after that booster shot. I am sick of Branch covidians acting like these poisson shots are normal because they are lethal.
It appears there is a new flavor of the week. Whoever the hell steve kirsh is.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results show 93% of people who died after being vaccinated were killed by the vaccine, qwerty1234 wrote: |
“It is doubtful that anything will happen because the work wasn’t published in a peer-reviewed journal so will be ignored by the scientific community. That’s just the way it works.” Translation, the paper wouldn’t hold up to a serious peer-review, so it wasn’t submitted for peer review anywhere. |
*
Translation - you're pretending dissent is not being censored/punished etc. and that anyone is free to publish what they want about the vax.
Peer reviewed journals reject articles which reflect negatively on the CCP 'vaccine'. Steve Kirsch funded research on a drug that works but no one will print in censored peer review publications and the FDA etc. will not consider it. Hence, a very successful Covid drug is eliminated silently, with the kind of censorship you wholeheartedly support.
Have you ever submitted a paper for peer review? It’s not something where you just submit it and have people scampering to review it.
When I was doing my thesis, I had to petition peers to review it. It’s not like GitHub or something where the public can scrutinize. If you don’t get people who are interested in reviewing it, it doesn’t get reviewed.
Publishing to a medical journal requires specific and intense interest in that paper. No medical journal right now is going to touch anything that counters the current big pharma byline. They get a TON of cash from big pharma and the government.
Troll alert