PAXLOVID and Molnupiravir: Avoid

Steve Kirsch's Newsletter ^ | December 23, 2021 | Steve Kirsch

[Qiviut]

How good is the FDA at EUA approval for COVID drugs? Well, so far, to be honest, pretty shitty.

The first three Covid drugs approved under EUA were Remdesivir, Baricitinib, and Tofacitinib. All were EUA approved for inpatient use (in hospital) only, demonstrate dismal effectiveness and are replete with black box warnings and side effects such as organ failure, blood clots, serious infections and malignancy.

PAXLOVID

PAXLOVID was recently approved by the FDA without any external meetings or disclosure. There was no opportunity for public input. Essentially all done behind closed doors.

Dr. Ryan Cole on the drug’s mechanism of action after infection explains, the Covid virus enters the cell and commandeers the cell forcing it to produce proteins. Protease enzymes must be present for the virus to successfully complete the cycle before taking the cell over. PAXLOVID or any drug classified as a ‘Protease Inhibitor’ will inhibit or decrease the Protease enzyme interfering with the virus. Ivermectin is the most successful and proven protease inhibitor in production. Just as with Paxlovid, ivermectin decreases the protease enzyme but...the benefits of ivermectin in Covid treatment are obvious and not present in paxlovid. Additional actions of ivermectin include anti-coagulant action and anti-inflammatory actions, both observed in Covid infections.

PAXLOVID requires combination with an HIV/AIDS drug, Ritonavir, preventing the breakdown of the PAXLOVID so it may inhibit or decrease the enzyme interrupting the viral life cycle. Dr. Cole reports Ritonavir also has its own black box warning and side effects include life-threatening liver, pancreas and heart issues.

According to Pfizer’s press release, PAXLOVID reduces hospitalization/death by 89%. So in the treatment group we had 5 of 697 hospitalized with no deaths compared to 44/682 hospitalized with 9 subsequent deaths.

How does that compare with the Fareed and Tyson protocol? Well, Fareed and Tyson had 10 times as many patients taking the drug combo and yet they had fewer hospitalizations (4) and the same number of deaths (0).

So you’re way better off with the Fareed and Tyson protocol.

Molnupiravir

First, the efficacy when it works is poor, only 50%. There were two groups in the randomized trials and in the second group, the people who got the drug ended up worse. And then there is the problem of causing cancer.

Bottom line

Avoid these drugs.

Early treatments using repurposed drugs have a track record that is safer and more effective than either of two drugs that the FDA likes.

But thanks to the NIH, you’ll never hear about early treatment protocols unless you live in Florida.

[jimwatx]

Good post.

[rlmorel]

It sickens and saddens me to read that.

[Kevmo]

Oh, yikes. I meant brownCOATS not brownSHIRTS

https://firefly.fandom.com/wiki/Browncoat#:~:text=Browncoats%20were%20soldiers%20who%20fought,coats%20they%20wore%20as%20uniforms.

BrownSHIRTS: NAZIs — real NAZIs
BrownCOATS: Firefly patriots — fictional rebels

[metmom]

This transcript is also found in Kennedy’s book “The Real Anthony Fauci”.

[Kevmo]

It comes down to $$$. “ 20 cents per life” whereas with these fancy-dancy messengerRNA gene therapy sequencing subscription “vaccines” they make at least a $thousand per life.

[SoConPubbie]

this is a ridiculously simplistic newsletter to claim that “Ivermectin is the most successful and proven protease inhibitor in production” ... there are tens of thousands of DIFFERENT proteases, and each one requires a different inhibitor ...

So ? ? ?

What's important to the common man is: does it work?

And the evidence from a multitude of places (including the Nation of Indonesia and several states in India) is that it absolutely, and phenomenally works to knock down COVID-19 and drive deaths from that disease into the ground.

[rlmorel]

I am in the process of reading it, and I have to admit, this is a hard, hard book for me to read for two main reasons.

The first reason is, I cannot stand Leftists. I despise reading their pap or hearing them speak. And RFK Jr. is a moonbat who stands against nearly every single thing I believe in. I know a stopped clock can be right twice a day, but I barely made it beyond the first chapter with his criticism of Trump and Conservatives, and in the same breath talking about issues as if he and his ilk and ZERO to do with ANY of it.

The second reason isn’t that I don’t understand it or that it is too technical. It is that, due to my profession, it is NOT too technical and as a result, I understand it all too well and has elements I find astonishingly depressing and disillusioning. We all have our things we don’t want to believe fully in. I used to (a long time ago) believe that the FBI was on our side. Only a fool would believe that, and I can’t be a fool about it.

I have resolved it to take his work, use anything that is truthful and accurate for my own knowledge and causes, and discard the rest, because I cannot see how I can make common cause with the author on nearly any subject save this.

[Qiviut]

Dr George Fareed and Dr Brian Tyson Early Treatment Protocol (December 2021)
https://www.onedaymd.com/2021/04/dr-george-fareed-and-dr-brian-tyson.html

[Steve_Seattle]

Thanks.

[metmom]

Yeah, it’s kind of ironic that as left as he is, he’s going after fauci like he is.
I understand your objections.

I consider it a valuable resource just for the information he managed to pull together. He documents and cites a huge amount. Mr. mm counted up the end notes and there are over 2,000.

[OKSooner]

Yes, this conversation is included in RFK Jr’s book.

[OKSooner]

The enemy of my enemy...

[bitt]

P

[rlmorel]

I agree it is valuable. I will get the eBook so I can mark it up.

[rlmorel]

That conversation is quite significant to me, very meaningful. Disillusioning, but very meaningful.

[ransomnote]

PING